The 'evolution of increased competitive ability' (EICA) hypothesis is an extension of optimal defense theory and predicts that reduced pressure from insect herbivores in the introduced range results in evolution of reduced defenses in invading plant populations, allowing greater allocation of resources to competitive traits such as growth rate and reproduction. The EICA hypothesis considered levels of defensive chemistry to be fixed within a particular genotype. In this paper, we propose that if herbivory is reduced in the introduced range, but chemical defenses are inducible in response to herbivory, evolution of reduced defenses and any associated increase competitive ability should not occur. Rather, mean induced and constitutive levels of induced defenses should be similar in introduced and native ranges, but the variance about mean induced levels should be greater in the introduced range. This is predicted because induced levels will occur less frequently in the introduced range where herbivory is reduced, thereby insulating these levels from the stabilizing selection expected in the native range where induced levels occur more frequently. We conducted a preliminary study to examine this by comparing constitutive and induced concentrations of total pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) from native (European) and introduced (western North America) populations of Cynoglossum officinale L. The mean constitutive and induced concentrations of PAs did not differ between continents, but the variability of the induced concentrations was significantly greater for plants from the introduced range. Although our study with C. officinale is provisional due to a small sample size, it supports our predictions for evolution of inducible defenses in introduced ranges where herbivore pressure is reduced. Most chemical defenses in plants have been found to be inducible, so similar patterns may occur widely. If so, this weakens the generality of EICA's predictions concerning chemical defenses. The effects of inducible defenses should be considered in cross-continent comparisons of other invasive plant species.
Non-target effects of approved biological control agents have raised questions about the safety of biological control of weeds and resulted in an increased emphasis on monitoring and reporting of non-target effects as part of post-release assessments. This is particularly important in the case of the root-mining weevil Mogulones cruciger (Herbst), which was approved in Canada to control houndstongue, Cynoglossum officinale L., but not in the United States because of concerns over its environmental safety. To address these concerns and the potential for non-target effects, we monitored co-occurring confamilial Boraginaceae species at six M. cruciger release sites in Alberta and British Columbia over two years. All four co-occurring species were attacked by the weevil to varying degrees although attack was inconsistent between years and sites, and non-targets were mostly attacked to a lesser degree than houndstongue. There was a positive relationship between the probability of non-target attack and houndstongue attack rate by M. cruciger indicating potential spillovers and early evidence suggests non-target attack may be transitory. The comparison between the pre- and post-release evaluations and preliminary plant volatile, electroantennogram, and host-choice behaviour data suggest that chemical ecology may provide an important tool in understanding an insect's host-choice selection in pre-release host-specificity assessments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.