No abstract

Patient safety regarding wrong site surgery has been one of the priority issues in surgical fields including that of spine care. Since the wrong-side surgery in the DM foot patient was reported on a public mass media in 1996, the wrong-site surgery issue has attracted wide public interest as regarding patient safety. Despite the many wrong-site surgery prevention campaigns in spine care such as the operate through your initial program by the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, the sign your site program by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon, the sign, mark and X-ray program by the North American Spine Society, and the Universal Protocol program by the Joint Commission, the incidence of wrong-site surgery has not decreased. To prevent wrong-site surgery in spine surgeries, the spine surgeons must put patient safety first, complying with the hospital policies regarding patient safety. In the operating rooms, the surgeons need to do their best to level the hierarchy, enabling all to speak up if any patient safety concerns are noted. Changing the operating room culture is the essential part of the patient safety concerning spine surgery.

Background: The wide-awake approach enables surgeons to perform optimal tensioning of a transferred tendon intraoperatively. The authors hypothesized that the extensor indicis proprius–to–extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer using the wide-awake approach would yield better results than conventional surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of the prospectively collected data of 29 consecutive patients who underwent extensor indicis proprius–to–extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer. Patients were treated with the wide-awake approach (group A, n = 11) and conventional surgery under general anesthesia (group B, n = 18). The groups were compared retrospectively for thumb interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint motion, grip and pinch strength, specific extensor indicis proprius–to–extensor pollicis longus evaluation method (SEEM), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score at 6 weeks and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Group A showed significantly better interphalangeal joint flexion and total arc of motion at 6 weeks and 2, 4, and 6 months, and significantly better metacarpophalangeal joint flexion and total arc of motion at all time points. Interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint extension showed no difference at all time points. Group A showed significantly better specific extensor indicis proprius–to–extensor pollicis longus evaluation method scores at 2 and 4 months, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores at 4, 6, and 12 months. Grip and pinch strength showed no difference at all time points. The complication rate and duration until return to work were not different between groups. Conclusion: Compared with the conventional approach, the wide-awake approach showed significantly better results in the thumb’s range of motion and functional outcomes, especially in the early postoperative periods. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.