An extensive corticofugal system extends from the auditory cortex toward subcortical nuclei along the auditory pathway. Corticofugal influences reach even into the inner ear via the efferents of the olivocochlear bundle, the medial branch of which modulates preneural sound amplification gain. This corticofugal system is thought to contribute to neuroplasticity underlying auditory perceptual learning. In the present study, we investigated the involvement of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) in perceptual learning as a result of auditory training. MOCB activity was monitored in normal-hearing adult listeners during a 5 d training regimen on a consonant-vowel phoneme-in-noise discrimination task. The results show significant group learning, with great inter-individual variability in initial performance and improvement. As observed in previous auditory training studies, poor initial performers tended to show greater learning. Strikingly, MOCB activity measured on the first training day strongly predicted the subsequent amount of improvement, such that weaker initial MOCB activity was associated with greater improvement. Moreover, in listeners that improved significantly, an increase in MOCB activity was observed after training. Thus, as discrimination thresholds of listeners converged over the course of training, differences in MOCB activity between listeners decreased. Additional analysis showed that MOCB activity did not explain variation in performance between listeners on any training day but rather reflected an individual listener's performance relative to their personal optimal range. The findings suggest an MOCB-mediated listening strategy that facilitates speech-in-noise perception. The operation of this strategy is flexible and susceptible to training, presumably because of task-related adaptation of descending control from the cortex.

No abstract

The medial olivocochlear (MOC) bundle reduces the gain of the cochlear amplifier through reflexive activation by sound. Physiological results indicate that MOC-induced reduction in cochlear gain can enhance the response to signals when presented in masking noise. Some previous studies suggest that this "antimasking" effect of the MOC system plays a role in speech-in-noise perception. The present study set out to reinvestigate this hypothesis by correlating measures of MOC activity and speech-in-noise processing across a group of normal-hearing participants. MOC activity was measured using contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), and speech-in-noise processing was measured by measuring the effect of noise masking on performance in a consonant-vowel (CV) discrimination task and on auditory brain stem responses evoked by a CV syllable. Whereas there was a significant correlation between OAE suppression and both measures of speech-in-noise processing, the direction of this correlation was opposite to that predicted by the antimasking hypothesis, in that individuals with stronger OAE suppression tended to show greater noise-masking effects on CV processing. The current results indicate that reflexive MOC activation is not always beneficial to speech-in-noise processing. We propose an alternative to the antimasking hypothesis, whereby the MOC system benefits speech-in-noise processing through dynamic (e.g., attention- and experience-dependent), rather than reflexive, control of cochlear gain.

A common method for measuring changes in temporal processing sensitivity in both humans and animals makes use of GaP-induced Inhibition of the Acoustic Startle (GPIAS). It is also the basis of a common method for detecting tinnitus in rodents. However, the link to tinnitus has not been properly established because GPIAS has not yet been used to objectively demonstrate tinnitus in humans. In guinea pigs, the Preyer (ear flick) myogenic reflex is an established method for measuring the acoustic startle for the GPIAS test, while in humans, it is the eye-blink reflex. Yet, humans have a vestigial remnant of the Preyer reflex, which can be detected by measuring skin surface potentials associated with the Post-Auricular Muscle Response (PAMR). A similar electrical potential can be measured in guinea pigs and we aimed to show that the PAMR could be used to demonstrate GPIAS in both species. In guinea pigs, we compare the GPIAS measured using the pinna movement of the Preyer reflex and the electrical potential of the PAMR to demonstrate that the two are at least equivalent. In humans, we establish for the first time that the PAMR provides a reliable way of measuring GPIAS that is a pure acoustic alternative to the multimodal eye-blink reflex. Further exploratory tests showed that while eye gaze position influenced the size of the PAMR response, it did not change the degree of GPIAS. Our findings confirm that the PAMR is a sensitive method for measuring GPIAS and suggest that it may allow direct comparison of temporal processing between humans and animals and may provide a basis for an objective test of tinnitus.