SummaryThe randomized phase III ELOQUENT‐2 study (NCT01239797) evaluated the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab + lenalidomide/dexamethasone (ELd) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Ld) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 30% versus Ld (hazard ratio [HR] 0·70). Median time from diagnosis was 3·5 years. We present extended 3‐year follow‐up data. Endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and interim overall survival (OS). Exploratory post‐hoc analyses included impact of time from diagnosis and prior lines of therapy on PFS, and serum M‐protein dynamic modelling. ORR was 79% (ELd) and 66% (Ld) (P = 0·0002). ELd reduced the risk of disease progression/death by 27% versus Ld (HR 0·73; P = 0·0014). Interim OS demonstrated a trend in favour of ELd (P = 0·0257); 1‐, 2‐ and 3‐year rates with ELd versus Ld were: 91% versus 83%, 73% versus 69% and 60% versus 53%. In patients with ≥ median time from diagnosis and one prior therapy, ELd resulted in a 53% reduction in the risk of progression/death versus Ld (HR 0·47). Serum M‐protein dynamic modelling showed slower tumour regrowth with ELd. Adverse events were comparable between arms. ELd provided a durable and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, with minimal incremental toxicity.

Purpose To evaluate the difference between the pharmaceutical phosphate buffers and the gastrointestinal bicarbonates in dissolution of ketoprofen and indomethacin, to illustrate the dependence of buffer differential on biopharmaceutical properties of BCS II weak acids, and to recommend phosphate buffers equivalent to bicarbonates. Methods The intrinsic dissolution rates of, ketoprofen and indomethacin, were experimentally measured using rotating disk method at 37°C in USP SIF/FaSSIF and various concentrations of bicarbonates. Theoretical models including an improved reaction plane model and a film model were applied to estimate the surrogate phosphate buffers equivalent to the bicarbonates. Results Experimental results show that the intrinsic dissolution rates of ketoprofen and indomethacin, in USP and FaSSIF phosphate buffers are 1.5–3.0 times of that in the 15 mM bicarbonates. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that the buffer differential is largely dependent on the drug pKa and secondly on solubility, and weakly dependent on the drug diffusivity. Further, in accordance with the drug pKa, solubility and diffusivity, simple phosphate surrogate was proposed to match an average bicarbonate value (15 mM) of the upper gastrointestinal region. Specifically, phosphate buffers of 13–15 mM and 3–4 mM were recommended for ketoprofen and indomethacin, respectively. For both ketoprofen and indomethacin, the intrinsic dissolution using the phosphate surrogate buffers closely approximated the 15 mM bicarbonate buffer. Conclusions This work demonstrates the substantial difference between pharmaceutical phosphates and physiological bicarbonates in determining the drug intrinsic dissolution rates of BCS II weak acids, such as ketoprofen and indomethacin. Surrogate phosphates were recommended in order to closely reflect the in vivo dissolution of ketoprofen and indomethacin in gastrointestinal bicarbonates, which has significant implications for defining buffer systems for BCS II weak acids in developing in vitro bioequivalence dissolution methodology.

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the roles of lecithin and bile salts in a new generation of fasted simulated small intestinal fluid (FaSSIF-II), thus enhancing the closer mimic of simulated fluids to the real human intestinal fluids (HIF) in drug discovery and drug product development. To assess the effects of lecithin in FaSSIF-II, solubility studies were conducted at 37 °C using four media including first generation simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF-I), FaSSIF-II, phosphate pH 6.5 buffer, and HIF. A total of 24 model compounds representing a wide range of biopharmaceutic properties were included. The drug solubility values measured in the FaSSIF-II were compared with those in FaSSIF-I, pH 6.5 buffer and HIF. To assess the effects of bile acids, solubility was measured for 4 compounds in the FaSSIF-I containing five different bile acids of various concentrations. The lecithin concentration in the FaSSIF-II is lowered from 0.75 mM to 0.2 mM. The results suggested that the FaSSIF-II is a better medium to reflect HIF, compared with pH 6.5 phosphate buffer and FaSSIF-I. Solubility of neutral compounds including atovaquone, carbamazepine, cyclosporine, danazol, diethylstilbestrol, felodipine, griseofulvin and probucol in FaSSIF-II showed improvement in predicting the in vivo solubility. The relative standard deviation (SD) of solubility measurement in FaSSIF-II is comparable with FaSSIF-I. For the acidic and basic tested compounds, the FaSSIF-II performs similarly to the FaSSIF-I. Experimental results showed that the level of bile salts typically is less than 5 mM under fasted state. Among the five studied bile acids, the conjugation (glycine or taurine) has no impact on the drug solubilization, while there may be a minimal effect of the degree of hydroxylation of the steroid ring system on solubilization. The lecithin concentration of 0.2 mM in FaSSIF-II has been demonstrated to closely represent HIF, for both neutral and ionizable compounds. In the composition of simulated intestinal fluids, the structure of bile acids has minimal effect, providing the flexibility of choosing one bile salt to represent complex in vivo bile acids.

