No abstract

The peptide neurotransmitter substance P modulates sensitivity to pain by activating the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor, which is expressed by discrete populations of neurons throughout the central nervous system. Substance P is synthesized by small-diameter sensory 'pain' fibres, and release of the peptide into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord following intense peripheral stimulation promotes central hyperexcitability and increased sensitivity to pain. However, despite the availability of specific NK-1 antagonists, the function of substance P in the perception of pain remains unclear. Here we investigate the effect of disrupting the gene encoding the NK-1 receptor in mice. We found that the mutant mice were healthy and fertile, but the characteristic amplification ('wind up') and intensity coding of nociceptive reflexes was absent. Although substance P did not mediate the signalling of acute pain or hyperalgesia, it was essential for the full development of stress-induced analgesia and for an aggressive response to territorial challenge, demonstrating that the peptide plays an unexpected role in the adaptive response to stress.

Visceral pain is the most common form of pain produced by disease and one of the most frequent reasons why patients seek medical attention. Yet much of what we know about the mechanisms of pain derives from experimental studies of somatic not visceral nociception. The conventional view is that visceral pain is simply a variant of somatic pain, a view based on the belief that a single neurological mechanism is responsible for all pain. However, the more we learn about the mechanisms of somatic and visceral pain, the more we realise that although these two processes have much in common, they also have important differences. Although visceral pain is an important part of the normal sensory repertoire of all human beings and a prominent symptom of many clinical conditions, not much clinical research has been done in this field and there are few clinical scientists with expertise in the management of visceral pain. Instead, visceral pain is usually treated by a range of specialists who take quite different approaches to the management of this type of pain. Thus, the management of visceral pain is frequently unsatisfactory. In this review, we consider visceral pain as a separate form of pain and examine its distinct sensory properties from a clinical perspective. We describe recent research findings that may change the way we think about visceral pain and, more importantly, may help develop new procedures for its management.

The generation of transgenic mice that lack or overexpress genes relevant to pain is becoming increasing common. However, only one visceral pain model, the writhing test, is widely used in mice. Here we describe a novel model, chemical stimulation of the colon, which we have developed in mice. Mice of either sex were injected i.v. with 30 mg/kg Evan's Blue for subsequent determination of plasma extravasation. For behavioural testing, they were placed on a raised grid and 50 microl of saline, mustard oil (0.25-2.5%) or capsaicin (0.03-0.3%) was administered by inserting a fine cannula into the colon via the anus. Visceral pain-related behaviours (licking abdomen, stretching, contractions of abdomen etc) were counted for 20 min. Before intracolonic administration, and 20 min after, the frequency of withdrawal responses to the application of von Frey probes to the abdomen was tested. The colon was removed post-mortem and the Evan's Blue content measured. Mustard oil and capsaicin administration evoked dose-dependent visceral pain behaviours, referred hyperalgesia (significant increase in responses to von Frey hairs) and colon plasma extravasation. The peak behavioural responses were evoked by 0.1% capsaicin and by 1% mustard oil respectively. The nociceptive behavioural responses were dose-dependently reversed by morphine (ED50 = 1.9 +/- 1 mg/kg s.c.). We conclude that this model represents a useful tool both for phenotyping mutant mice and for classical pharmacology since information on visceral pain, referred hyperalgesia and colon inflammation can all obtained from the same animal.

The tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channel alpha subunit Nav1.8 is expressed exclusively in primary sensory neurons and is proposed to play an important role in sensitization of nociceptors. Here we compared visceral pain and referred hyperalgesia in Nav1.8-null mice and their wild-type littermates in five tests that differ in the degree to which behavior depends on spontaneous, ongoing firing in sensitized nociceptors. Nav1.8-null mice showed normal nociceptive behavior provoked by acute noxious stimulation of abdominal viscera (intracolonic saline or intraperitoneal acetylcholine). However, Nav1.8-null mutants showed weak pain and no referred hyperalgesia to intracolonic capsaicin, a model in which behavior is sustained by ongoing activity in nociceptors sensitized by the initial application. Nav1.8-null mice also showed blunted pain and hyperalgesia to intracolonic mustard oil, which sensitizes nociceptors but also provokes tissue damage. To distinguish between a possible role for Nav1.8 in ongoing activity per se and ongoing activity after sensitization in the absence of additional stimuli, we tried a visceral model of tonic noxious chemical stimulation, cyclophosphamide cystitis. Cyclophosphamide produces cystitis by gradual accumulation of toxic metabolites in the bladder. In this model, Nav1.8-null mice showed normal responses. There were no differences between null mutants and their normal littermates in tissue damage and inflammation evoked by any of the stimuli tested, suggesting that the behavioral differences are not secondary to impairment of inflammatory responses. We conclude that there is an essential role for Nav1.8 in mediating spontaneous activity in sensitized nociceptors.

