The 28 June Landers earthquake brought the San Andreas fault significantly closer to failure near San Bernardino, a site that has not sustained a large shock since 1812. Stress also increased on the San Jacinto fault near San Bernardino and on the San Andreas fault southeast of Palm Springs. Unless creep or moderate earthquakes relieve these stress changes, the next great earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault is likely to be advanced by one to two decades. In contrast, stress on the San Andreas north of Los Angeles dropped, potentially delaying the next great earthquake there by 2 to 10 years.
The crustal thickness and crustal and upper mantle structure along the rift valleys of three segments of the northern Mid‐Atlantic Ridge with contrasting morphologies and gravity signatures are determined from a seismic refraction study. These segments lie between the Oceanographer and Hayes transforms and from north to south have progressively deeper axial valleys with less along‐axis relief and smaller mantle Bouguer gravity lows. Major variations in seismic crustal thickness and crustal velocity and density structure are observed along these segments. The thickest crust is found near the segment centers, with maximum crustal thicknesses of 8.1, 6.9, and 6.6±0.5 km, decreasing from north to south. However, the mean crustal thickness is similar for each segment (5.6±0.4, 5.7±0.4 and 5.1±0.3 km). Near the segment ends, crustal thickness is 2.5 to 5±0.5 km with no systematic variation from north to south. At segment ends, both crustal velocities and vertical velocity gradients are anomalous and may indicate fracturing and alteration of thin igneous crust and underlying mantle. Away from segment ends, the thickness of the upper crust is relatively uniform along axis (∼3 km), although its internal structure is laterally heterogeneous (velocity anomalies of ±0.6 km s−1 over distances of 5 km), possibly related to the presence of discrete volcanic centers. The along‐axis crustal thickness variations are primarily accommodated in the lower crust. The center of the northern segment (OH‐1) has an unusually thick crustal root (excess thickness of 2–4 km and along‐axis extent of 12 km). Our results are consistent with an enhanced supply of melt from the mantle to the segment centers and redistribution of magma along axis at shallow crustal levels by lateral dike injection. Along this portion of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge, our results suggest that differences in axial morphology, seismic crustal thickness, and gravity anomalies are correlated and the result of variations in melt flux from the mantle. A surprising result is that the melt flux per segment length is similar for all three segments despite their different morphologies and gravity signatures. This argues against excess melting of the mantle beneath segment OH‐1. Instead, we suggest that the thickened crust at the segment center is a result of focusing of melt, possibly due to the influence of the thermal structure of the Oceanographer fracture zone on melt migration in the mantle.
We integrate observations of lithospheric extension over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales within the northern North Sea basin and critically review the extent to which existing theories of lithospheric deformation can account for these observations. Data obtained through a prolonged periodofhydrocarbon exploration and production has yielded a dense and diverse data set over the entire Viking Graben and its anking platform areas. These data show how syn-rift accommodation within the basin varied in space and time with sub-kilometer-scale spatial resolution and a temporal resolution of 2{3 Myr. Regional interpretations of 2D seismic re ection, refraction and gravity data for this area have also been published and provide an image of total basin wide stretching for the entire crust. These image data are combined with published strain rate inversion results obtained from tectonic subsidence patterns to constrain the spatio-temporal evolution of strain accumulation throughout the lithosphere during the 40 Myr (170{130 Ma) period of Late Jurassic extension across this basin. For the rst 25{30 Myr, strain localisation dominated basin development with strain rates at the eventual rift axis increasing while strain rates over the anking areas declined. As strain rates across the whole basin were consistently very low (< 3x10 ;16 s ;1 ), thermally induced strength loss can not explain this phenomenon. The strain localisation is manifest in the near-surface by a systematic migration of fault activity. The pattern and timing of this migration are inconsistent with exural bending stresses exerting an underlying control, especially when estimates of exural rigidity for this area are Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science 31 January 2005 considered. The best explanation for what is observed in this time period is a coupling between near-surface strain localisation, driven by brittle (or plastic) failure, and the evolving thermal structure of the lithosphere. We demonstrate this process using a continuum mechanics model for normal fault growth that incorporates the strain rate-dependence of frictional strength observed in laboratory studies. During the nal 10 Myr of basin formation, strain accumulation was focused within the axis and strain rates declined rapidly. Replacement of weak crust by stronger mantle material plus crustal buoyancy forces can adequately explain this decline.
Abstract. We present new results on the crustal and upper mantle structure beneath the rift mountains along two segments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and across a nontransform offset (NTO). Our results were obtained from a combination of forward modeling and twodimensional tomographic inversion of wide-angle seismic refraction data and gravity modeling. The study area includes two segments: OH-1 between the Oceanographer fracture zone and the NTO-1 at 34ø35'N and OH-2 between NTO-1 and the NTO at 34ø10'N. The center of OH-1 is characterized by anomalously thick crust (-8 km) with a thick Moho transition zone with Vp=7.2-7.6 km/s. This transition zone, coincident with a gravity low, is probably composed of gabbro sills alternating with dunites, as observed in some ophiolites. OH-1 has larger alongaxis crustal thickness variations than OH-2, but average crustal thicknesses are similar (6.0+1.2 km at OH-l, 6.1+0.7 at OH-2). Thus we do not find significant differences in magma supply between these segments, in contrast to what has been inferred from morphological and gravity studies. At both segments the shoaling of the Moho is more rapid at the inside than at the outside corners, consistent with models in which the inside-corner crust is tectonically modified. The structural differences between inside-and outside-corner crust are more apparent at OH-2, suggesting that the extrusive layer is thinner at the inside corner of OH-2 than at the inside corner of OH-1, probably due to differences in axial morphology and along-axis magma transport. NTO-1 is characterized by a nearly constant velocity gradient within the upper 5 km and low upper mantle velocities (7.4-7.8 km/s). The anomalous structure beneath NTO-1 is interpreted as fractured mafic crust. The P wave velocities and densities required to match the gravity data suggest that serpentinites are common beneath the NTO-1 and possibly beneath the inside corners. Serpentinization could be as much as 40% at-3.8 km below seafloor and probably does not occur at subseafloor depths greater than -6.2 km at the NTO-1. Our results indicate that in a slow spreading environment where magmatism and tectonism are equally important, the seismic Moho cannot be correlated with an unique geological structure. At the center of a segment the seismic Moho may represent the lower boundary of an interlayered grabbro-dunite transition zone, while beneath the inside corner and NTO where the crust is thinner, it may correspond to an alteration front.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.