Summary Background More than half of all people diagnosed with cancer receive chemotherapy, and approximately 65% of these develop chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA), a side-effect that can have considerable negative psychological repercussions. Currently, there are very few animal models available to study the mechanism and prevention of CIA. Aim To develop a clinically relevant adult rat model for CIA. Methods We first tested whether neonatal pigmented Long–Evans (LE) rats developed alopecia in response to the chemotherapeutic agents etoposide and cyclophosphamide. We then determined whether the rats developed CIA as adults. In the latter experiment, rat dorsal hair was clipped during the early telogen stage to synchronize the hair cycle. and starting 15 days later, the rats were treated with etoposide for 3 days. Results Neonatal LE pups developed CIA in response to etoposide and cyclophosphamide, similar to other murine models for CIA. Clipping of the hair shaft during early telogen resulted in synchronized anagen induction and subsequent alopecia after etoposide treatment in the clipped areas only. Hair follicles in the clipped areas had the typical chemotherapy-induced follicular dystrophy (dystrophic catagen). When the hair in the pigmented alopecic areas regrew, it had normal pigmentation. Conclusions A novel, pigmented adult rat model has been established for CIA. By hair shaft clipping during early telogen, synchronized anagen entry was induced that resulted in alopecia in response to chemotherapy. This is the first clinically relevant adult rat model for CIA and will be a useful tool to test agents for the prevention and treatment of CIA.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between AA and physiological/psychological stress. In this study, we investigated the effects of heat treatment, a physiological stress, on AA development in C3H/HeJ mice. Whereas this strain of mice are predisposed to AA at low incidence by 18 months of age, we observed a significant increase in the incidence of hair loss in heat-treated 8-month-old C3H/HeJ mice compared with sham-treated mice. Histological analysis detected mononuclear cell infiltration in anagen hair follicles, a characteristic of AA, in heat-treated mouse skin. As expected, increased expression of induced HSPA1A/B (formerly called HSP70i) was detected in skin samples from heat-treated mice. Importantly, increased HSPA1A/B expression was also detected in skin samples from C3H/HeJ mice that developed AA spontaneously. Our results suggest that induction of HSPA1A/B may precipitate the development of AA in C3H/HeJ mice. For future studies, the C3H/HeJ mice with heat treatment may prove a useful model to investigate stress response in AA.

Based on encouraging reports of improved response rates with the use of dacarbazine (DTIC) in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2a (rIFN-α-2a) in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma, we conducted a phase II study to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this treatment regimen. 31 patients were treated with an induction dose of rIFN-α-2a at 15 MIU/ m² intravenously (IV) daily for 5 days per week for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a continuous maintenance dose of 10 MIU/m² subcutaneously (SQ) given 3 days per week; starting on day 22, in conjunction with rIFN-α-2a SQ, DTIC was started at a dose of 200 mg/m² IV for 5 continuous days completing a 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued until progression was evidenced. Of the 29 evaluable patients, 7 (24.1%) achieved an objective response (complete plus partial remission) with the highest responses occurring in those patients assessed with pulmonary metastases. The median duration to treatment failure was 2.6 months, while the median survival was 6.9 months. Our data reveal that using rIFN-α-2a plus DTIC in combination does not yield better results than those achieved when using DTIC alone. However, 3 of the 7 responders experienced long-term survival ranging up to 42 months. Whether this benefit is achieved by the addition of rIFN-α-2a can only be answered by large randomized clinical trials. Conflicting results with some of the current literature are discussed.