the now-defunct Street Crimes Unit whose effects were experienced with particular harshness, then as now, among black and Latino men and youth in the city's more economically marginalized communities. 5 The responses to these campaigns at the time included an upsurge of complaints brought before the Civilian Complaint Review Board, 6 five governmental investigations, 7 and a lawsuit, Daniels v. City of New York, 8 litigated by the Center for Constitutional Rights, that among other things, sought to enjoin stop-and-frisks without a showing of reasonable suspicion and to enjoin Street Crimes Unit officers from basing stops on race or national origin. 9 Among the governmental inquires, a report issued in 1999 by the New York Attorney General's Office compiled data demonstrating that blacks in New York City were stopped for weapons searches six times as often and Latino's four times as often as whites. 10 The next year, a report of the US Commission of Civil Rights pointed to NYPD data that, to use its terms, strongly suggested that the NYPD used racial profiling in stops, frisks, and searches. 11 Along with those official inquiries, and there were others going on in the city-an investigation in the Department of Justice as well 12-community-based groups including Parents Against Police Brutality, 13 the National Congress of Puerto Rican Rights, 14 and the 5 Id.
La criminología moderna al formular que los sujetos delincuentes aprenden a serlo, y prever la existencia de factores de riesgo, los cuales favorecen la reincidencia, se ve impulsada a considerar todos aquellos planteamientos que tratan al delito integralmente; a tales efectos, el objeto de este trabajo es analizar la autoeficacia delictual como potente constructo para la predicción y prevención del comportamiento delictivo del sujeto. Su desarrollo prevé la precisión histórico-terminológica del constructo, la capacidad explicativa-predictiva y dimensiones del mismo, la interrelación entre autoeficacia delictual, prevención penal y seguridad ciudadana integral, y finalmente la validez del constructo dentro de la reinserción social, reseñando que la autoeficacia delictual explica y predice al delito, logrando ser eficaz en programas resocializadores.
La prosecución del proceso penal por vía del acuerdo reparatorio comporta acciones influenciadas por el sentido de autoeficacia poco perceptibles a la justicia, de allí que este trabajo se plantee analizar las implicaciones de la autoeficacia del imputado dentro de la justicia penal reparadora. Su desarrollo, se inicia develando el carácter normativo impreso en las nociones de actor activo del delito y de justicia reparadora. Seguidamente, examina el carácter de los acuerdos reparatorios y su tipificación penal explicitando su naturaleza auto- compositiva, y finalmente precisa las incidencias entre la autoeficacia y el sistema de justicia penal reparador, señalando que en la reparación la autoeficacia del imputado es clave para respetar obligaciones, concluyendo que la misma evita la inobservancia de acuerdos.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.