Previous evidence suggests soy genistein may be protective against prostate cancer, but whether this protection involves an estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent mechanism is unknown. To test the hypothesis that phytoestrogens may act through ERα or ERβ to play a protective role against prostate cancer, we bred transgenic mice lacking functional ERα or ERβ with transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice. Dietary genistein reduced the incidence of cancer in ER wild-type (WT)/transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate mice but not in ERα knockout (KO) or ERβKO mice. Cancer incidence was 70% in ERWT mice fed the control diet compared with 47% in ERWT mice fed low-dose genistein (300 mg/kg) and 32% on the high-dose genistein (750 mg/kg). Surprisingly, genistein only affected the well differentiated carcinoma (WDC) incidence but had no effect on poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC). No dietary effects have been observed in either of the ERKO animals. We observed a very strong genotypic influence on PDC incidence, a protective effect in ERαKO (only 5% developed PDC), compared with 19% in the ERWT, and an increase in the incidence of PDC in ERβKO mice to 41%. Interestingly, immunohistochemical analysis showed ERα expression changing from nonnuclear in WDC to nuclear in PDC, with little change in ERβ location or expression. In conclusion, genistein is able to inhibit WDC in the presence of both ERs, but the effect of estrogen signaling on PDC is dominant over any dietary treatment, suggesting that improved differential targeting of ERα vs. ERβ would result in prevention of advanced prostate cancer.
Estrogen (E2) is reported to regulate skeletal muscle mass and contractile function; whether E2 exerts its effects through estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) or -beta (ERbeta) is unclear. We determined the effect of ERalpha or ERbeta elimination on muscle mass and contractile function in multiple muscles of the lower limb, muscles with different locomotor tasks and proportions of fiber types I and II: soleus (Sol), plantaris (Plan), tibialis anterior (TA), and gastrocnemius (Gast) in mature female mice. To determine E2 elimination effects on muscle, we also used aromatase (Ar) knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. ERalpha and ArKO body weights were approximately 10 and 20% higher than WT. Although muscle mass tended to show a commensurate increase in both groups, only the TA was significantly larger in ERalpha (P<0.05). Ratios of muscle mass to body mass revealed significantly lower values for Gast and TA in ArKO mice (P<0.05). Tetanic tension (Po) per calculated anatomical cross-sectional area (aCSA) in ERalpha KO was lower in TA and Gast than in WT. Lower Po/aCSA in ERalpha KO Gast and TA was also supported histologically by significantly less Po/fiber areas (P<0.05). ArKO mice also had lower Po/aCSA in Gast and TA compared with WT. ERbeta KO and WT mice were comparable in all measures. Our results support the hypothesis that E2 effects on skeletal muscle are mediated in part via the ERalpha but that E2 effects may be mediated via more than one mechanism or receptor.
Background Despite the known benefits of medication therapy for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD), many patients do not adhere to prescribed medication regimens. Medication nonadherence is associated with poor health outcomes and higher health care cost. Objective The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the overall effectiveness of interventions designed to improve medication adherence (MA) among adults with CAD. Additionally, sample, study design, and intervention characteristics were explored as potential moderators to intervention effectiveness. Methods Comprehensive search strategies facilitated identification of two-group, treatment versus control design studies testing MA interventions among patients with CAD. Data were independently extracted by two trained research specialists. Standardized mean difference effect sizes were calculated for eligible primary studies, adjusted for bias, then synthesized under a random effects model. Homogeneity of variance was explored using a conventional heterogeneity statistic. Exploratory moderator analyses were conducted using meta-analytic analogues for ANOVA and regression for dichotomous and continuous moderators, respectively. Results Twenty-four primary studies were included in this meta-analysis. The overall effect size of MA interventions, calculated from 18,839 participants, was 0.229 (p<.001). The most effective interventions utilized nurses as interventionists, initiated interventions in the inpatient setting, and informed providers of patients' medication adherence behaviors. MA interventions tested among older patients were more effective than those among younger patients. Interventions were equally effective regardless of number of intervention sessions, targeting MA behavior alone or with other behaviors, and the use of written instructions only. Conclusions Interventions to increase medication adherence among patients with CAD were modestly effective. Nurses can be instrumental in improving MA among these patients. Future research is needed to investigate nurse-delivered MA interventions across varied clinical settings. Additionally, more research testing MA interventions among younger populations and more racially diverse groups is needed.
Prostate cancer possesses long latency periods and is responsive to dietary mediators, making it a target for phytochemoprevention. It has been reported that spinach consumption can reduce the incidence of prostate cancer leading our lab to look at structures of compounds present in spinach. We chose to study spinacetin and patuletin, two novel isoflavones found in spinach. We hypothesized that these spinach compounds would inhibit prostate cancer in vitro in the mouse prostate cancer cell line, TRAMP-C2, and that a spinach-containing diet would reduce cancer incidence in our TRAMP mouse model. Methods: We first isolated a crude spinacetin-containing fraction and patuletin-containing fraction from whole spinach leaves using HPLC column purification. A further purified extract was also isolated for each compound. Using these extracts we determined the effect of the spinach compounds on growth of TRAMP-C2 cells, and the effect that they have on the concentration of Gli1, an indicator of hedgehog signaling, as measured by RT-PCR and a Gli1-luciferase reporter assay. We also tested ground dried spinach at 0.2% and 2% incorporated into a casein-based diet fed to B6/FVB TRAMP mice, and then evaluated the development of prostate cancer histologically. Results: The extracts, each containing 0.1% spinacetin or patuletin, both inhibit prostate cancer cell growth in vitro, with the patuletin extract inhibiting approximately 30% and the spinacetin extract inhibiting nearly 50%. In addition, the purified compounds each inhibited Gli1 expression in both TRAMP-C2 (as measured by RTPCR) and Shh Light II cells (as measured by luciferase assay), with patuletin having an effect at 300nM and spinacetin at 1μM. The 2% spinach diet led to a 50% decrease in the incidence of well-differentiated carcinoma, but had no apparent effect on the more aggressive poorly-differentiated carcinoma. In conclusion, spinach and its compounds are capable of inhibiting prostate cancer growth and incidence in in vitro and in vivo mouse models. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5685.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.