1. Extracellular single-unit recordings have been made from 295 dorsal horn neurons in the lumbar enlargement of rat spinal cord; 191 neurons in 20 rats with an experimental peripheral neuropathy, and 104 in 10 sham-operated rats. Recordings were made 9-11 days after inducing the neuropathy by tying four loose ligatures around the sciatic nerve in the nerve-injured rats or performing a sham procedure in the sham-operated rats. 2. A survey of the general properties of all neurons encountered was made in the 10 sham-operated rats (104 neurons) and compared with those seen in 17 of the nerve-injured animals (180 neurons). The vast majority (87%; 156/180) of neurons recorded in the nerve-injured animals showed abnormal characteristics; these included responses to very gentle mechanical stimulation of the nerve-injury site and to manipulations that resulted in movement of this site such as extension of the leg and probing of the skin and muscle of the thigh (53%), absence of detectable peripheral receptive fields (RFs; 56%), and very high spontaneous activity (7%). In the sham-operated rats none of the neurons recorded could be activated by gentle mechanical stimulation of the sciatic nerve, and only 6% had no detectable peripheral RF. 3. In the nerve-injured animals, 31% (55/180) of cells had both a peripheral RF, and a response to gentle mechanical stimulation of the nerve-injury site. All cells of this type tested (n = 5) showed very prolonged responses (up to 10 min long) to 15 s pinch stimuli applied to the RF and to 15 s gentle tapping of the injury site. The majority of cells in this group were excited by noxious stimuli (71%; 39/55) and had C-fiber inputs (60%; 33/55). 4. The mean threshold temperatures for evoking responses to heat stimuli in cells tested in nerve-injured rats and in sham-operated animals were not different. However, there was a group of neurons in the nerve-injured rats that had low thresholds, failed to encode stimulus intensity, and did not have a C-fiber input. 5. There were significantly fewer neurons excited by low-intensity stimulation of the skin in the nerve-injured (24%; 43/180) than in the sham-operated rats (71%; 74/104). Measurements of mechanical threshold with von Frey hairs showed that, although the mean threshold did not change, none of the cells tested in the nerve-injured animals had thresholds < 12 mN, whereas the lowest threshold recorded in the sham-operated animals was 0.2 mN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The persistent increase in pain sensitivity observed after injury, known as hyperalgesia, depends on synaptic plasticity in the pain pathway, particularly in the spinal cord. Several potential mechanisms have been proposed, including post-synaptic exocytosis of the AMPA subclass of glutamate receptors (AMPA-R), which is known to play a critical role in synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. AMPA-R trafficking has been described in spinal neurons in culture but it is unknown if it can also occur in spinal neurons in vivo, or if it can be induced by natural painful stimulation. Here we have induced referred mechanical hyperalgesia in vivo by intracolonic instillation of capsaicin in mice and have observed a recruitment of GluR1 AMPA-R subunits to neuronal plasma membranes in the lumbar spinal cord. Intracolonic capsaicin induced a rapid (10 min) increase in GluR1, but not GluR2/3 in the synaptosomal membrane fraction which lasted at least 3 h and a decrease in GluR1 subunit in the cytosolic fraction. Capsaicin treatment also provoked CaMKII activation and pre-treatment with a specific CaMKII inhibitor prevented the GluR1 trafficking. Brefeldin-A, an antibiotic that inhibits exocytosis of proteins, not only prevented GluR1 trafficking to the membrane but also inhibited referred hyperalgesia in capsaicin-treated mice. Our results show that delivery of GluR1 AMPA receptor subunits to the cell membrane through a CaMKII activity-dependent exocytotic regulated pathway contributes to the development of hyperalgesia after a painful stimulus. We conclude that AMPA-R trafficking contributes to the synaptic strengthening induced in the pain pathway by natural stimulation.

In this paper we review the current neurophysiological models of touch-evoked pain and present a new proposal that addresses the mechanisms of allodynia. The new model is based on the notion that A-beta mechanoreceptors can gain access to nociceptive neurones by means of a presynaptic link, at central level, between low threshold mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. We propose that the excitation of nociceptors provoked by a peripheral injury activates the spinal interneurones that mediate primary afferent depolarization (PAD) between low threshold mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. As a consequence of the increased and persistent barrage driving these neurones their excitability is increased such that, when activated by low threshold mechanoreceptors from areas surrounding the injury site, they produce a very intense PAD in the nociceptive afferents which is capable of generating spike activity. This activation would be conducted antidromically in the form of dorsal root reflexes (DRRs) but would also be conducted forward activating the second order neurones normally driven by nociceptors. The sensory consequence of this mechanism is pain evoked by the activation of low threshold mechanoreceptors from an area surrounding an injury site (allodynia).