No abstract

No abstract

Exosomes are vesicles that can be secreted by many types of cell and released into the extracellular space. Studies have found that tumor derived exosomes (TEXs) can promote tumor growth and metastasis, as well as inhibit immune response through transferring their genetic information to the recipient cells. Given their functions in tumor progression, TEXs are considered as promising biomarkers for early detection of human malignancy. Dendritic cells (DCs), a type of antigen presenting cells, can induce tumor-specific T cell immune responses in carcinogenesis. Growing evidences have demonstrated that the matured DCs induced by TEXs exhibit enhanced anti-tumor effects that may be applied for cancer immunotherapy. Thus in this review, according to the previous studies, we summarized the effects of DCs loaded with TEXs in cancer immunotherapy.

ObjectiveTo determine whether infection-prevention and control (IPC) interventions can reduce the colonisation and infection of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in a general ICU ward in China.MethodsWe used a quasi-experimental before-and-after study design. The study was conducted in 4 stages: baseline period, January 2013–June 2013; IPC interventions period including de-escalation and targeted bundle interventions, July 2013–June 2014; modified IPC interventions period, July 2014–June 2015; and follow-up period, July 2015–June 2016. We used modified de-escalation interventions according to patient-risk assessments to prevent the transmission of CRKP.ResultsA total of 629 patients were enrolled in study. The incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP colonisation/infection was 10.08 (4.43–16.43) per 1000 ICU patient-days during the baseline period, and significantly decreased early during the IPC interventions, but the colonisation/infections reappeared in April 2014. During the modified IPC intervention and follow-up periods, the incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP colonisations/infections reduced to 5.62 (0.69–6.34) and 2.84 (2.80–2.89), respectively, with ongoing admission of cases with previously acquired CRKP. The incidence of ICU-acquired CRKP catheter-related bloodstream infections decreased from 2.54 during the baseline period to 0.41 during the follow-up period. The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infections showed a downward trend from 2.84 to 0.41 and from 3.4 to 0.47, respectively, with slight fluctuations.ConclusionsComprehensive IPC interventions including de-escalation and targeted bundle interventions showed a significant reduction in ICU-acquired CRKP colonisations/infections, despite ongoing admission of patients colonised/infected with CRKP.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-018-0453-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

AimsTumor electric fields therapy (TTFields) is emerging as a novel anti‐cancer physiotherapy. Despite recent breakthroughs of TTFields in glioma treatment, the average survival time for glioblastoma patients with TTFields is <2 years, even when used in conjugation with traditional anti‐cancer therapies. To optimize TTFields‐afforded efficacy against glioblastoma, we investigated the cancer cell‐killing effects of various TTFields paradigms using in vitro and in vivo models of glioblastoma.MethodsFor in vitro studies, the U251 glioma cell line or primary cell cultures prepared from 20 glioblastoma patients were treated with the tumor electric field treatment (TEFT) system. Cell number, volume, and proliferation were measured after TEFT at different frequencies (100, 150, 180, 200, or 220 kHz), durations (24, 48, or 72 h), field strengths (1.0, 1.5, or 2.2V/cm), and output modes (fixed or random sequence output). A transwell system was used to evaluate the influence of TEFT on the invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells. For in vivo studies, the therapeutic effect and safety profiles of random sequence electric field therapy in glioblastoma‐transplanted rats were assessed by calculating tumor size and survival time and evaluating peripheral immunobiological and blood parameters, respectively.ResultsIn the in vitro settings, TEFT was robustly effective in suppressing cell proliferation of both the U251 glioma cell line and primary glioblastoma cell cultures. The anti‐proliferation effects of TEFT were frequency‐ and “dose” (field strength and duration)‐dependent, and contingent on the field sequence output mode, with the random sequence mode (TEFT‐R) being more effective than the fixed sequence mode (TEFT‐F). Genetic tests were performed in 11 of 20 primary glioblastoma cultures, and 6 different genetic traits were identified them. However, TEFT exhibited comparable anti‐proliferation effects in all primary cultures regardless of their genetic traits. TEFT also inhibited the invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells in transwell experiments. In the in vivo rat model of glioblastoma brain transplantation, treatment with TEFT‐F or TEFT‐R at frequency of 200 kHz and field strength of 2.2V/cm for 14 days significantly reduced tumor volume by 42.63% (TEFT‐F vs. control, p = 0.0002) and 63.60% (TEFT‐R vs. control, p < 0.0001), and prolonged animal survival time by 30.15% (TEFT‐F vs. control, p = 0.0415) and 69.85% (TEFT‐R vs. control, p = 0.0064), respectively. The tumor‐bearing rats appeared to be well tolerable to TEFT therapies, showing only moderate increases in blood levels of creatine and red blood cells. Adverse skin reactions were common for TEFT‐treated rats; however, skin reactions were curable by local treatment.ConclusionTumor electric field treatment at optimal frequency, strength, and output mode markedly inhibits the cell viability, proliferation, and invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells in vitro independent of different genetic traits of the cells. Moreover, a random sequence electric field output confers considerable anti‐cancer effects against glioblastoma in vivo. Thus, TTFields are a promising physiotherapy for glioblastoma and warrants further investigation.