Objective: To identify potentially confounding variables for the interpretation of plasma N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Design: Randomly selected subjects filled in a heart failure questionnaire and underwent pulse and blood pressure measurements, ECG, echocardiography, and blood sampling. Setting: Subjects were recruited from four Copenhagen general practices located in the same urban area and were examined in a Copenhagen University Hospital. Patients: 382 women and 290 men in four age groups: 50-59 years (n = 174); 60-69 years (n = 204); 70-79 years (n = 174); and > 80 years (n = 120). Main outcome measures: Associations between the plasma concentration of NT-proBNP and a range of clinical variables. Results: In the undivided study sample, female sex (p < 0.0001), greater age (p < 0.0001), increasing dyspnoea (p = 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01), valvar heart disease (p = 0.002), low heart rate (p < 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% (p < 0.0001), abnormal ECG (p < 0.0001), high log 10 [plasma creatinine] (p = 0.0009), low log 10 [plasma glycosylated haemoglobin A1c] (p = 0.0004), and high log 10 [urine albumin] (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with a high plasma log 10 [plasma NT-proBNP] by multiple linear regression analysis. Conclusions: A single reference interval for the normal value of NT-proBNP is unlikely to suffice. There are several confounders for the interpretation of a given NT-proBNP concentration and at the very least adjustment should be made for the independent effects of age and sex.

This study is the first randomized study to demonstrate that the beta1-blocker metoprolol CR/XL has antiremodeling effects on the LV in patients with chronic heart failure and consequently provides an explanation for the highly significant decrease in mortality from worsening heart failure found in the MERIT-HF trial.

Background-Phase 1 clinical trials of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment after myocardial infarction have indicated that G-CSF treatment is safe and may improve left ventricular function. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous G-CSF injections on left ventricular function in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-Seventy-eight patients (62 men; average age, 56 years) with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were included after successful primary percutaneous coronary stent intervention Ͻ12 hours after symptom onset. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with G-CSF (10 g/kg of body weight) or placebo for 6 days. The primary end point was change in systolic wall thickening from baseline to 6 months determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An independent core laboratory analyzed all MRI examinations. Systolic wall thickening improved 17% in the infarct area in the G-CSF group and 17% in the placebo group (Pϭ1.0). Comparable results were found in infarct border and noninfarcted myocardium. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved similarly in the 2 groups measured by both MRI (8.5 versus 8.0; Pϭ0.9) and echocardiography (5.7 versus 3.7; Pϭ0.7). The risk of severe clinical adverse events was not increased by G-CSF.In addition, in-stent late lumen loss and target vessel revascularization rate in the follow-up period were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions-Bone marrow stem cell mobilization with subcutaneous G-CSF is safe but did not lead to further improvement in ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction compared with the recovery observed in the placebo group.