AimThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of additional (two versus one session) basic life support (BLS) training of university students on knowledge and attitude concerning the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.MethodsA total of 439 students in three separate groups were tested: those with no prior BLS training; BLS training in high school (part of the driver's education course); and BLS training in high school (in the driver's education course) and additional BLS training at the university.ResultsOur study showed the best results of BLS education in a group of university students who took an additional BLS module approximately half a year after the driver's education BLS course. In our study we observed equal levels of knowledge between the group with BLS training in high school and the group without any formal BLS education. The questionnaire revealed a disappointing level of knowledge about BLS in both groups.ConclusionAdditional basic life support training (two BLS training sessions: high school and university) improves retention of knowledge and attitudes concerning performing CPR in first year university students.
Introduction Countries, severly hit by COVID-19 pandemic in spring 2020, reported reduced admissions and increased mortality of STEMI patients. The first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia was mild, but in the second wave (October to December 2020) COVID-19 cases and fatalities significantly increased. To overcome the pandemic, restrictions to full lockdown, rapid redeployment and mobilization of healthcare resources, as well as reduction or delayed hospital admissions for acute non-communicable conditions were were undertaken. Purpose To evaluate STEMI admissions, the delay in treatment, complications and mortality of STEMI patients in the first and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic and comparison of data to 3 months (March-May) in 2019. Methods We retrospectively analysed the data of STEMI patients, admitted in March to May 2019 and in the first (March-May) and in the second wave (October-December) of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We compared STEMI admissions, age, gender, comorbidities, time to primary coronary intervention (PPCI), the rate of PPCI, TIMI III flow after PPCI, prior resuscitations, hospital complications such as heart failure, arrhythmias, bleedings, acute kidney injury and mortality between 2019 and both waves of COVID-19 pandemic. Results Between STEMI patients in 2019 and patients in the first and the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic there were nonsignificant differences in STEMI admissions (90 patients vs 96 patients vs 81 patients), in gender, age, comorbidities, the rate of primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI, 94.4% vs 94.8% vs 91.4%), TIMI III flow after PPCI, anterior STEMI, in prior resuscitations (10% vs 10.4% vs 16%). Compared to 2019, admission acute heart failure was nonsignificantly increased in COVID-19 pandemic (30% vs 34.4% vs 39.5%). Within the first 3 hours of STEMI PPCI was performed nonsignificantly less likely in the first wave and significantly less likely in the second wave (35.5%* vs 30.2% vs 19.8%*, *p=0.037) in comparison to 2019. The incidence of acute kidney injury was similar in the first wave, but nonsignificantly increased in the second wave (6.6% vs 5.2% vs 9.8%), compared to 2019 and hospital infection was nonsignificantly increased in both COVID-19 periods (15.6% vs 20.8% vs 27.2%). In hospital heart failure was nonsignificantly increased in the first wave and significantly increased in the second one (23.3%* vs 27.1% vs 42%*, *p=0.015), as well as mitral regurgitation (10%* vs 18.8% vs 26.9%*, *p=0.008). Hospital mortality was nonsignificantly increased in bothe waves of the pandemic (8.9% vs 9.4% vs 13.6%). Conclusions In paralell to the increased severity of COVID-19 pandemic in the second wave there was less STEMI admissions, significantly less timely performed PPCI with significantly increased hospital heart failure, resulting in nonsignificantly increased hospital mortality. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction: Application of oxygen at high flows via nasal cannula can be used in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and to prevent reintubation. It is well tolerated by the patients and has been associated with lower mortality. However, there is very little data on the use of oxygen at high flows connected to tracheal cannula (HFOTC). Case presentation: We present two patients in whom weaning from mechanical ventilation was difficult and we decided to use HFOTC for weaning. Weaning from mechanical ventilation with HFOTC was successful in both patients and they tolerated long term (4 and 2 days, respectively) ventilatory support with HFOTC without adverse effects. Conclusions: HFOTC might be used during weaning from mechanical ventilation, however, more data is needed to determine the optimal use of this treatment option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.