We investigate the hypothesis that, in Escherichia coli, while the concentration of RNA polymerases differs in different growth conditions, the fraction of RNA polymerases free for transcription remains approximately constant within a certain range of these conditions. After establishing this, we apply a standard model-fitting procedure to fully characterize the in vivo kinetics of the rate-limiting steps in transcription initiation of the Plac/ara-1 promoter from distributions of intervals between transcription events in cells with different RNA polymerase concentrations. We find that, under full induction, the closed complex lasts ∼788 s while subsequent steps last ∼193 s, on average. We then establish that the closed complex formation usually occurs multiple times prior to each successful initiation event. Furthermore, the promoter intermittently switches to an inactive state that, on average, lasts ∼87 s. This is shown to arise from the intermittent repression of the promoter by LacI. The methods employed here should be of use to resolve the rate-limiting steps governing the in vivo dynamics of initiation of prokaryotic promoters, similar to established steady-state assays to resolve the in vitro dynamics.

Using a single-RNA detection technique in live Escherichia coli cells, we measure, for each cell, the waiting time for the production of the first RNA under the control of PBAD promoter after induction by arabinose, and subsequent intervals between transcription events. We find that the kinetics of the arabinose intake system affect mean and diversity in RNA numbers, long after induction. We observed the same effect on Plac/ara-1 promoter, which is inducible by arabinose or by IPTG. Importantly, the distribution of waiting times of Plac/ara-1 is indistinguishable from that of PBAD, if and only if induced by arabinose alone. Finally, RNA production under the control of PBAD is found to be a sub-Poissonian process. We conclude that inducer-dependent waiting times affect mean and cell-to-cell diversity in RNA numbers long after induction, suggesting that intake mechanisms have non-negligible effects on the phenotypic diversity of cell populations in natural, fluctuating environments.

No abstract

We studied the behaviour of the repressilator at 28 °C, 30 °C, 33 °C, and 37 °C. From the fluorescence in each cell over time, we determined the period of oscillations, the functionality (fraction of cells exhibiting oscillations) and the robustness (fraction of expected oscillations that occur) of this circuit. We show that the oscillatory dynamics differs with temperature. Functionality is maximized at 30 °C. Robustness decreases beyond 30 °C, as most cells exhibit 'failed' oscillations. These failures cause the distribution of periods to become bimodal, with an 'apparent period' that is minimal at 30 °C, while the true period decreases with increasing temperature. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that the failures are due to a loss of functionality of one protein of the repressilator, CI. To test this, we studied the kinetics of a genetic switch, formed by the proteins CI and Cro, whose expression is controlled by PRM and PR, respectively. By probing the activity of PRM by in vivo detection of MS2-GFP tagged RNA, we find that, beyond 30 °C, the production of the CI-coding RNA changes from sub-Poissonian to super-Poissonian. Given this, we suggest that the decrease in efficiency of CI as a repressor with temperature hinders the robustness of the repressilator beyond 30 °C. We conclude that the repressilator is sensitive but not robust to temperature. Replacing CI for a less temperature-dependent protein should enhance robustness.