Long-lasting synaptic plasticity and memory requires mRNA translation, yet little is known as to how this process is regulated. To explore the role that the translation repressor 4E-BP2 plays in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) and learning and memory, we examined 4E-BP2 knock-out mice. Interestingly, genetic elimination of 4E-BP2 converted early-phase LTP to late-phase LTP (L-LTP) in the Schaffer collateral pathway, likely as a result of increased eIF4F complex formation and translation initiation. A critical limit for activityinduced translation was revealed in the 4E-BP2 knock-out mice because L-LTP elicited by traditional stimulation paradigms was obstructed. Moreover, the 4E-BP2 knock-out mice also exhibited impaired spatial learning and memory and conditioned fear-associative memory deficits. These results suggest a crucial role for proper regulation of the eIF4F complex by 4E-BP2 during LTP and learning and memory in the mouse hippocampus.
Long-term depression (LTD) is an activity-dependent decrease in synaptic efficacy that can be induced in hippocampal area CA1 by pharmacological application of the selective group I metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist 3,5-diyhroxyphenylglycine (DHPG). Recent work has demonstrated that DHPG-induced LTD recruits at least two signal transduction pathways known to couple to translation, the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. However, it remains unclear which translation factors are engaged by these two signaling pathways during mGluR-LTD. In this study, we investigated whether the group I mGluRs couple to the cap-dependent translation proteins: Mnk1, eIF4E, and 4E-BP. We found that both the MEK-ERK and PI3K-mTOR signaling pathways are critical for the DHPG-induced regulation of these translation factors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that increasing eIF4F complex availability via the genetic elimination of 4E-BP2 can enhance the degree of LTD achieved by DHPG application in an ERK-dependent manner. Our results provide direct evidence that cap-dependent translation is engaged during mGluR-LTD and demonstrate that the MEK-ERK and PI3K-mTOR signaling pathways converge to regulate eIF4E activity after induction of DHPG-LTD.
Highly selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5) have emerged as a potential approach to treat positive symptoms associated with schizophrenia. mGluR5 plays an important role in both long term potentiation (LTP) and long term depression (LTD), suggesting that mGluR5 PAMs may also have utility in improving impaired cognitive function. However, if mGluR5 PAMs shift the balance of LTP and LTD or induce a state in which afferent activity induces lasting changes in synaptic function that are not appropriate for a given pattern of activity, this could disrupt rather than enhance cognitive function. We determined the effect of selective mGluR5 PAMs on induction of LTP and LTD at the Schaffer collateral – CA1 synapse in the hippocampus. mGluR5-selective PAMs significantly enhanced threshold theta burst stimulation (TBS)-induced LTP. In addition, mGluR5 PAMs enhanced both DHPG-induced LTD and LTD induced by delivery of paired-pulse low frequency stimulation. Selective potentiation of mGluR5 had no effect on LTP induced by suprathreshold TBS or saturated LTP. The finding that potentiation of mGluR5-mediated responses to stimulation of glutamatergic afferents enhances both LTP and LTD supports the hypothesis that activation of mGluR5 by endogenous glutamate contributes to both forms of plasticity. Furthermore, two systemically active mGluR5 PAMs enhanced performance in the Morris water maze, a measure of hippocampus-dependent spatial learning. Discovery of small molecules that enhance both LTP and LTD in an activity-appropriate manner demonstrates a unique action on synaptic plasticity that may provide a novel approach for treatment of impaired cognitive function.
