Object High-grade gliomas (HGGs) and metastasis (MET) are the most common intracranial lesions in neurosurgical routine. Both of them show an invasive growth pattern extending into neural tissue beyond the margins of contrast enhancement on MRI. These “undetected” areas might be the origin of early tumor recurrence. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence provides an additional benefit in detection of invasive tumor compared with intraoperative MRI (iMRI). Methods The authors prospectively enrolled 45 patients harboring contrast-enhancing lesions, in whom gross-total resection was intended. All patients had surgery in which iMRI and 5-ALA–guided resection were used following a specific protocol. First, a typical white light tumor resection was performed. Then, spatial location of residual fluorescence was marked. After that, an iMRI was performed and residual uptake of contrast was marked. Navigated biopsy samples were taken from all marked areas and from additional sites according to the surgeon's judgment. Cross tables and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated, assessing performance of the imaging methods for tumor detection alone and for combined detection of infiltration zone and solid tumor (pathological tissue). Also, correlations of histopathological findings with imaging results were tested using Spearman rho. Results Thirty-four patients with HGGs and 11 with METs were enrolled. Three patients harboring a MET showed no 5-ALA enhancement and were excluded; 127 histopathological samples were harvested in the remaining patients. In HGG, sensitivity for tumor detection was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in 5-ALA (0.85) than in iMRI (0.41). Specificity was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in 5-ALA (0.43) than in iMRI (0.70). For detection of pathological tissue, 5-ALA significantly exceeded iMRI in specificity (0.80 vs 0.60) and sensitivity (0.91 vs 0.66) (p < 0.001). Imaging results of iMRI and 5-ALA did not correlate significantly; only 5-ALA showed a significant correlation with final histopathological diagnosis of the specimen and with typical histopathological features of HGGs. In METs, sensitivity and specificity for tumor detection were equal in 5-ALA and iMRI. Both techniques showed high values for sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.80). The odds ratio for detection of tumor tissue was 12 for both techniques. Concerning pathological tissue, no statistically significant difference was found either. Imaging results of iMRI and 5-ALA correlated significantly (p < 0.022), as with final histopathological diagnosis in METs. Conclusions In METs, due to the rate of nonenhancing lesions, the authors found no additional benefit of 5-ALA compared with iMRI. In HGG, imaging results of 5-ALA and iMRI are significantly different at the border zone; 5-ALA has a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity for tumor detection than Gd-DTPA–enhanced iMRI. For detection of infiltrating tumor at the border of the resection cavity, 5-ALA is superior to Gd-DTPA–enhanced iMRI concerning both sensitivity and specificity. Thus, use of 5-ALA in addition to iMRI might be beneficial to maximize extent of resection. Clinical synergistic effects will be evaluated in a prospective randomized trial.

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive, common brain tumor with poor prognosis. Therefore, this study examines a new therapeutic approach targeting oncogenic and survival pathways combined with common chemotherapeutics. The RIST (rapamycin, irinotecan, sunitinib, temozolomide) and the variant aRIST (alternative to rapamycin, GDC-0941) therapy delineate growth inhibiting effects in established glioblastoma cell lines and primary cultured patient material. These combinations significantly decreased cell numbers and viability compared to inhibitors and chemotherapeutics alone with aRIST being superior to RIST. Notably, RIST/aRIST appeared to be apoptogenic evoked by reduction of anti-apoptotic protein levels of XIAP and BCL-2, with concomitant up-regulation of pro-apoptotic protein levels of p53 and BAX. The treatment success of RIST therapy was confirmed in an orthotopic mouse model. This combination treatment revealed significantly prolonged survival time and drastically reduced the tumor burden by acting anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic. Surprisingly, in vivo, aRIST only marginally extended survival time with tumor volumes comparable to controls. We found that aRIST down-regulates the microvessel density suggesting an insufficient distribution of chemotherapy. Further, alterations in different molecular modes of action in vivo than in vitro suggest, that in vivo RIST therapy may mimic the superior aRIST protocol's pro-apoptotic inhibition of pAKT in vitro. Of note, all substances were administered in therapeutically relevant low doses with no adverse side effects observed. We also provide evidence of the potential benefits of the RIST therapy in a clinical setting. Our data indicates RIST therapy as a novel treatment strategy for glioblastoma achieving significant anti-tumorigenic activity avoiding high-dose chemotherapy.Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor, with a mean overall patient survival time of 12 months. 1 Despite intensive research into new treatment strategies, the overall survival rate has not improved substantially over the last two decades. The most recent major alteration to the standard therapeutic protocol, then consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy, was the addition of temozolomide, an alkylating agent, which increased the mean survival time by approximately four months. 2

Tumor detection using a lioUS is significantly superior to cioUS. Overall test performance in lioUS is comparable with results of iMRI. While, the latter has a higher specificity and a significantly lower sensitivity in comparison with lioUS.

