Although many studies have assessed mortality and morbidity of conservative treatment after hip fracture in elderly patients, the mortality of conservative treatment done because of economic burden is unclear. Among 451 patients diagnosed with displaced hip fracture during 3 yr, 28 patients (Group I) were enrolled as conservative treatment. Fifty-six patients matched in age, gender, ASA score, and diagnosis (Group II) who had undergone surgical treatment were used as the control group. The causal factors of non-operative treatment and mortality rate and functional recovery were evaluated according to the causal factors of patients with surgical procedure. Ten patients (36%) in Group I involved medical problems and 18 (64%) by economic burdens. The cumulative mortality rate over 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was 54%, 61%, 64%, and 82% in Group I and 9%, 11%, 14%, and 21% in Group II, respectively. At the latest follow-up, all five patients in Group I displayed a nonfunctional ambulatory state, whereas only seven of 44 patients in Group II were in a nonfunctional ambulatory state. Non-surgical treatment following hip fracture that is done because of the economic burden is associated with substantially high mortality and serious functional loss.
This study shows that the prevalence of herniation pits is higher in symptomatic patients with femoroacetabular impingement, and herniation pits are associated with central acetabular retroversion. Furthermore, herniation pits were also found to be a useful predictor of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, activity levels, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with those in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) over a minimum 10-year follow-up period. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2009, 90 TKAs performed in 57 patients with RA (RA group) were retrospectively reviewed and matched with a control group of 180 TKAs performed in 114 patients with OA. The functional outcomes (Knee Society Score), activity levels (Koval grade), mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications were compared between the two groups with a minimum 10-year follow-up period. The mean follow-up periods were 12.3 years in the RA group and 12.6 years in the OA group.
ResultsThe mean Knee Society knee scores in the RA and OA groups improved from 37.7 ± 5.4 to 38.2 ± 5.3 preoperatively to 72.9 ± 22.8 to 83.1 ± 11.0 points, respectively, at the inal follow-up (p < 0.05). At the inal follow-up, 38 of 48 (79.2%) in the RA group and 105 of 109 (96.3%) in the OA group (p < 0.05) were outdoor ambulatory patients. The cumulative mortality rates in the RA and OA groups were 15.8% (9/57) and 4.4% (5/114) (p < 0.05) at the inal follow-up, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis with revision of either component as an endpoint in the RA and OA groups estimated 94.4% and 98.3% chance of survival for 10 years, respectively. Conclusion TKA in patients with RA had worse functional outcomes and higher mortality over a minimum 10-year followup period, compared with TKA in patients with OA.
Background
The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, activity levels, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of patients with septic loosening with those in patients with aseptic loosening over a minimum 10-year follow-up period.
Methods
A cohort of 78 patients (36 septic loosening and 42 aseptic loosening) was selected between January 2008 and December 2009. The functional outcomes, activity levels, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications of revision TKA in patients with septic and aseptic loosening were compared.
Results
The mean Knee Society knee scores in the septic and aseptic groups improved from 36.7 and 37.4 preoperatively to 65.3 and 76.8 points at the final follow-up, respectively (p < 0.05). Outdoor ambulatory patients at the final follow-up included 20 of 29 (69.0%) patients in the septic group and 35 of 39 (89.7%) patients in the aseptic group (p < 0.05). The cumulative mortality rates in the septic and aseptic groups were 19.4% (7/36) and 7.1% (3/42) (p = 0.102) at final follow-up, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis with re-revision of either component as an endpoint in the septic and aseptic groups estimated 86.5% and 95.5% chance of survival for 10 years, respectively.
Conclusions
Revision TKA in patients with septic loosening had worse functional outcomes and higher mortality over a minimum 10-year follow-up period compared with that in patients with aseptic loosening.
Level of evidence
IV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.