PurposeTo identify the risk factors for failure of nonsurgical reduction of intussusception.MethodsData from intussusception patients who were treated with nonsurgical reduction in Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital between January 2006 and December 2012 were collected. Patients aged 0–15 years and without contraindications (peritonitis, abdominal X-ray signs of perforation, and/or hemodynamic instability) were included for nonsurgical reduction. The success and failure groups were divided according to the results of the reduction. Prognostic indicators for failed reduction were identified by using generalized linear model for exponential risk regression. The risk ratio (RR) was used to report each factor.ResultsOne hundred and ninety cases of intussusception were enrolled. Twenty cases were excluded due to contraindications. A total of 170 cases of intussusception were included for the final analysis. The significant risk factors for reduction failure clustered by an age of 3 years were weight <12 kg (RR =1.48, P=0.004), symptom duration >3 days (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable abdominal mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side) (RR =1.48, P<0.001), poor prognostic signs on ultrasound scans (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic) (RR =1.34, P=0.023). The prediction ability of this model was 82.21% as assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.ConclusionThe identified prognostic factors for the nonsurgical reduction failure may help to predict the reduction outcome and provide information to the parents.
PurposeIntussusception is a common surgical emergency in infants and children. The incidence of intussusception is from one to four per 2,000 infants and children. If there is no peritonitis, perforation sign on abdominal radiographic studies, and nonresponsive shock, nonoperative reduction by pneumatic or hydrostatic enema can be performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the success rates of both the methods.MethodsTwo institutional retrospective cohort studies were performed. All intussusception patients (ICD-10 code K56.1) who had visited Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital from January 2006 to December 2012 were included in the study. The data were obtained by chart reviews and electronic databases, which included demographic data, symptoms, signs, and investigations. The patients were grouped according to the method of reduction followed into pneumatic reduction and hydrostatic reduction groups with the outcome being the success of the reduction technique.ResultsOne hundred and seventy episodes of intussusception occurring in the patients of Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital were included in this study. The success rate of pneumatic reduction was 61% and that of hydrostatic reduction was 44% (P=0.036). Multivariable analysis and adjusting of the factors by propensity scores were performed; the success rate of pneumatic reduction was 1.48 times more than that of hydrostatic reduction (P=0.036, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.03–2.13).ConclusionBoth pneumatic and hydrostatic reduction can be performed safely according to the experience of the radiologist or pediatric surgeon and hospital setting. This study showed that pneumatic reduction had a higher success rate than hydrostatic reduction.
The pathogenesis of intussusception without obvious anatomical leading points remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine a feasibility of association between certain gastroenteritis viruses and intussusception. This was a prospective cohort study. Forty intussusception cases and 136 acute gastroenteritis controls with comparable age and gender were separately consecutively enrolled and relevant clinical data of both groups were recorded. The clinical specimens collected from all patients were screened for adenovirus, rotavirus, norovirus, and astrovirus by PCR and RT-PCR using specific primers. The genomes of detected viruses were characterized further to identify their genotypes by nucleotide sequencing. In 40 intussusception cases, adenovirus, rotavirus, and norovirus were detected in 12 (30.0%), 2 (5.0%), and 2 (5.0%), respectively while astrovirus was undetectable. In contrast, 136 acute gastroenteritis patients, adenovirus, rotavirus, and norovirus were detected in 11 (8.1%), 24 (17.7%), and 24 (17.7%) patients, respectively and again astrovirus was undetectable. The detection of adenovirus in intussusception patients was significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.001) with an odd ratio of 4.87 (95%CI: 1.95, 12.16). Interestingly, molecular analysis of adenovirus genome demonstrated that all of adenovirus detected in intussusception patients belonged to adenovirus C. This could be a potential risk factor or pathogenesis for developing intussusception in the cases of those without apparent anatomical leading points. J. Med. Virol. 88:1930-1935, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The epidemiology of choledochal cysts in Thai children was similar to cases reported from other regions. Early diagnosis and treatment, particularly in children under 2 years of age, should be emphasized, because these patients are at a higher risk for development of chronic liver disease and poor outcome.
Gastrointestinal cytomegalovirus disease can result in serious life-threatening complications, such as bowel perforation and massive gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients with chronic diarrhea and fever of unidentified cause might benefit from gastrointestinal endoscopy for early diagnosis and treatment. Although ganciclovir does not eradicate the infection and relapses are frequent, this treatment can prevent complications and reduce morbidity.
The aim of this study was to reassess the accuracy of the triangular cord sign, the triangular cord sign coupled with abnormal gall-bladder length, and an irregular gall-bladder wall in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. The ultrasonograms of 46 infants with cholestatic jaundice were reviewed for the triangular cord sign, gall-bladder length and gall-bladder wall without knowledge of the clinical data. Of the 23 infants with biliary atresia, 22 had the triangular cord sign whereas 17 infants with other causes of cholestatic jaundice did not have the triangular cord sign. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of the triangular cord sign in the diagnosis of biliary atresia were 95.7, 73.9, 84.8 and 78.6%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of the triangular cord sign coupled with abnormal gall-bladder length in the diagnosis of biliary atresia were all 95.7%. Gall-bladder wall irregularity was seen in seven of 14 infants (50%) with biliary atresia whose gall bladders contained bile on ultrasound and in two of 22 infants (9.1%) without biliary atresia whose gall bladders contained bile on ultrasound. At the medical centre where this study was performed and where infants present with cholestatic jaundice at an advanced stage, the ultrasonographic triangular cord sign coupled with abnormal gall-bladder length is more reliable than the ultrasonographic triangular cord sign alone or gall-bladder wall irregularity in the diagnosis of biliary atresia.
PurposeThe nonoperative reduction of intussusception in children can be performed safely if there are no contraindications. Many risk factors associated with failed reduction were defined. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system for predicting the failure of nonoperative reduction using various determinants.Patients and methodsThe data were collected from Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with intussusception aged 0–15 years with no contraindications for nonoperative reduction. The clinical prediction rules were developed using significant risk factors from the multivariable analysis.ResultsA total of 170 patients with intussusception were included in the study. In the final analysis model, 154 patients were used for identifying the significant risk factors of failure of reduction. Ten factors clustering by the age of 3 years were identified and used for developing the clinical prediction rules, and the factors were as follows: body weight <12 kg (relative risk [RR] =1.48, P=0.004), duration of symptoms >48 hours (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side RR =1.48, P<0.001), ultrasound showed poor prognostic signs (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and the method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic, RR =1.34, P=0.023). Prediction scores ranged from 0 to 16. A high-risk group (scores 12–16) predicted a greater chance of reduction failure (likelihood ratio of positive [LR+] =18.22, P<0.001). A low-risk group (score 0–11) predicted a lower chance of reduction failure (LR+ =0.79, P<0.001). The performance of the scoring model was 80.68% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve).ConclusionThis scoring guideline was used to predict the results of nonoperative reduction and forecast the prognosis of the failed reduction. The usefulness of these prediction scores is for informing the parents before the reduction. This scoring system can be used as a guide to promote the possible referral of the cases to tertiary centers with facilities for nonoperative reduction if possible.
Intussusception in a premature baby is a rare condition. We report a male preterm infant, who developed abdominal distension and abdominal wall erythema. He was operated with suspicion of NEC but an ileo-ileal intussusception and intestinal perforation were encountered at operation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.