Apolipoprotein receptors belong to an evolutionarily conserved surface receptor family that has intimate roles in the modulation of synaptic plasticity and is necessary for proper hippocampal-dependent memory formation. The known lipoprotein receptor ligand Reelin is important for normal synaptic plasticity, dendritic morphology, and cognitive function; however, the in vivo effect of enhanced Reelin signaling on cognitive function and synaptic plasticity in wild-type mice is unknown. The present studies test the hypothesis that in vivo enhancement of Reelin signaling can alter synaptic plasticity and ultimately influence processes of learning and memory. Purified recombinant Reelin was injected bilaterally into the ventricles of wild-type mice. We demonstrate that a single in vivo injection of Reelin increased activation of adaptor protein Disabled-1 and cAMP-response element binding protein after 15 min. These changes correlated with increased dendritic spine density, increased hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP), and enhanced performance in associative and spatial learning and memory. The present study suggests that an acute elevation of in vivo Reelin can have longterm effects on synaptic function and cognitive ability in wild-type mice.
Molecular chaperones regulate the aggregation of a number of proteins that pathologically misfold and accumulate in neurodegenerative diseases. Identifying ways to manipulate these proteins in disease models is an area of intense investigation; however, the translation of these results to the mammalian brain has progressed more slowly. In this study, we investigated the ability of one of these chaperones, heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27), to modulate tau dynamics. Recombinant wild-type Hsp27 and a genetically altered version of Hsp27 that is perpetually pseudo-phosphorylated (3ϫS/D) were generated. Both Hsp27 variants interacted with tau, and atomic force microscopy and dynamic light scattering showed that both variants also prevented tau filament formation. However, extrinsic genetic delivery of these two Hsp27 variants to tau transgenic mice using adeno-associated viral particles showed that wild-type Hsp27 reduced neuronal tau levels, whereas 3ϫS/D Hsp27 was associated with increased tau levels. Moreover, rapid decay in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) intrinsic to this tau transgenic model was rescued by wild-type Hsp27 overexpression but not by 3ϫS/D Hsp27. Because the 3ϫS/D Hsp27 mutant cannot cycle between phosphorylated and dephosphorylated states, we can conclude that Hsp27 must be functionally dynamic to facilitate tau clearance from the brain and rescue LTP; however, when this property is compromised, Hsp27 may actually facilitate accumulation of soluble tau intermediates.
-Adrenergic receptors critically modulate long-lasting synaptic plasticity and long-term memory in the mammalian hippocampus. Persistent long-term potentiation of synaptic strength requires protein synthesis and has been correlated with some forms of hippocampal long-term memory. However, the intracellular processes that initiate protein synthesis downstream of the -adrenergic receptor are unidentified. Here we report that activation of -adrenergic receptors recruits ERK and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling to facilitate longterm potentiation maintenance at the level of translation initiation. Treatment of mouse hippocampal slices with a -adrenergic receptor agonist results in activation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E and the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E kinase Mnk1, along with inhibition of the translation repressor 4E-BP. This coordinated activation of translation machinery requires concomitant ERK and mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Taken together, our data identify distinct signaling pathways that converge to regulate -adrenergic receptor-dependent protein synthesis during long-term synaptic potentiation in the hippocampus. We suggest that -adrenergic receptors play a crucial role in gating the induction of long-lasting synaptic plasticity at the level of translation initiation, a mechanism that may underlie the ability of these receptors to influence the formation of long-lasting memories.Neuromodulatory transmitters control the processing and storage of information to critically regulate cognitive function in the mammalian brain. Synaptic plasticity is widely believed to mediate memory storage at the cellular level (1-5), and neuromodulators can modify synaptic strength. However, the intracellular signaling mechanisms by which neuromodulators regulate long-lasting synaptic plasticity remain unclear. One neuromodulator that is strongly implicated in memory and synaptic plasticity is noradrenaline. In the mammalian hippocampus, noradrenaline acts on -adrenergic receptors (-ARs) 5 to enhance the retention and recall of information, suggesting a selective role for these receptors in long-term memory (6 -9).De novo protein synthesis is required for long-term memory and long-lasting synaptic plasticity (10, 11). Some evidence suggests that -ARs are involved in plasticity-related protein synthesis. Activation of hippocampal noradrenergic afferents induces protein synthesis-dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength in awake animals (12). Similarly, activation of -ARs during weak synaptic activity elicits protein synthesis-dependent enhancement of LTP in hippocampal slices (13,14). The mechanisms that stimulate protein synthesis following activation of -ARs and the intracellular signaling pathways that regulate this initiation of translation are unknown. Thus, an important question is as follows: How does activation of -ARs elicit translation to facilitate induction of protein synthesis-dependent LTP?Eukaryotic protein synthesis is controlled primarily at the lev...
