No abstract

Despite decades of methods development for classifying relatives in genetic studies, pairwise relatedness methods’ recalls are above 90% only for first through third degree relatives. The top-performing approaches, which leverage identity-by-descent (IBD) segments, often use only kinship coefficients, while others, including ERSA, use the number of segments relatives share. To quantify the potential for using segment numbers in relatedness inference, we leveraged information theory measures to analyze exact (i.e., produced by a simulator) IBD segments from simulated relatives. Over a range of settings, we found that the mutual information between the relatives’ degree of relatedness and a tuple of their kinship coefficient and segment number is on average 4.6% larger than between the degree and the kinship coefficient alone. We further evaluated IBD segment number utility by building a Bayes classifier to predict first through sixth degree relationships using different feature sets. When trained and tested with exact segments, the inclusion of segment numbers improves the recall by between 0.28% and 3% for second through sixth degree relatives. However, the recalls improve by less than 1.8% per degree when using inferred segments, suggesting limitations due to IBD detection accuracy. Lastly, we compared our Bayes classifier that includes segment numbers with both ERSA and IBIS and found comparable recalls, with the Bayes classifier and ERSA slightly outperforming each other across different degrees. Overall, this study shows that IBD segment numbers can improve relatedness inference, but errors from current SNP array-based detection methods yield dampened signals in practice.

Despite decades of methods development for classifying relatives in genetic studies, pairwise relatedness methods' recalls are above 90% only for first through third degree relatives. The top-performing approaches, which leverage identity-by-descent (IBD) segments, often use only kinship coefficients, while others, including ERSA, use the number of segments relatives share. To quantify the potential for using segment numbers in relatedness inference, we leveraged information theory measures to analyze exact (i.e., produced by a simulator) IBD segments from simulated relatives. Over a range of settings, we found that the mutual information between the relatives' degree of relatedness and a tuple of their kinship coefficient and segment number is on average 4.6% larger than between the degree and the kinship coefficient alone. We further evaluated IBD segment number utility by building a Bayes classifier to predict first through sixth degree relationships using different feature sets. When trained and tested with exact segments, the inclusion of segment numbers improves the recall by between 0.0028 and 0.030 for second through sixth degree relatives. However, the recalls improve by less than 0.018 per degree when using inferred segments, suggesting limitations due to IBD detection accuracy. Lastly, we compared our Bayes classifier that includes segment numbers with ERSA and IBIS and found comparable results, with the Bayes classifier and ERSA slightly outperforming each other across different degrees. Overall, this study shows that IBD segment numbers can improve relatedness inference but that errors from current SNP array-based detection methods yield dampened signals in practice.

No abstract