BACKGROUND: Currently there is no reliable test to predict pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. However, there is increasing interest in using clinical complete response as a surrogate marker, allowing a subset of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to be allocated into a “watch and wait” pathway. Little is known about the oncological safety of the “watch and wait” approach or the rate of salvage surgery in cases of tumor regrowth. This information is critical for the implementation of this approach. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the rate of salvage surgery and associated oncological outcomes for patients who develop a tumor regrowth with the “watch and wait” approach. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies were identified through PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar search. STUDY SELECTION: A systematic review was undertaken of studies assessing patients selected for the “watch and wait” approach according to PRISMA guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The associated tumor regrowth, salvage surgery, and disease-free and overall survival rates were assessed. RESULTS: Five retrospective and 4 prospective observational studies were included into the analysis, with a total of 370 patients in the “watch and wait” group, of which 256 (69.2%) had persistent clinical complete response. Of those who had tumor regrowth, salvage surgery was possible in 83.8%. There was no difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between patients who received immediate surgery and the “watch and wait” group. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and small sample size. Furthermore, there is significant heterogeneity between study protocols, including the short median follow-up, given that tumor regrowth and distant metastasis may manifest at a later time point. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with tumor regrowth can be salvaged with definite surgery after “watch and wait.” However, there is insufficient evidence to draw firm conclusions on the oncological safety of this approach; therefore, it is currently not the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: There is increasing literature emerging on the significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colorectal cancer. However, there have been inconsistent findings, secondary to small patient numbers and varied methods for identifying these lymphocytes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic and predictive power of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in colon, rectal (in neoadjuvant setting), and metastatic colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase was undertaken from January 2006 to December 2016. STUDY SELECTION: The inclusion criteria included a description of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subset(s) assessed with reporting of associated short- and long-term outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures, were disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were included, 15 for primary colorectal cancer (4719 patients), 7 for locally advanced rectal cancer (727 patients), and 3 studies for metastatic colorectal cancer (418 patients). High CD3+, CD8+, FoxP3+, and CD45RO+ densities were associated with improved overall survival for primary colorectal cancer, with pooled estimated HRs of 0.88, 0.81, 0.70, and 0.63 (all p < 0.001) respectively. Furthermore, in locally advanced rectal cancer, the levels of CD8+ cells were a significant predictor of good tumor regression grade after chemoradiotherapy. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of included studies and the significant interstudy heterogeneity were limitations. CONCLUSIONS: There is increasing evidence that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes play an important role in predicting prognosis in colorectal cancer and tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clinical researchers are now in a unique position to build on this work to identify robust predictive markers to stratify patients not only to currently available therapies but also to immunotherapy, which has demonstrated success in improving patient outcomes.
Purpose The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumors is superior to conventional pathologic staging in predicting patient outcome. However, their presence does not define TIL functionality. Here we developed an assay that tests TIL cytotoxicity in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer before definitive treatment, identifying those who will obtain a pathologic complete response (pCR). We also used the assay to demonstrate the rescue of TIL function after checkpoint inhibition blockade (CIB). Patients and Methods Thirty-four consecutive patients were identified initially, with successful completion of the assay before surgery in those 17 patients who underwent full treatment. An in vitro cytotoxic assay of rectal cancer tumoroids cocultured with patient-matched TILs was established and validated. Newly diagnosed patients were recruited with pretreatment biopsy specimens processed within 1 month. Evaluation of TIL-mediated tumoroid lysis was performed by measuring the mean fluorescence intensity of cell death marker, propidium iodide. CIB (anti–programmed cell death protein 1 [anti–PD-1] antibody) response was also assessed in a subset of patient specimens. Results Six of the 17 patients achieved an objective pCR on final evaluation of the resected specimen after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Cytotoxic killing identified the pCR group with a higher mean fluorescence intensity (27,982 [95% CI, 25,340 to 30,625]) compared with the non-pCR cohort (12,428 [95% CI, 9,434 to 15,423]; p < .001). Assessment of the effectiveness of CIB revealed partial restoration of cytotoxicity in TILs with increased PD-1 expression with anti–PD-1 antibody exposure. Conclusion Evaluating TIL function can be undertaken within weeks of the diagnostic biopsy, affording the potential to alter patient management decisions and refine selection for a watch-and-wait protocol. This cytotoxic assay also has the potential to serve as a platform to assist in the additional development of CIB.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.