RESUMENEn este artículo se presentan los resultados de un proceso de revisión bibliográfica sobre rehabilitación de miembro superior basada en ambientes virtuales. El estudio parte de los siguientes interrogantes sobre el estado actual del conocimiento en el área mencionada: ¿cómo inciden los entornos virtuales frente a la rehabilitación tradicional?, ¿qué métricas de desempeño se han aplicado en la rehabilitación virtual de miembro superior? y ¿qué dispositivos hardware se utilizan en rehabilitación virtual?. Para responder las anteriores preguntas se realizó una búsqueda de artículos científicos en el motor de búsqueda Google Scholar y en las bases de datos PubMed, HINARI, ProQuest y Science Direct. De la revisión realizada se concluyó que pese a la existencia de decenas de índices de desempeño para cuantificar la habilidad motriz, no existen criterios para seleccionar el indice que mejor se adapta a los objetivos de un determinado proceso de rehabilitación.
Introduction: This publication is the product of research: “SPEM 2.0 Process Model Metrics in the Reliability of its Visual Analysis” throughout 2019, which supports the work of a master’s degree in Systems Engineering at the University of Cauca. Objective: Rebase a process model metrics set in order to increase AVISPA reliability to support the visual analysis of SPEM 2.0 software process models. Methodology: In order to improve AVISPA, a systematic literature review had been performed to find software process model metrics that are potentially apt to be represented in AVISPA. Next, a set of assessments were performed in order to enhance visual analysis tool. Finally, an ANOVA statistical assessment was realized in order to find a variance differential between AVISPA versions by comparing their F1-Score process model elements classification values. Results: AVISPA significantly improved its general classification algorithm. Most of errors were found in SPEM 2.0 variability resolution feature and collections with duplicated elements. Multiple misclassifications still persists. Conclusion: General AVISPA process model elements classification is improved. However, some process model samples remain scattered according to ANOVA results. Originality: AVISPA is a recent solution for SPEM 2.0 software process model assessment. It's recent emergence carried to a lack of articles about software process model metrics and few works about AVISPA improvements. These are the main contributions of this paper. Limitations: The project has been widely expensive in terms of execution time, traceability with all software process model elements, and mainly to find experts in software process that can meet the research requirements
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.