No abstract

Authors' Contributions 1.JF -Substantial contributions to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the work, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 2.AO -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 3.TP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 4.SW -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 5.AL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 6.NL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 7.AB -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 8.RP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 9.LK -Substantial revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 10.SG -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 11.IP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 12.IQ -Substantial contributions to revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 13.RJ -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable ...

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system Langerhans cell histiocytosis (CNS-LCH) brain involvement may include mass lesions and/or a neurodegenerative disease (LCH-ND) of unknown etiology. The goal of this study was to define the mechanisms of pathogenesis that drive CNS-LCH. METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers including CSF proteins and extracellular BRAFV600E DNA were analyzed in CSF from patients with CNS-LCH lesions compared with patients with brain tumors and other neurodegenerative conditions. Additionally, the presence of BRAFV600E was tested in peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMCs) as well as brain biopsies from LCH-ND patients, and the response to BRAF-V600E inhibitor was evaluated in 4 patients with progressive disease. RESULTS: Osteopontin was the only consistently elevated CSF protein in patients with CNS-LCH compared with patients with other brain pathologies. BRAFV600E DNA was detected in CSF of only 2/20 (10%) cases, both with LCH-ND and active lesions outside the CNS. However, BRAFV600E+ PBMCs were detected with significantly higher frequency at all stages of therapy in LCH patients who developed LCH-ND. Brain biopsies of patients with LCH-ND demonstrated diffuse perivascular infiltration by BRAFV600E+ cells with monocyte phenotype (CD14+CD33+CD163+P2RY12−) and associated osteopontin expression. Three of 4 patients with LCH-ND treated with BRAF-V600E inhibitor experienced significant clinical and radiologic improvement. CONCLUSION: In LCH-ND patients, BRAFV600E+ cells in PBMCs and infiltrating myeloid/monocytic cells in the brain is consistent with LCH-ND as an active demyelinating process arising from a mutated hematopoietic precursor from which LCH lesion CD207+ cells are also derived. Therapy directed against myeloid precursors with activated MAPK signaling may be effective for LCH-ND.

Background Existing therapies for recurrent or refractory histiocytoses, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD), have limited effectiveness. We report our experience with using clofarabine as therapy in children with recurrent or refractory histiocytic disorders, including LCH (11 patients), systemic JXG (4 patients), and RDD (3 patients). Methods Patients treated with clofarabine for LCH, JXG, or RDD by Texas Children’s Hospital physicians or collaborators between May 2011 and January 2013 were reviewed for response and toxicity. Results Patients were treated with a median of 3 chemotherapeutic regimens prior to clofarabine. Clofarabine was typically administered at 25 mg/m2/day for five days. Cycles were administered every 28 days for a median of six cycles (range: 2–8 cycles). Seventeen of eighteen patients are alive. All surviving patients showed demonstrable improvement after 2–4 cycles of therapy, with eleven (61%) complete responses, four (22%) partial responses, and two patients still receiving therapy. Five patients experienced disease recurrence, but three of these subsequently achieved complete remission. All patients with JXG and RDD had complete or partial response at conclusion of therapy. Side effects included neutropenia in all patients. Recurring but sporadic toxicities included prolonged neutropenia, severe vomiting, and bacterial infections. Conclusion Clofarabine has activity against LCH, JXG, and RDD in heavily pretreated patients, but prospective multi-center trials are warranted to determine long-term efficacy, optimal dosing, and late toxicity of clofarabine in this population.

No abstract

Background Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) are the most common childhood brain tumor. Progression-free survival (PFS) is much lower than overall survival, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments. Sporadic (without neurofibromatosis type-1) optic pathway and hypothalamic glioma (OPHGs) are often multiply recurrent and cause significant visual deficits. Recently, there has been a prioritization of functional outcomes. Methods We present results from children with recurrent/progressive OPHGs treated on a PBTC phase 2 trial evaluating efficacy of selumetinib, (AZD6244, ARRY-142886) a MEK-1/2 inhibitor. Stratum 4 of PBTC-029 included patients with sporadic recurrent/progressive OPHGs treated with selumetinib at the recommended phase 2 dose (25mg/m 2 /dose BID) for a maximum of 26 courses. Results Twenty-five eligible and evaluable patients were enrolled with a median of 4 (1-11) previous therapies. Six of 25 (24%) had partial response, 14/25 (56%) had stable disease and 5 (20%) had progressive disease while on treatment. The median treatment courses were 26 (2-26); 14/25 patients completed all 26 courses. Two-year PFS was 78 ± 8.5%. Nineteen of 25 patients were evaluable for visual acuity which improved in 4/19 patients (21%), was stable in 13/19 (68%) and worsened in 2/19 (11%). Five of 19 patients (26%) had improved visual fields and 14/19 (74%) were stable. The most common toxicities were grade 1/2 CPK elevation, anemia, diarrhea, headache, nausea/emesis, fatigue, AST and ALT increase, hypoalbuminemia and rash. Conclusions Selumetinib was tolerable and led to responses and prolonged disease stability in children with recurrent/progressive OPHGs based upon radiographic response, PFS and visual outcomes.

Background Medulloblastoma (MB) comprises of four molecular subtypes, Sonic hedgehog (SHH), Wingless (WNT), Groups 3 and 4. WNT‐subtype MBs were found to arise from midline of the brainstem occupying the fourth ventricle while SHH‐subtype occupied the cerebellar hemisphere in a small subset of patients. Procedure We tested this hypothesis in a large cohort of pediatric MBs comprising of all four molecular subtypes. Results We validated in the first comprehensive analysis of tumor location of 60 human MBs representative of the four molecular subtypes, that hemispheric tumors are significantly associated with SHH‐subtype MBs while midline tumors with WNT‐subtype, Group 3 and 4 MBs (P < 0.001). Nearly half of SHH‐subtype MBs were midline. Conclusions Tumor location should not be generalized to MB subtypes. SHH‐subtype MBs are not exclusively hemispheric and hemispheric MBs are not always SHH‐activated. It is imperative to identify subtypes in conjunction with tumor location when exploring currently available targeted therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:1408–1410. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

BACKGROUND: The treatment for childhood intracranial ependymoma includes maximal surgical resection followed by involved-field radiotherapy, commonly in the form of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Proton-beam radiation therapy (PRT) is used at some centers in an effort to decrease long-term toxicity. Although protons have the theoretical advantage of a minimal exit dose to the surrounding uninvolved brain tissue, it is unknown whether they have the same efficacy as photons in preventing local recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from September 2000 to April 2013 was performed. Seventy-nine children with newly diagnosed localized intracranial ependymomas treated with either IMRT (n 5 38) or PRT (n 5 41) were identified, and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 3.7 years for all patients (range, 0.4-18.7 years). There were 54 patients with infratentorial tumors (68% of the total population). Patients treated with PRT were younger (median age, 2.5 vs 5.7 years; P 5.001) and had a shorter median follow-up (2.6 vs 4.9 years; P <.0001). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 67 patients (85%) and was more frequent in the PRT group versus the IMRT group (93% vs 76%; P 5.043). The 3-year PFS rates were 60% and 82% with IMRT and PRT, respectively (P 5.031). CONCLU-SIONS: Children with localized ependymomas treated with PRT have a 3-year PFS rate comparable to that of children treated with IMRT. This analysis suggests that local control is not compromised by the use of PRT. The data also support GTR as the only prognostic factor for PFS.