The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and the risk of mortality in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was investigated. This retrospective cohort study was performed in all hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in tertiary hospitals in Daegu, Korea. Patients were classified based on whether they received ACE-I or ARB before COVID-19 diagnosis. The analysis of the primary outcome, in-hospital mortality, was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Of 130 patients with COVID-19, 30 (23.1%) who received ACE-I or ARB exhibited an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–4.38; P = 0.025). ACE-I or ARB was also associated with severe complications, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.58; 95% CI, 1.02–6.51; P = 0.045) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15–8.15; P = 0.026). Among the patients with ACE-I or ARB therapy, 8 patients (26.7%) used high equivalent doses of ACE-I or ARB and they had higher in-hospital mortality and an increased risk of ARDS and AKI (all, P < 0.05). ACE-I or ARB therapy in patients with severe COVID-19 was associated with the occurrence of severe complications and increased in-hospital mortality. The potentially harmful effect of ACE-I or ARB therapy may be higher in patients who received high doses.

No abstract

Background/Aims: Limited information is available about the relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) immunoglobulin (Ig) G and serum pepsinogen (pepsinogen [PG], a marker of gastric mucosal atrophy) concentrations after H. pylori eradication. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer from in a tertiary-referral center, and whose serum H. pylori IgG and PG concentrations were measured at the time of performing ESD and one year post-ESD, were selected. Successful H. pylori eradication was achieved after ESD in all the patients. According to the decrease in serum H. pylori IgG concentration after bacterial eradication, the patients were categorized as group 1 (IgG concentration decreased by <50%), and group 2 (IgG concentration decreased by ≥50%). Results: Of the 106 patients, 25 (23.6%) were classified into group 1 and 81 (76.4%) into group 2. One year after H. pylori eradication, the serum PG II concentration was significantly decreased in group 2 (12.46±8.18 vs. 8.28±6.11, P=0.024). Although the serum PG I/II ratio of group 2 was higher than that of group 1 (8.32±4.52 ng/mL vs. 6.39±4.04 ng/mL), the difference was not significant (P=0.058). One year after successful eradication, elevated serum PG I/II ratio was observed in 21 patients (84%) in group 1 and in 77 patients (95.1%) in group 2 (P=0.087). The mean serum PG I/II ratio was also elevated in both groups. Serum PG II concentration was significantly decreased in group 2. Conclusions: A notable decrease in the concentration of H. pylori IgG antibody after bacterial eradication might reflect gastric mucosal atrophy. However, our study showed no statistically significant difference.

Optimal preparation is recommended for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease to minimize complications during dialysis initiation. This study evaluated the effects of planned dialysis initiation on survival in patients undergoing incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Patients newly diagnosed with end-stage kidney disease who started dialysis were enrolled in a multicenter prospective cohort study in Korea. Planned dialysis was defined as dialysis therapy initiated with permanent access and maintenance of the initial dialysis modality. A total of 2892 patients were followed up for a mean duration of 71.9 ± 36.7 months and 1280 (44.3%) patients initiated planned dialysis. The planned dialysis group showed lower mortality than the unplanned dialysis group during the 1st and 2nd years after dialysis initiation (1st year: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.72; P < 0.001; 2nd year: aHR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52–0.98, P = 0.037). However, 2 years after dialysis initiation, mortality did not differ between the groups. Planned dialysis showed a better early survival rate in hemodialysis patients, but not in peritoneal dialysis patients. Particularly, infection-related mortality was reduced only in patients undergoing hemodialysis with planned dialysis initiation. Planned dialysis has survival benefits over unplanned dialysis in the first 2 years after dialysis initiation, especially in patients undergoing hemodialysis. It improved infection-related mortality during the early dialysis period.