(1) Enhanced ACh transmission in the vmPFC induces anxiety in challenging environments and enhances spontaneous working memory performance. (2) Blocking or activating postsynaptic M1 receptors in the vmPFC may truncate or exaggerate, respectively, afferent anxiety-relevant information. (3) IL pirenzepine and McN-A-343 exert long-term opposite effects on aversive learning during trial 1 in the elevated plus-maze.

Background Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)–associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) is an umbrella term for the behavioural, psychiatric, intellectual, academic, neuropsychological and psychosocial manifestations of TSC. Although TAND affects 90% of individuals with TSC during their lifetime, these manifestations are relatively under-assessed, under-treated and under-researched. We performed a comprehensive scoping review of all TAND research to date (a) to describe the existing TAND research landscape and (b) to identify knowledge gaps to guide future TAND research. Methods The study was conducted in accordance with stages outlined within the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework. Ten research questions relating to study characteristics, research design and research content of TAND levels and clusters were examined. Results Of the 2841 returned searches, 230 articles published between 1987 and 2020 were included (animal studies = 30, case studies = 47, cohort studies = 153), with more than half published since the term TAND was coined in 2012 (118/230; 51%). Cohort studies largely involved children and/or adolescents (63%) as opposed to older adults (16%). Studies were represented across 341 individual research sites from 45 countries, the majority from the USA (89/341; 26%) and the UK (50/341; 15%). Only 48 research sites (14%) were within low–middle income countries (LMICs). Animal studies and case studies were of relatively high/high quality, but cohort studies showed significant variability. Of the 153 cohort studies, only 16 (10%) included interventions. None of these were non-pharmacological, and only 13 employed remote methodologies (e.g. telephone interviews, online surveys). Of all TAND clusters, the autism spectrum disorder–like cluster was the most widely researched (138/230; 60%) and the scholastic cluster the least (53/200; 27%). Conclusions Despite the recent increase in TAND research, studies that represent participants across the lifespan, LMIC research sites and non-pharmacological interventions were identified as future priorities. The quality of cohort studies requires improvement, to which the use of standardised direct behavioural assessments may contribute. In human studies, the academic level in particular warrants further investigation. Remote technologies could help to address many of the TAND knowledge gaps identified.

Background: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex International (TSCi) is a consortium of organizations that supports individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) around the world. To improve care for TSC on a global level, TSCi identified the need to expand understanding about existing resources available in other countries, what individuals and caregivers value in TSC care, key gaps between needs and reality in each country, and ways these gaps can be addressed by advocacy organizations around the world. Methods: An iterative, mixed methods approach (the Improving Care project) was adopted to incorporate views from diverse members of TSCi. Through idea generation, a collection of qualitative openended responses and concept elicitation, we were able to build consensus where shared experiences and opinions were identified.Results: The research performed as a part of the Improving Care project revealed a significant gap between the guidelines and what is actually available to people with TSC worldwide. Three key priority areas of action to improve this gap were identified: (1) implementation of the guidelines; (2) access to TSC expertise, and (3) coordinated and integrated health care. Conclusions: There are significant opportunities for key stakeholders, including organizations, clinicians, and researchers to improve care for individuals with TSC on both local and global levels. Working across stakeholder groups and utilizing TSC organizations are essential to ensure that the advances in TSC research benefit people living with TSC around the world.

IntroductionTuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a multi-system genetic disorder with various TSC-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders (TAND) that significantly impact the mental health and wellbeing of individuals with TSC and their caregivers. TAND represents the number one concern to families worldwide, yet is highly under-identified and under-treated. The clinician-administered TAND-Checklist (Lifetime version, TAND-L) has improved identification of TAND in clinical settings. However, many individuals with TSC and their caregivers still have difficulty accessing suitable support for diagnosis and evidence-informed interventions. The TANDem study is a community-based participatory research project with a broad range of TSC stakeholders aimed at reducing the TAND identification and treatment gap.ObjectivesParticipatory research identified three priority next steps: 1) development and validation of a self-report, quantified version of the TAND Checklist (TAND-SQ) and building the TAND-SQ into a smartphone application, 2) generation of consensus clinical recommendations for the identification and treatment of TAND, to be incorporated as a TAND toolkit on the app, and 3) establishment of a global TAND consortium through networking, capacity-building and public engagement activities.MethodsTANDem is a four-year project, and includes 24 consortium members from 10 countries representing all World Health Organization regions. Collaborators represent five stakeholder groups (family representatives, technology experts, clinical experts, non-profit organisations and researchers). Here we outline the project study protocol in detail, describing the scientific rationale, the project aims and objectives, the methods involved in participant recruitment, multi-site and multi-phase data collection, data analysis, ethical considerations including informed consent, data protection, privacy and confidentiality considerations related to the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and the USA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The expected outcomes and potential impact on the TSC community, implementation and dissemination of results, as well as future scale-up and scale-out plans are also discussed.ConclusionsThe TANDem project has the potential to transform the global TSC community by empowering families living with TSC through an easily accessible digital solution to allow them to document their own TAND needs linked to an evidence-informed toolkit to enhance personalised healthcare, and by providing healthcare professionals with consensus clinical recommendations to prevent, identify and manage TAND manifestations.

No abstract

65 Background: Several organizations have created oncology pathways (pws) to support evidence-based medicine, and both standardize and improve the quality of care. Information is scarce; however, regarding the requirements for successful implementation of a pws program and monitoring of adherence. Methods: We assessed the efficacy of a quality assurance initiative called Practice Pathways Improvement (PPI) program to increase pws adherence to The US Oncology Network’s physician-developed Level I Pathways. We queried our electronic health record (EHR) iKnowMed to collect data before and after program initiation. Education was provided to address policies and procedures; leadership roles and responsibilities; integration of pws into the EHR and workflow; and the importance of correct data entry into the EHR. We then measured metrics including levels of assessable data (AD) (complete data, no missing or conflicting elements); On-Pathway adherence (ON-PW); and documented rationale for exceptions (EX) of Off-Pathway treatments. Metric performance reports were distributed monthly. Results: Since 2010, 10 practices of varying size (6-342 medical oncologists) and sites (2-47) voluntarily participated. Program duration ranged from 6-12 months (mos). There were 42,266 regimens evaluated during the program, covering 19 disease pws. Baseline averages, results at program end, and current averages (avg) for AD, ON-PW, and EX are shown in the Table. As of June 2012, average follow up was 19 mos (range 13-25). A normal approximation shows significance of p < 0.001. Conclusions: Implementation of a quality assurance initiative containing operational, leadership, and workflow elements along with continued education is important for successful pws adherence. Tailored program components are necessary to meet individual practice needs. Establishing a foundation for a pws process is important to maintain performance over time. As the reimbursement landscape in oncology evolves, the ability to demonstrate quality of care is essential. [Table: see text]

No abstract