In 1980 Gauderer et al.1 described a pull‐through technique to position a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Recognized complications are pulmonary aspiration, peritonitis and haemorrhage. Longer term problems include peristomal wound infection, gastrocolic fistula and frequent tube blockage. The reported overall mortality rate is less than 1 per cent2,3.
ObjectiveTo assess the usage of cranial computed tomography (CT) in patients admitted with meningitis.DesignRetrospective study.SettingHeart of England NHS foundation trust, a teaching hospital in the West Midlands.ParticipantsTwo groups of adult patients admitted with meningitis between April 2001 and September 2004 and from September 2006 until September 2009.Main outcome measuresThe numbers of patients having cranial CT and lumbar puncture and whether any complications had arisen following lumbar puncture. The appropriateness of the CT request according to local criteria.ResultsA total of 111 patients were admitted in the initial time period and 47 patients in the second time period. In the first group, 67 patients underwent CT (61%), compared with 36 patients (80%) in the second group. There were eight abnormal scans (12%) in the initial group including three patients with radiological features of cerebral oedema. Of these patients, one underwent lumbar puncture and had no neurological sequelae. In the second group, there were five abnormal scans (14%) with one presenting a contraindication for lumbar puncture due to mild ventricular dilatation. A lumbar puncture was performed in this patient without complication. All patients with abnormal scans had clinical features to suggest raised intracranial pressure. CT scan requests were considered inappropriate in 26% of patients in the initial study period and 56% of patients in the second study period.ConclusionMore patients with meningitis are undergoing CT and the number of inappropriate requests are increasing. There are few abnormal CT scans presenting a contraindication for lumbar puncture and the majority of these patients usually have clinical signs to suggest raised intracranial pressure.
Background Current sepsis screening tools are predominantly based on vital signs. However, patients with serious infections frequently present with normal vital signs and there has been an increased interest to include other variables such as symptoms in screening tools to detect sepsis. The majority of patients with sepsis arrive to the emergency department by emergency medical services. Our hypothesis was that the presentation of sepsis, including symptoms, may differ between patients arriving to the emergency department by emergency medical services and patients arriving by other means. This information is of interest to adapt future sepsis screening tools to the population in which they will be implemented. The aim of the current study was to compare the prevalence of keywords reflecting the clinical presentation of sepsis based on mode of arrival among septic patients presenting to the emergency department. Methods Retrospective cross-sectional study of 479 adult septic patients. Keywords reflecting sepsis presentation upon emergency department arrival were quantified and analyzed based on mode of arrival, i.e., by emergency medical services or by other means. We adjusted for multiple comparisons by applying Bonferroni-adjusted significance levels for all comparisons. Adjustments for age, gender, and sepsis severity were performed by stratification. All patients were admitted to the emergency department of Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, and discharged with an ICD-10 code compatible with sepsis between January 1, and December 31, 2013. Results “Abnormal breathing” (51.8% vs 20.5%, p value < 0.001), “abnormal circulation” (38.4% vs 21.3%, p value < 0.001), “acute altered mental status” (31.1% vs 13.1%, p value < 0.001), and “decreased mobility” (26.1% vs 10.7%, p value < 0.001) were more common among patients arriving by emergency medical services, while “pain” (71.3% vs 40.1%, p value < 0.001) and “risk factors for sepsis” (50.8% vs 30.8%, p value < 0.001) were more common among patients arriving by other means. Conclusions The distribution of most keywords related to sepsis presentation was similar irrespective of mode of arrival; however, some differences were present. This information may be useful in clinical decision tools or sepsis screening tools.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.