Considerable evidence indicates that the general blockade of protein synthesis prevents both the initial consolidation and the postretrieval reconsolidation of long-term memories. These findings come largely from studies of drugs that block ribosomal function, so as to globally interfere with both cap-dependent and -independent forms of translation. Here we show that intraamygdala microinfusions of 4EGI-1, a small molecule inhibitor of cap-dependent translation that selectively disrupts the interaction between eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF) 4E and 4G, attenuates fear memory consolidation but not reconsolidation. Using a combination of behavioral and biochemical techniques, we provide both in vitro and in vivo evidence that the eIF4E-eIF4G complex is more stringently required for plasticity induced by initial learning than for that triggered by reactivation of an existing memory. T he synthesis of new proteins within relevant neuronal circuits is widely agreed to be a basic requirement for long-term memory (LTM) storage. Translation is important for stabilizing active memories because it triggers the production of new proteins that are required for persistent molecular and synaptic changes during both consolidation (after learning) and reconsolidation (after memory reactivation). However, the role of translation in memory formation has been explored only in the context of overall cellular protein translation. There are at least two forms of protein synthesis that could in principle be exploited for either memory consolidation or reconsolidation. The primary mode of translation initiation requires formation of a multiprotein complex of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) bound to the 5′ methylated-GTP cap of target mRNAs (1, 2). Specifically, the interaction between eIF4E and eIF4G facilitates eIF4A RNA helicase activity, recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit, scanning, and peptide elongation (3, 4). Molecules that block the formation of eIF4F (eIF4E + eIF4G + eIF4A), such as the endogenous regulator 4E-binding protein, which binds to and sequesters eIF4E, therefore effectively inhibits cap-dependent translation. Likewise, the small molecule, 4EGI-1, which selectively disrupts eIF4E-eIF4G interactions (eIF4F formation) in vitro (5), also inhibits cap-dependent translation. The second route that mRNAs can be translated occurs via internal ribosomal entry sites (IRES), which are unaffected by disruptions to the 5′ cap translation machinery, such as blockade of eIF4E-eIF4G interactions (5). A role for eIF4E-eIF4G interactions during hippocampal synaptic plasticity has been shown (6-8), but they have not yet been demonstrated for memory formation. The ability to dissociate mechanisms of translation control is relevant to the study of associative learning because little is known about the relative roles of cap-dependent and IRES-mediated translation in mammalian brain function. For example, there is evidence that an IRES mediates translation of fragile X mental retardation protein, a protein that is absent in ...
cAMP is a critical second messenger implicated in synaptic plasticity and memory in the mammalian brain. Substantial evidence links increases in intracellular cAMP to activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and subsequent phosphorylation of downstream effectors (transcription factors, receptors, protein kinases) necessary for long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength. However, cAMP may also initiate signaling via a guanine nucleotide exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac). The role of Epac in hippocampal synaptic plasticity is unknown. We found that in area CA1 of mouse hippocampal slices, activation of Epac enhances maintenance of LTP without affecting basal synaptic transmission. The persistence of this form of LTP requires extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) and new protein synthesis, but not transcription. Because ERK is involved in translational control of long-lasting plasticity and memory, our data suggest that Epac is a crucial link between cAMP and ERK during some forms of protein synthesis-dependent LTP. Activation of Epac represents a novel signaling pathway for rapid regulation of the stability of enduring forms of LTP and, perhaps, of hippocampusdependent long-term memories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.