No abstract

Immuno-oncology works through activation of the patient's immune system against cancer, with several advantages over other treatment approaches, including cytotoxic agents and molecular-targeted therapies. The most notable feature of immuno-oncology treatments is the nature of the patient responses achieved, which can be more durable and sustained than with other modalities. Increased understanding of immune system complexity has provided a number of opportunities to advance several strategies for the development of immuno-oncology therapies. This review outlines the clinical pharmacology characteristics and development challenges for the 6 approved immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies that target 2 immune checkpoint pathways: ipilimumab (an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody) and, more recently, nivolumab and pembrolizumab (both anti-programmed death-1 antibodies) and atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab (all anti-programmed death ligand-1 antibodies). These agents have revealed much about the clinical pharmacology features of immune checkpoint inhibitors as a class, as well as the pharmacometric approaches used to support their clinical development and regulatory approval. The development experiences with these pioneering immuno-oncology agents are likely to serve as useful guides in the discovery, progression, and approval of future drugs or combination of drugs in this class. This review includes summaries of the pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of the immune checkpoint inhibitors approved to date, as well as an overview of some quantitative systems pharmacology approaches. The ability of immuno-oncology to meet its full potential will depend on overcoming development challenges, including the need for clear strategies to determine optimal dose and scheduling for monotherapy as well as combination approaches. Keywords immunopharmacology, oncology, clinical pharmacology, clinical trials, pharmacology, immunotherapy, checkpoint inhibitorsIt could be said that if there were a book chronicling the history and progression of cancer treatment, we are now moving on from the chapter describing the time of sole reliance on chemotherapy, the chapter outlining the advent of targeted therapy is partially completed, and a new chapter on immuno-oncology is just beginning. The past few years have seen the regulatory approval of several immuno-oncology agents (Figure 1), including 6 immune checkpoint inhibitors: ipilimumab (Yervoy; Bristol-Myers Squibb), pembrolizumab (Keytruda; Merck), nivolumab (Opdivo; Bristol-Myers Squibb), atezolizumab (Tecentriq; Genentech), avelumab (Bavencio; EMD Serono), and durvalumab (Imfinzi; AstraZeneca). 1,2Immunotherapy in oncology is a switch from the cell-killing modality using relatively nonspecific cytotoxic methods (chemotherapy) or therapies that target cancer-specific pathways to methods that employ the patients' immune system to attack cancer. The immuno-oncology approach calls on the understanding of complex signaling processes of effector and regulatory...

This work was to investigate the effects of particle size and paddle speed on the particle diffusional layer thickness h(app) in a USP dissolution apparatus II. After the determination of the powder dissolution rates of five size fractions of fenofibrate, including <20, 20-32, 32-45, 63-75, and 90-106 microm, the present work shows that the dependence of h(app) on particle size follows different functions in accordance with the paddle speed. At 50 rpm, the function of h(app) is best described by a linear plot of h{app} = 9.91sqrt d-23.31 (R(2) = 0.98) throughout the particle diameter, d, from 6.8 to 106 microm. In contrast, at 100 rpm a transitional particle radius, r, of 23.7 microm exists, under which linear relationship h(app) = 1.59r (R(2) = 0.98) occurs, but above which h(app) becomes a constant of 43.5 microm. Thus, h(app) changes not only with particle size, but also with the hydrodynamics under standard USP configurations, which has been overlooked in the past. Further, the effects of particle size and paddle speed on h(app) were combined using dimensionless analysis. Within certain fluid velocity/particle regime, linear correlation of h(app)/d with the square-root of Reynolds number (d\varpi/upsilon){1/2}, that is, h{app}/d = 1.5207 - 9.25 x 10{- 4} (d\varpi/n){1/2} (R(2) = 0.9875), was observed.

Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of melanoma as monotherapy and for the treatment of melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and colorectal cancer in combination with nivolumab. Ipilimumab time-varying clearance (CL) was assessed by a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model developed using statistically significant covariates identified in a previous PPK analysis plus additional covariates. Data from 3,411 patients who received ipilimumab 0.3-10 mg/kg alone or in combination with nivolumab in 16 clinical trials were analyzed. Ipilimumab CL decreased over time; the change in CL was greater in patients treated with nivolumab combination than ipilimumab alone and in responders vs. nonresponders. Time-varying covariates including body weight, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and performance status were evaluated on change in ipilimumab CL. In addition, ipilimumab CL was similar across different tumor types, nivolumab dosing regimens, and lines of therapy. These data suggest an association of ipilimumab CL with disease severity.

Nivolumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits programmed cell death‐1 activation. To assess covariate effects on nivolumab clearance (CL), a population pharmacokinetics model was developed using data from 6,468 patients with colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or small cell lung cancer who received nivolumab as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab or chemotherapy across 25 clinical studies. Nivolumab CL was similar across the tumor types examined; CL was higher for ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks (by 17%) and 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (by 29%) vs. nivolumab monotherapy. Nivolumab CL over time was partially explained by time‐varying covariates. A greater decrease in nivolumab time‐varying CL was associated with increased albumin and body weight and a responder status. Our findings support the observed association between nivolumab CL and disease severity.