Objectives: Mean arterial pressure is critically important in patients with cirrhosis in the ICU, however, there is limited data to guide therapies and targets. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Tertiary care ICU. Patients: Two hundred and seventy-three critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We performed a comprehensive time-weighted mean arterial pressure analysis (time-weighted-average-mean arterial pressure and cumulative-time-below various mean arterial pressure-thresholds) during the first 24-hours after ICU admission (median: 25 mean arterial pressure measurements per-patient). Time-weighted-average-mean arterial pressure captures both the severity and duration of hypotension below a mean arterial pressure threshold and cumulative-time-below is the total time spent below a mean arterial pressure threshold. Individual univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were assessed for each time-weighted-average-mean arterial pressure and cumulative-time-below mean arterial pressure threshold (55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 mm Hg) for ICU-mortality. Time-weighted-average-mean arterial pressure: for 1 mm Hg decrease in mean arterial pressure below 75, 70, 65, 60, and 55 mm Hg, the odds for ICU-mortality were 14%, 18%, 26%, 41%, and 74%, respectively (p < 0.01, all thresholds). The association between time-weighted-average-mean arterial pressure and ICU-mortality for each threshold remained significant after adjusting for model for end-stage liver disease—sodium score, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, renal replacement therapy, grade 3/4 hepatic encephalopathy, WBC count, and albumin. Cumulative-time-below: odds for ICU-mortality were 4%, 6%, 10%, 12%, and 12% for each-hour spent below 75, 70, 65, 60, and 55 mm Hg, respectively. In the adjusted models, significant associations only remained for mean arterial pressure less than 65 mm Hg (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00–1.14; p = 0.05) and < 60 mm Hg (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01–1.18; p = 0.04). Conclusions: These data suggest that maintaining a mean arterial pressure of greater than 65 mm Hg may be a reasonable target in patients with cirrhosis admitted to the ICU. However, further prospective randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal mean arterial pressure-targets in this patient population.

Excessive alcohol use not only causes alcoholic liver disease (ALD) but also increases the risk of liver-related mortality in patients who already have other chronic liver diseases. Screening for alcohol misuse or alcohol use disorder (AUD) among patients with underlying liver disease is essential. This clinical review covers what is known about ALD, the impact of alcohol in patients with underlying liver diseases, current management of alcohol misuse and AUD, and the management of alcohol misuse and AUD specifically in patients with liver diseases. Several treatment options for alcohol misuse and AUD exist such as psychosocial intervention and behavioral and pharmacological therapies. The strategies used in the treatment of alcohol misuse and AUD are still applicable in those who consume alcohol and have underlying liver disease. However, certain medications still need to be carefully used due to potentially worsening already compromised liver function. Screening of ongoing alcohol use in subjects with liver disease is important, and prompt intervention is needed to prevent the associated morbidity and mortality from the detrimental effects of continued alcohol use on underlying liver disease. Considering alcoholism is a complex disease, probably a multidisciplinary approach combining psychotherapy and comprehensive medical care will be the most effective. Future research could focus on identifying additional treatment options for addressing the psychotherapy component since the self-determination and will to quit drinking alcohol can play such a crucial role in promoting abstinence.

The data on the effect of smoking on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate if an association exists between serum cotinine level (a tobacco biomarker) and NAFLD prevalence in the general US population. We conducted a crosssectional analysis of data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). We included 11,003 adults aged 20–74 years who underwent ultrasonography. Of those, 4036 were identified as having NAFLD and 6967 were recognized as controls. The percentage of current smokers was significantly lower in subjects with NAFLD compared with those in controls (21.5% vs 26.0%, p<0.01). After adjustment for potential confounders, there was no association between current or former smokers with NAFLD. Additionally, no associations were observed between the levels of serum cotinine and NAFLD. No association between serum cotinine levels at each quartile level and NAFLD was observed regardless of smoking status. In this large US population-based study, we did not find an association between NAFLD and self-reported smoking status or measured serum cotinine level.

Renal failure is a challenging problem in patients with cirrhosis since mortality increases with worsening renal function, hence the inclusion of serum creatinine in calculating the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for liver transplant evaluation. Among the various causes, infection is the leading etiology of mortality associated with cirrhosis. Bacterial infection frequently precipitates renal failure in patients with cirrhosis with the reported prevalence around 34%. Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of infections due to impaired immunity and increased gut permeability leading to bacterial translocation in the setting of portal hypertension. One of the most feared complications of severely decompensated liver and renal failure is hepatorenal syndrome, of which liver transplant may be the only available treatment. Furthermore, in those with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and urinary tract infection, progressive renal failure occurs despite resolution of infection. Thus, the effects of endotoxemia on renal function in cirrhosis have become a major focus of research. The mechanisms of the damaging effects of endotoxin on renal function are complex but, in essence, involve dysregulated inflammation, circulatory dysfunction, poor clearance of endotoxin burden, as well as vasomotor nephropathy. In this article, we will review the mechanisms of endotoxemia-induced renal dysfunction in the setting of cirrhosis through the effects on renal blood flow, renal vascular endothelium, glomerular filtration rate, and tubular function.