Intraoperative resection control in LGGs using lioUS reaches a degree of accuracy close to iMRI. Test results of lioUS are superior to cioUS. cioUS often fails to discriminate solid tumors from "normal" brain tissue during resection control. Only in lesions <10 cc cioUS does show good accuracy.

No abstract

The objective of the present study is to assess the influence of extent of resection (EoR), use of intraoperative imaging, and awake surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients in a prospective multicenter study. We analyzed 170 surgeries of patients suffering from a HGG. During the first year after resection, HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire C30 and Brain Neoplasm 20 questionnaires. We assessed the influence of EoR; awake surgery; and use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), intraoperative MRI (iMRI), and their combination on sum scores for function and symptoms as well as several neurological single items. In mixed-model analyses, adjustments for age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and eloquent location were performed. In the mixed model, EoR generally did not significantly influence HRQoL (p = 0.10). Yet, patients receiving subtotal resection (STR) vs. patients with biopsy showed significantly better QoL and role and cognitive functions (p = 0.04, p = 0.02, and p < 0.01, respectively). The combination of iMRI and 5-ALA reached the highest EoR (95%) followed by iMRI alone (94%), 5-ALA alone (74%), and no imaging (73%). Thereby, neurological symptoms were lowest and functioning score highest after combined use of iMRI and 5-ALA, without reaching significance (p = 0.59). Despite lower scores in emotional function (59 vs. 46, p = 0.24), no significant impact of awake surgery on HRQoL was found (p = 0.70). In HGG patients, STR compared to biopsy was significantly associated with better HRQoL and fewer neurological symptoms in this series. An escalated use of intraoperative imaging increased EoR with stable or slightly better HRQoL and fewer neurological symptoms. Based on HRQoL, awake surgery was a well-tolerated and safe method in our series.

No abstract

Background World Health Organization (WHO) grade II low-grade gliomas (LGGs) in adults are rare, and patients' mean overall survival (OS) is relatively long. Epidemiological data on factors influencing tumor genesis and progression are scarce, and prospective data on surgical management are still lacking. Because of the molecular heterogeneity of LGG, a comprehensive molecular characterization is required for any clinical and epidemiological research. Further, a detailed radiologic assessment is needed as the only established objective criterion for progressive disease. Both radiologic and molecular assessments have to be standardized to produce comparable data. The aim of the registry is to improve the evidence for surgical management of LGG patients by establishing a multicenter registry with a strong surgical and clinical focus including mandatory biobanking. Methods The LoG-Glio project is a prospective national observational multicenter registry that began on November 1, 2015. Inclusion criteria encompass all patients > 18 years of age with a radiologic suspicion of LGG. Patients with severe neurologic or psychiatric disorders that may interfere with their informed consent or if there is no possibility for further follow-up are excluded. Diagnosis of glioblastoma WHO grade IV isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type leads to a secondary exclusion of patients. In addition to demographic data, results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, add-on for patients with brain tumors, and National Health Institute Stroke Scale before and after surgery and during regular follow-ups are collected. At each time point a detailed recording of surgical and adjuvant treatment is performed. Radiologic assessment involves three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of T1, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2 sequences. For the final evaluation, a central detailed neuropathologic and molecular assessment of tumor samples and a radiologic evaluation of imaging sets are part of the study protocol. Results We report the first 100 consecutively registered patients for LoG-Glio. Three patients dropped out due to loss of follow-up. Of the remaining recruited patients, 8 were classified as wait and scan; 89 had surgery. Using the inclusion criteria described previously, 70 patients had an IDH-mutated glioma, 10 had miscellaneous rare LGGs, and 8 patients had an IDH wild-type WHO grade II or III glioma. Conclusion The LoG-Glio registry has been successfully implemented. Applied selection criteria result in an appropriately balanced patient cohort. Short-term outcome data on epidemiology as well as the influence of current surgical techniques and adjuvant treatment on patient outcomes are expected. In the long run, the aim of the registry is to validate the new molecular-based WHO classification and the influence of the extent of resection on progression-free survival and OS. The registry provides an open platform for future research projects benefiting patients with LGG.