Introduction:Childhood malignancy, although a rare phenomenon, is still the leading cause of mortality in the pediatric population. Early diagnosis and treatment are imperative for the achievement of optimal prognosis. The study of factors facilitating the delay in diagnosis is thus of utmost importance, to both shorten the diagnostic delay and allow for early therapeutic intervention, facilitating a higher prognosis.Objective:To assess the referral pattern and the identification of potential delays in the diagnosis of childhood malignancy in a developing country.Methodology:The study was conducted in the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology department of Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India. The study included randomly selected 70 pediatric patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy, from July 2012-August 2013. The parents were interviewed using a prepared questionnaire about patient symptomatology, interaction with healthcare providers, final diagnosis, and referral details. Data were statistically analyzed using Statistica® (STATsoft).Results:70 patients were included in the study (69% boys, 31% girls). The diagnostic delay was primarily due to the delay experienced in the healthcare system, with a mean delay of 26 days (Median: 18; Range: 5-39). Those from a lower socioeconomic background and whom opted for a non-allopathic treatment approach experienced higher diagnostic delays. Diagnostic time was significantly shorter for those who visited a pediatrician versus the patients who visited a general physician or super specialties (P = 0.043).Conclusions:Diagnostic delay is often associated with an extensive disease presentation, an aggressive therapeutic approach, and has a negative impact on patient prognosis. To lower mortality rate and facilitate a favourable prognosis, diagnosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and immediate intervention.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented health, social, and economic unrest globally, particularly affecting resource-limited low-middle–income countries. The resultant curfew had made the access to and delivery of cancer care services an arduous task. We have reported the patterns of care and 1-year outcome of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment before and during COVID-19 lockdown at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent radiation therapy (RT) for nonmetastatic HNSCC between March 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, were included in the COVID-RT group, and those who were treated between October 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, were included in the preCOVID-RT group. RESULTS A total of 25 patients were in the COVID-RT group, and 51 patients were in the preCOVID-RT group. An increase in the incidence of locally advanced cancers across all subsites was observed in the COVID-RT group. There was a steep increase in the median overall RT treatment duration (52 v 44) and median break days during RT (10 v 2) in the COVID-RT group. The median follow-up period of all patients was 18 months. The progression-free survival at 1 year in the COVID-RT group and preCOVID-RT group was 84% and 90%, respectively ( P = .08), and overall survival at 1 year was 86% and 96%, respectively ( P = .06). CONCLUSION Our study elucidates the adverse impact of the COVID-19 curfew on cancer care and has demonstrated safe delivery of RT for HNSCC without major acute adverse effects. Despite a significant increase in treatment breaks, early outcome data also suggest that 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival are comparable with that of the pre–COVID-19 times; however, longer follow-up is warranted.

Aim: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic is bound to put tremendous pressure on the existing healthcare system. This aim of this technical note is to help in triaging patients with brain tumours who are sent for radiotherapy during this pandemic and to provide safe and evidence-based care. Materials and Methods: Published data for this review were identified by systematically searching PubMed database from November 2007 onwards with the following Medical Subject Heading (Mesh) terms ‘Brain tumours’, ‘COVID-19’, ‘coronavirus’, ‘SARS-nCoV-2’, ‘Radiotherapy’, ‘Guidelines’ ‘hypofractionation’ using Boolean search algorithm. Articles in English language were reviewed. Results: We tried to apply the as low as reasonable achievable (ALARA) principle in triaging and management of patients for radiotherapy. We identified protocols which have hypofractionated regimens (reducing patient visits to hospital, time spent in treatment console) with similar outcomes when compared to conventional fractionated regimens and not overburdening the healthcare facility. We also identified the tumours for which we could safely avoid or delay the initiation of radiotherapy. Conclusion: Treatment decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic rely on the safety first/do no harm principle and evidence-based prioritisation of cases for triage. This article is a tool to aid in triaging and prioritising brain tumour patient management. This is for consideration during the pandemic only and certainly not as a strategy for permanent practice change.

Background: Primary intracranial germ cell tumors (ICGCT) are often diagnosed with tumor markers and imaging, which may avoid the need for a biopsy. An intracranial germ cell tumor with mild elevation of markers is seldom stratified as a distinct entity. Methods: Fifty-nine patients were stratified into three groups: pure germinoma (PG), secreting germinoma (SG) and non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs). Results: At 5 years, progression-free survival and overall survival of the three groups (PG vs SG vs NGGCT) were 91% versus 81% versus 59%, and 100% versus 82% versus 68%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome among histologically and clinically diagnosed germinomas. Conclusion: A criterion for clinical diagnosis when a biopsy is not feasible is elucidated, and comparable outcomes were demonstrated with histologically diagnosed germinomas.

Aim of the study: To evaluate the prognostic role of markers of fluor-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG-PET-CT), such as maximum standard uptake value (SUV max ) and metabolic tumour volume (MTV) measured at primary and nodal disease, and their clinical significance in terms of predicting treatment outcomes and survival. Material and methods: Between January 2017 and January 2020, 20 case records of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients who underwent 18 F-FDG-PET-CT as part of staging workup before radiotherapy and as a part of response evaluation after radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Results: At a median follow-up of 34.7 months, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 70% and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 79%. Patients with a lower nodal SUV max (SUV max-N ) had a better 2-year PFS (91% vs. 46%; p = 0.035) and 2-year OS (95% vs. 58%; p = 0.015). A high SUV max-N of > 10.58 was a negative predictor of OS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1; p = 0.003) as well as PFS (95% CI: 0.64-1; p = 0.017). Also, a high MTV > 25.8 cm 3 was a negative predictor of PFS (95% CI: 0.58-0.98; p = 0.048). MTV was an independent predictor of PFS and OS on univariate analysis, whereas it was not significant in the Cox regression multivariate analysis. Conclusions: High values of MTV and SUV max-N can be considered as independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS in nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation, highlighting the need for more intensified treatment.

No abstract

No abstract

Aim: To compare dose to target and organs at risk (OARs) in conventional plan (2D) versus computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) plan in vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) and to compare the effect of bladder distension on target and OARs dosimetry. Materials and methods: Post-hysterectomy patients with an indication for VBT were included in the study. All patients underwent planning CT scans with a full bladder and an empty bladder protocol. For each CT, two plans were generated—one library-based 2D plan and another CT-based 3D plan. Dosimetric parameters were recorded for clinical target volume (CTV) and OARs. Results: A total of 92 observations were made from data collected from 46 patients. Difference between CTV dose in terms of 2D and 3D plans were not statistically significant for CTV (p = 0·11). Significant reduction in D0·1cc, D1cc and D2cc dose parameters were observed in bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel doses with the 3D plan (p < 0·001). Bladder distension showed a 20% reduction in dose for bowel (p < 0·001). Bladder distension also showed a 6·12% (p = 0·047) increase in D2cc, but there was a significant reduction in the mean dose to the bladder. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the dosimetric benefits with 3D CT-based planning for VBT over 2D-based conventional planning and benefit of bladder distension in the reduction of bowel dose without compromising dose to the target volume.