Intensivists made over 100 daily critical care decisions during rounds. The number of decisions was influenced by a variety of patient- and system-related factors and was highly variable among intensivists. Future work is needed to explore effects of the decision-making burden on providers' choices and on patient outcomes.

Uncertainty is a frequent feature of chronic illness and can have a particularly important impact in the case of organ transplantation. This study of 100 women with primary biliary cirrhosis who were either waiting for or had already had a liver transplant focused on both changes in uncertainty with transplant and the correlates of uncertainty both pre- and post-transplant. While those who were post-transplant had significantly lower uncertainty scores (measured by the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale-Adult Version-MUIS-A) than those on the waiting list, uncertainty was still persistent and associated with a reduced quality of life. The most significant factors in relation to uncertainty were fatigue, depression, anxiety, and dissatisfaction with medical information received. It is important for both patients and transplant team members to recognize the impact of uncertainty on a patient's well-being, both before and after a transplant, and to address the underlying factors that continue to compromise quality of life even after a life-saving procedure.

Background Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently leave the hospital as patient directed discharges (PDDs) because of untreated withdrawal and pain. Short-acting opioids can complement methadone, buprenorphine, and non-opioid adjuvants for withdrawal and pain, however little evidence exists for this approach. We described the safety and preliminary outcomes of short-acting opioid agonist treatment (sOAT) for hospitalized patients with OUD at an academic hospital in Philadelphia, PA. Methods From August 2021 to March 2022, a pharmacist guided implementation of a pilot sOAT protocol consisting of escalating doses of oxycodone or oral hydromorphone scheduled every four hours, intravenous hydromorphone as needed, and non-opioid adjuvants for withdrawal and pain. All patients were encouraged to start methadone or buprenorphine treatment for OUD. We abstracted data from the electronic health record into a secure platform. The primary outcome was safety: administration of naloxone, over-sedation, or a fall. Secondary outcomes were PDDs and respective length of stay (LOS), discharges on methadone or buprenorphine, and discharges with naloxone. We compared secondary outcomes to hospitalizations in the 12 months prior to the index hospitalization among the same cohort. Results Of the 23 cases, 13 (56.5%) were female, 19 (82.6%) were 40 years or younger, and 22 (95.7%) identified as White. Twenty-one (91.3%) regularly injected opioids and four (17.3%) were enrolled in methadone or buprenorphine prior to hospitalization. sOAT was administered at median doses of 200–320 morphine milligram equivalents per 24-h period. Naloxone administration was documented once in the operating room, over-sedation was documented once after unsanctioned opioid use, and there were no falls. The PDD rate was 44% with median LOS 5 days (compared to PDD rate 69% with median LOS 3 days for prior admissions), 65% of sOAT cases were discharged on buprenorphine or methadone (compared to 33% for prior admissions), and 65% of sOAT cases were discharged with naloxone (compared to 19% for prior admissions). Conclusions Pilot implementation of sOAT was safe. Compared to prior admissions in the same cohort, the PDD rate was lower, LOS for PDDs was longer, and more patients were discharged on buprenorphine or methadone and with naloxone, however efficacy for these secondary outcomes remains to be established.

Palliative care (PC) longitudinal curricula are increasingly being recognized as important in Undergraduate Medical Education (UME). They are however, not yet commonplace, and where they do exist may be implemented without a systematic, prospective approach to curriculum evaluation. This paper describes an implementation of a new longitudinal curriculum at the Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) at the University of Pennsylvania. We used the Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model, a holistic evaluation model, to assess the local environment, design the curriculum, guide the improvement process, and evaluate outcomes. Comprehensive models such as CIPP provide a more robust approach to curriculum evaluation than outcomes-only models and may be of use to other programs who are implementing new curricula or improving upon existing programs.

Methods. To improve care delivery for our nation's Veterans, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) developed the Diffusion of Excellence Initiative to identify and spread practices developed through quality improvement methods. One such practice is Advance Care Planning via Group Visits (ACP-GV), which uses an interactive and patient-centered group session to engage Veterans in thinking about and planning for future medical decisions. In these sessions, social workers, or other health professionals, facilitate discussions for Veterans and their trusted others. Facilitators emphasize that while completing an advance directive is voluntary, it increases the chance that their care aligns with their wishes and values and relieves trusted others of having to make these difficult decisions. In addition, ACP-GV increases the effectiveness of advance care planning through allowing Veterans to discuss and process these complex topics with other Veterans in a group session. Results. To date, 34 VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) have adopted the ACP-GV practice and more than 10,250 Veterans have attended ACP-GV sessions. Of those participants, approximately 18-20% developed a new advance care directive within one month of the session, and 86% set a smart goal to take additional steps toward advance care planning. Continued rollout of this innovative practice to VAMCs across the nation is ongoing. Conclusions and Implications. At the conclusion of the session, attendees will have practical guidance, techniques and tools for implementation of ACP discussions using group visits in integrated (VA) or feefor-service (Medicare) outpatient settings.