Dysglycemia, in this survey defined as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes, is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. This European survey investigated dysglycemia screening and risk factor management of patients with CAD in relation to standards of European guidelines for cardiovascular subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The European Society of Cardiology's European Observational Research Programme (ESC EORP) European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) V (2016-2017) included 8,261 CAD patients, aged 18-80 years, from 27 countries. If the glycemic state was unknown, patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and measurement of glycated hemoglobin A 1c. Lifestyle, risk factors, and pharmacological management were investigated. RESULTS A total of 2,452 patients (29.7%) had known diabetes. OGTT was performed in 4,440 patients with unknown glycemic state, of whom 41.1% were dysglycemic. Without the OGTT, 30% of patients with type 2 diabetes and 70% of those with IGT would not have been detected. The presence of dysglycemia almost doubled from that selfreported to the true proportion after screening. Only approximately one-third of all coronary patients had completely normal glucose metabolism. Of patients with known diabetes, 31% had been advised to attend a diabetes clinic, and only 24% attended. Only 58% of dysglycemic patients were prescribed all cardioprotective drugs, and use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (3%) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (1%) was small. CONCLUSIONS Urgent action is required for both screening and management of patients with CAD and dysglycemia, in the expectation of a substantial reduction in risk of further cardiovascular events and in complications of diabetes, as well as longer life expectancy.

IntroductionLeft ventricular remodeling (LVR) is the most prognostically important consequence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of the study was to assess the value of speckle tracking echocardiography in the prediction of left ventricular remodeling in patients after AMI and primary coronary angioplasty (PCI).Material and methodsEighty-eight patients (F/M = 31/57 patients; 63.6 ±11 years old) with coronary artery disease (CAD) and successful PCI were enrolled and divided into group I with ST-elevation myocardial infarction or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and group II with stable angina pectoris. Conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography was performed 3 days (baseline), 30 days and 90 days after PCI. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of LVR (increase of LV end-diastolic and/or end-systolic volume > 20%) at 3 months follow-up.ResultsAt initial presentation, 2-chamber longitudinal strain (9.4 ±3.5% vs. –11.6 ±3.6%, p < 0.04) and 4-chamber transverse strain (10.4 ±8.2% vs. 15.6 ±8%, p < 0.003) were lower in the LVR+ group compared to the LVR– group. LV wall motion score index did not differ between the two groups. After 30 days, circumferential apical and basal strain (–15.58 ±8.9% vs. –25.53 ±8.8%, p < 0.001; –15.02 ±5.6 vs. –19.78 ±6.3, p < 0.008), radial apical strain (9.96 ±8.4% vs. 14.15 ±5.5%, p < 0.03), 4-chamber longitudinal strain (–8.7 ±5.8% vs. –13.47 ±3.9%, p < 0.005), 4-chamber transverse strain (10.5 ±8.1% vs. 16.7 ±8.3%, p < 0.03), apical rotation (3.84 ±2.5° vs, 5.66 ±3.2°, p < 0.04) and torsion (6.15 ±4.1° vs. 8.98 ±4.6°, p < 0.03) were significantly decreased in the LVR+ group compared to the LVR– group. According to ROC analysis, circumferential apical strain > –15.92% (sensitivity 93%, specificity 59%, positive predictive value 90%) was the most powerful predictor of remodeling after primary PCI in AMI.ConclusionsOur results suggest that impaired indices of LV deformation detected 3 days and 30 days after AMI may provide important predictive value in LV remodeling and patients’ follow-up.

The assessment of LV function with STE may improve cardiovascular risk prediction in postmyocardial infarction patients.

No abstract