BackgroundA major toxicity concern in radioembolization therapy of hepatic malignancies is radiation-induced pneumonitis and sclerosis due to hepatopulmonary shunting of 90Y microspheres. Currently, 99mTc macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) imaging is used to estimate the lung shunt fraction (LSF) prior to treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy/precision of LSF estimated from 99mTc planar and SPECT/CT phantom imaging, and within this context, to compare the corresponding LSF and lung-absorbed dose values from 99mTc-MAA patient studies. Additionally, LSFs from pre- and post-therapy imaging were compared.ResultsA liver/lung torso phantom filled with 99mTc to achieve three lung shunt values was scanned by planar and SPECT/CT imaging with repeat acquisitions to assess accuracy and precision. To facilitate processing of patient data, a workflow that relies on SPECT and CT-based auto-contouring to define liver and lung volumes for the LSF calculation was implemented. Planar imaging-based LSF estimates for 40 patients, obtained from their medical records, were retrospectively compared with SPECT/CT imaging-based calculations with attenuation and scatter correction. Additionally, in a subset of 20 patients, the pre-therapy estimates were compared with 90Y PET/CT-based measurements.In the phantom study, improved accuracy in LSF estimation was achieved using SPECT/CT with attenuation and scatter correction (within 13% of the true value) compared with planar imaging (up to 44% overestimation). The results in patients showed a similar trend with planar imaging significantly overestimating LSF compared to SPECT/CT. There was no correlation between lung shunt estimates and the delay between 99mTc-MAA administration and scanning, but off-target extra hepatic uptake tended to be more likely in patients with a longer delay. The mean lung absorbed dose predictions for the 28 patients who underwent therapy was 9.3 Gy (range 1.3–29.4) for planar imaging and 3.2 Gy (range 0.4–13.4) for SPECT/CT. For the patients with post-therapy imaging, the mean LSF from 90Y PET/CT was 1.0%, (range 0.3–2.8). This value was not significantly different from the mean LSF estimate from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT (mean 1.0%, range 0.4–1.6; p = 0.968), but was significantly lower than the mean LSF estimate based on planar imaging (mean 4.1%, range 1.2–15.0; p = 0.0002).ConclusionsThe improved accuracy demonstrated by the phantom study, agreement with 90Y PET/CT in patient studies, and the practicality of using auto-contouring for liver/lung definition suggests that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT with scatter and attenuation corrections should be used for lung shunt estimation prior to radioembolization.
Background Our goal is to quantitatively compare radiotracer biodistributions within tumors and major normal organs on pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET to post-therapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).Methods PET/CT at ~ 60 min postinjection of Ga-68 DOTATATE and research 177 Lu-SPECT/CT imaging ~ at 4 h (SPECT1) and ~ 24 h (SPECT2) post-cycle#1 were available. Manual contours of lesions on baseline CT or MRI were applied to co-registered SPECT/CT and PET/CT followed by deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation of organs. Tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNR) were calculated from standardized uptake values (SUV) mean and SUV peak for tumor, and SUV mean for non-tumoral liver (nliver), spleen and kidney.Results There were 90 lesons in 24 patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. The correlation between PET and SPECT SUV TNRs were poor/moderate: PET versus SPECT1 R 2 = 0.19, 0.21, 0.29; PET versus SPECT2 R 2 = 0.06, 0.16, 0.33 for TNR nliver ,TNR spleen ,TNR kidney , respectively. Across all patients, the average value of the TNR measured on PET was significantly lower than on SPECT at both time points (P < 0.001). Using SUV mean for tumor, average TNR values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were PET: TNR nliver = 3.5 [CI: 3.0-3.9], TNR spleen = 1.3 [CI, 1.2-1.5], TNR kidney = 1.7 [CI: 1.6-1.9]; SPECT1: TNR nliver = 10 [CI: 8.2-11.7], TNR spleen = 2.9 [CI: 2.5-3.4], TNR kidney = 2.8 [CI: 2.3-3.3]; SPECT2: TNR nliver = 16.9 [CI: 14-19.9], TNR spleen = 3.6 [CI: 3-4.2], TNR kidney = 3.6 [CI: 3.0-4.2]. Comparison of PET and SPECT results in a sphere phantom study demonstrated that these differences are not attributed to imaging modality.Conclusions Differences in TNR exist for the theranostic pair, with significantly higher SUV TNR on 177 Lu SPECT compared with 68 Ga PET. We postulate this phenomenon is due to temporal differences in DOTATATE uptake and internalization in tumor as compared to normal organs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.