No abstract

Several predictive factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in female renal recipients have been suggested. Our study aimed to determine the most important factor for prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes in female renal recipients. We studied 41 pregnancies in 29 female renal recipients retrospectively. We reviewed pregnancy outcomes and possible predictive factors including pre-pregnancy serum creatinine (SCr), pre-pregnancy glomerular filtration rate (GFR), pre-pregnancy hypertension, pre-pregnancy proteinuria, transplantation-pregnancy interval and type of immunosuppressants. We defined an adverse pregnancy-related outcomes index (APOI) that included the following conditions: (i) preeclampsia; (ii) fetal growth restriction (FGR); (iii) prematurity before 34 wk of gestation; (iv) fetal loss (v) graft dysfunction during pregnancy or within three months from delivery. The cutoff of pre-pregnancy serum creatinine and GFR was determined by receiver operating characteristics curves for the prediction of each adverse outcome and APOI. Only pre-pregnancy serum creatinine was associated with adverse pregnancy outcome, and 1 mg/dL was determined to be a useful cutoff for the prediction of each adverse outcomes. Pre-pregnancy SCr ≥ 1 mg/dL was associated with 7.7 times increased risk of preeclampsia and 6.9 times increased risk of APOI. Pre-pregnancy serum creatinine is the most powerful predictive factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes, and <1 mg/dL may be used as a screen for successful pregnancy outcome.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether the cesarean section (CS) rate is increased in women whose labor was induced compared to those who had spontaneous labor at term pregnancy. MethodsA retrospective study was performed in women whose labor was either induced (induction group, n=497) or spontaneous (spontaneous group, n=878) at 37+0 to 41+6 weeks of gestation from January 2008 to June 2009. Maternal age, parity, body mass index (BMI), Bishop scores, gestational age, hypertension, diabetes, delivery mode, indications for CS, neonatal outcome were compared between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between the CS rate and labor induction after adjusting for potential confounding variables.Results CS (17.3% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and vacuum-assisted delivery (10.7% vs. 6.4%, P<0.001) rates were significantly higher in the induction group compared to the spontaneous group. The CS rate in the induction group was higher than the spontaneous group not only in nulliparous women (25.3% vs. 8.6%, P<0.001), but also in multiparous women (3.8% vs. 0.3%, P=0.002). However, after adjusting confounding factors, the higher CS rate was significantly associated with advanced maternal age, higher BMI, lower Bishop scores and nulliparity, with no demonstrable tie to labor induction. Neonatal outcome in the two groups were comparable. ConclusionAlthough CS rate was higher in women whose labor was induced than those who had spontaneous labor, this higher rate was associated with maternal age, BMI, Bishop scores and parity, but was not impacted by labor induction per se.