Objective. Evaluate the sustainability of the Healthy Municipalities strategy in Guatemala in order to have solid evidence to support decision-making. Methods. A concurrent mixed-methods study was carried out in five phases: 1) theoretical-conceptual (based on a narrative review of the literature on sustainability, dimensions and categories were proposed for evaluation); 2) empirical (four municipalities were selected for convenience and 29 semi-structured interviews and four focus groups were conducted with key actors to explore sustainability; with this information, a score was assigned to each category and dimension); 3) analytical, by category and dimension (content analysis was performed for qualitative information, and totals and averages were calculated for quantitative information); 4) integrative (qualitative data were integrated into matrices by category and dimension, and quantitative data were supported by qualitative information); and 5) meta-inference (consideration was given to the context and its influence on the results). Results. Ninety-two (92) informants participated. In operational terms, progress was observed in the transfer and use of results, and in rotations in leadership. In the legal and political sphere, accountability and local planning were highlighted. In the economic sphere, progressive investment in health, water and sanitation was emphasized, as well as insufficient investment in social determinants of health. In the social sphere, few mechanisms were observed to promote and strengthen social participation. Conclusions. In the municipalities that participated in the study, a fair level of sustainability was observed in the Healthy Municipalities strategy.
Objetivo. Evaluar la sostenibilidad de la estrategia Municipios Saludables en Guatemala, para disponer de evidencia sólida que permita apoyar la toma de decisiones. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio mixto concurrente en cinco fases: 1) teórica-conceptual, se realizó una revisión narrativa de literatura en sostenibilidad, con base en la cual se propusieron dimensiones y categorías para su evaluación; 2) empírica, se seleccionaron por conveniencia cuatro municipios y se realizaron 29 entrevistas semiestructuradas y cuatro grupos focales a actores clave para explorar la sostenibilidad; con esta información, se asignó un puntaje a cada categoría y dimensión; 3) analítica, por categoría y dimensión, se realizó el análisis del contenido para la información cualitativa y sumatorias y promedios para la información cuantitativa; 4) integrativa, los datos cualitativos se integraron en matrices por categoría y dimensión; y los datos cuantitativos se respaldaron con información cualitativa; y 5) metainferencia, se reflexionó sobre el contexto y su influencia en los resultados. Resultados. Participaron 92 informantes. En la dimensión operativa, se destacan avances en la transferencia y el uso de resultados, así como en el relevo de liderazgo. En la dimensión legal y política, se destacaron la rendición de cuentas y los planes locales. En la dimensión económica, se destacó la inversión progresiva en salud, agua y saneamiento, con deficiencia de inversiones en determinantes sociales de la salud. En la dimensión social, se observaron pocos mecanismos para impulsar y fortalecer la participación social. Conclusiones. En los municipios que participaron del estudio se observó un nivel regular de sostenibilidad de la estrategia Municipios Saludables.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.