Background Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.Methods ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.

Background: Carotid flow velocity criteria are well established, with age being a factor influencing measurements. However, there are no volumetric standards for the flow in extracranial arteries. The aim of the study was related to volumetric flow assessment of extracranial arteries in a healthy population >65 years old. Methods: Doppler volumetric measurements of internal carotid (ICA), external carotid (ECA) and vertebral arteries (VA) were performed in 123 healthy volunteers >65 years old and compared with 56 healthy volunteers <65 years old. Results: The continuous decline in cerebral blood flow (CBF) volume was observed (p < 0.00001). Volumetric reference values were established in study groups: 1., 65–69 years: 898.5 ± 119.1; 2., 70–74 years: 838.5 ± 148.9; 3., 75–79 years: 805.1 ± 99.3; 4., >80 years: 685.7 ± 112.3 (mL/min). Significant differences were observed between groups: 1 and 3.4, as well as 3 and 4 (p = 0.0295, < 0.000001, 0.00446 respectively). CBF volume decreases gradually with age: 28–64 years—6.2 mL/year (p = 0.0019), 65–75 years—11.4 mL/year (p = 0.0121) and >75 years—14.3 mL/year (p = 0.0074). This is a consequence of flow volume decline in ICA (p = 0.00001) and to lesser extent ECA (p = 0.0011). The decrease of peak systolic (p = 0.002) and end diastolic (p = < 0.00001) velocities in ICA and peak systolic velocity in ECA (p = 0.0017) were observed. Conclusions: CBF decreases with ageing. Volumetric assessment of CBF may play an important additional role in diagnostics of patients with carotid stenosis. Doppler assessment of cerebral flow volume may create an interesting tool for identifying patients with diminished cerebrovascular reserve and higher risk of ischemic symptoms occurrence.

Aim: An assessment of increased compensatory blood flow in the brain-supplying arteries in patients with significant carotid artery stenosis. Materials and methods: Doppler ultrasound was performed in 218 patients over 60 years of age to evaluate both the degree of brain-supplying artery stenosis as well as the blood flow volume balance in all vessels supplying the brain: the internal carotid artery, the external carotid artery and the vertebral artery. The control group included 94 patients with no stenosis in the extracranial segments and no neurological manifestations, in whom blood flow values were calculated (the internal carotid artery – 290 mL/min, the external carotid artery – 125 mL/min, the vertebral artery – 80 mL/min); the total mean blood flow in the brain-supplying arteries was 985 mL/min. A 33% increase in blood flow was considered compensatory. In addition to the control group, 30 patients with asymptomatic stenosis of less than 50% and 12 patients after endarterectomy with mean blood flow of 920 mL/min and 960 mL/min, as well as two groups of particular interest to us, i.e. 38 patients with no compensatory blood flow increase despite significant stenosis (>50%) with mean blood flow of 844 mL/min and 44 patients with similar stenosis and with compensatory blood flow increase up to 1174 mL/min were included in the analysis. Results: Comparison of the two groups showed several significant differences: increased blood flow (118% vs. 86% of the norm) in patients with compensated stenosis, an increased number of asymptomatic patients (70% vs. 37%) and a threefold increase in the number of patients with occlusions (15 : 5) in the group of patients with increased blood supply to the brain. Conclusions: All potential blood-supplying vessels, including the external carotid artery, are involved in brain tissue perfusion in some of the patients with significant stenosis. Determining the degree of compensation may have an important impact on the indications for surgical treatment, which will make a valuable contribution to the current criteria (asymptomatic/symptomatic patients).

Introduction: The current treatment of venous disease is focused on reflux elimination in main venous trunks, especially in the saphenous vein. However, a high recurrence rate, independent of the method of treatment, suggests that the reason of low effectiveness may be due to a strategy focused on symptoms, without considering their origin. Method: The aim of study was the comparison of retrospective data from 535 women with venous disease, either after treatment (n = 183) or not treated before (n = 352). The analysis concerned clinical symptoms and the results of the extended diagnostics, including the examination of the lower limb, pelvic and abdominal veins either using duplex-doppler ultrasound as well as venography with computed tomography or magnetic resonance. Results: The comparison of selected venous system parameters revealed more advanced disease progression in previously treated patients, compared to non-treated individuals (e.g., ipsi- or bilateral incompetence of sapheno-phemoral junction—29.5% vs. 20.4%, at P < 0.05 and 13.6% vs. 7.7% at P < 0.05, respectively). This difference could be explained by post-treatment alterations in the venous system, an older age and the higher number of pregnancies in the recurrence group. However, both groups did not differ in regards to the symptoms of pelvic venous insufficiency or the frequency of relevant variants/abnormalities in venous system. Conclusions: Based on the aforementioned findings, we postulate the revision of treatment strategy, which should consider abdominal and pelvic veins as the source of reflux in many female subjects.

Carotid clamping time may be a novel risk factor for early restenosis.