While risk scores are invaluable tools for adapted preventive strategies, a significant gap exists between predicted and actual event rates. Additional tools to further stratify the risk of patients at an individual level are biomarkers. A surrogate endpoint is a biomarker that is intended as a substitute for a clinical endpoint. In order to be considered as a surrogate endpoint of cardiovascular events, a biomarker should satisfy several criteria, such as proof of concept, prospective validation, incremental value, clinical utility, clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, ease of use, methodological consensus, and reference values. We scrutinized the role of peripheral (i.e. not related to coronary circulation) noninvasive vascular biomarkers for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. Most of the biomarkers examined fit within the concept of early vascular aging. Biomarkers that fulfill most of the criteria and, therefore, are close to being considered a clinical surrogate endpoint are carotid ultrasonography, ankle-brachial index and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; biomarkers that fulfill some, but not all of the criteria are brachial ankle pulse wave velocity, central haemodynamics/wave reflections and C-reactive protein; biomarkers that do no not at present fulfill essential criteria are flow-mediated dilation, endothelial peripheral arterial tonometry, oxidized LDL and dysfunctional HDL. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether a specific vascular biomarker is overly superior. A prospective study in which all vascular biomarkers are measured is still lacking. In selected cases, the combined assessment of more than one biomarker may be required.
The AT(1) antagonist losartan corrected the altered structure and endothelial dysfunction of resistance arteries from patients with essential hypertension, whereas the beta-blocker atenolol had no effect.
Abstract-Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and ␣-tocopherol (vitamin E) have antioxidant properties that could improve redox-sensitive vascular changes associated with hypertension. We determined whether vitamins C and E influence vascular function and structure in hypertension by modulating activity of NADPH oxidase and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Adult stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) were divided into 3 groups: control (C; nϭ6), vitamin C-treated (vit C, 1000 mg/day; nϭ7), and vitamin E-treated (vit E, 1000 IU/day; nϭ8). All rats were fed 4% NaCl. Blood pressure was measured weekly. After 6 weeks of treatment, the rats were killed, and mesenteric arteries were mounted as pressurized preparations. Vascular O 2 Ϫ generation and NADPH oxidase activity were measured by chemiluminescence. Vascular SOD activity and plasma total antioxidant status (TAS) were determined spectrophotometrically. Blood pressure increased from 212Ϯ7 to 265Ϯ6 mm Hg in controls. Treatment prevented progression of hypertension (vit C, 222Ϯ6 to 234Ϯ14 mm Hg; vit E, 220Ϯ9 to 227Ϯ10 mm Hg). Acetylcholine-induced vasodilation was improved (PϽ0.05), and media-to-lumen ratio was reduced (PϽ0.05) in the treated rats. O 2 Ϫ was lower in vitamin-treated groups compared with controls (vit C, 10Ϯ4 nmol · min Ϫ1 · g Ϫ1 dry tissue weight; vit E, 9.6Ϯ3.5 nmol · min Ϫ1 · g Ϫ1 dry tissue weight; C, 21Ϯ9 nmol · min Ϫ1 · g Ϫ1 dry tissue weight; PϽ0.05). Both vitamin-treated groups showed significant improvement (PϽ0.01) in TAS. These effects were associated with decreased activation of vascular NADPH oxidase (vit C, 46Ϯ10; vit E, 50Ϯ9; C, 70Ϯ16 nmol · min Ϫ1 · g Ϫ1 dry tissue weight, PϽ0.05) and increased activation of SOD (vit C, 12Ϯ2; vit E, 8Ϯ1; C, 4.6Ϯ1 U/mg; PϽ0.05). Our results demonstrate that vitamins C and E reduce oxidative stress, improve vascular function and structure, and prevent progression of hypertension in SHRSP. These effects may be mediated via modulation of enzyme systems that generate free radicals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.