Despite international efforts, stigma is still a significant issue for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). This paper explores the stigma encountered in health interactions, focusing on strategies PLWHA use to manage and reduce it. It is hoped that our findings will improve future interactions by contributing towards a more understanding practitioner-patient relationship. The data have been drawn from a small qualitative study conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand. Fourteen participants took part in semi-structured face-to-face interviews in 2013 and 11 of these participants were then interviewed again in 2014. Codes and themes were developed through inductive thematic analysis of the interview transcripts. Our findings identified that whilst the majority of participants had positive experiences, nearly all had faced stigma during their health interactions. Most of these encounters were due to healthcare workers holding exaggerated fears of transmission or not maintaining confidentiality and privacy. The main way that participants managed this stigma was through seeking control in their interactions. This overarching strategy could be further divided into three key themes: selective disclosure of their HIV status, self-advocacy and developing their HIV knowledge. We discuss these findings in the context of the current literature, comparing our results to strategies that have been previously identified in social settings.

Introduction Sexual health is an intrinsic element of overall health; however, opportunities to enhance medical student comfort and knowledge about sexual health vary substantially and receive limited curricular time. Sex, Bugs, and Rock ’n’ Roll is a novel service-learning initiative designed to enhance undergraduate medical student knowledge and comfort with sexual health. A total of 80 fifth-year undergraduate medical students researched, designed, and delivered a short sexual health promotion initiative for a population that experiences inequity. Methods This initiative employed active learning tasks including performing a literature review, participating in team learning, facilitating small-group sessions, and providing peer feedback. Ongoing formative feedback from the program leaders, tutors, and members of the target audience contributed to student development. A summative assessment rubric was used by program leaders to evaluate student performance at the end of the module. Anonymized pre- and posttest knowledge questions and module evaluations were used to evaluate the module. Results All 80 (100%) students completed randomized pre- and posttest knowledge questions and module evaluations. Student knowledge scores about sexuality and sexual health improved by 17% between pre- and posttest. All students reported increased comfort with and understanding of the clinical relevance of sexual health in the module evaluations. Discussion Sex, Bugs, and Rock ’n’ Roll is a promising initiative for improving medical student knowledge and comfort with sexual health. This module also offers a novel way for students to experience sexual health, public health, and social accountability in an active and engaging fashion.

Background: There is no accepted best practice for optimizing tertiary student knowledge, perceptions, and skills to care for sexual and gender diverse groups. The objective of this research was to synthesize the relevant literature regarding effective curricular initiatives designed to enhance tertiary level student knowledge, perceptions, and skills to care for sexual and gender diverse populations.Methods: A modified Critical Interpretive Synthesis using a systematic search strategy was conducted in 2015. This method was chosen to synthesize the relevant qualitative and quantitative literature as it allows for the depth and breadth of information to be captured and new constructs to be illuminated. Databases searched include AMED, CINAHL EBM Reviews, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Nursing Database, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. Results: Thirty-one articles were included in this review. Curricular initiatives ranging from discrete to multimodal approaches have been implemented. Successful initiatives included discrete sessions with time for processing, and multi-modal strategies. Multi-modal approaches that encouraged awareness of one’s lens and privilege in conjunction with facilitated communication seemed the most effective.Conclusions: The literature is limited to the evaluation of explicit curricula. The wider cultural competence literature offers further insight by highlighting the importance of broad and embedded forces including social influences, the institutional climate, and the implicit, or hidden, curriculum. A combined interpretation of the complementary cultural competence and sexual and gender diversity literature provides a novel understanding of the optimal content and context for the delivery of a successful curricular initiative.

Background Global health education partnerships should be collaborative and reciprocal to ensure mutual benefit. Utilisation of digital technologies can overcome geographic boundaries and facilitate collaborative global health learning. Global Health Classroom (GHCR) is a collaborative global health learning model involving medical students from different countries learning about each other’s health systems, cultures, and determinants of health via videoconference. Principles of reciprocity and interinstitutional partnership informed the development of the GHCR. This study explores learning outcomes and experiences in the GHCR between students from New Zealand and Samoa. Methods This study used a mixed methods approach employing post-GHCR questionnaires and semi-structured face-to-face interviews to explore self-reported learning and experiences among medical students in the GHCR. The GHCR collaboration studied was between the medical schools at the University of Otago, New Zealand and the National University of Samoa, Samoa. Results Questionnaire response rate was 85% (74/87). Nineteen interviews were conducted among New Zealand and Samoan students. Students reported acquiring the intended learning outcomes relating to patient care, health systems, culture, and determinants of health with regards to their partner country. Interview data was indicative of attitudinal changes in relation to cultural humility and curiosity. Some reported a vision for progress regarding their own health system. Students in the GHCR reported that learning with their international peers in the virtual classroom made learning about global health more real and tangible. The benefits to students from both countries indicated reciprocity. Conclusions This study demonstrates GHCR to be a promising model for collaborative and reciprocal global health learning using a student-led format and employing digital technology to create a virtual classroom. The self-reported learning outcomes align favourably with those recommended in the literature. In view of our positive findings, we present GHCR as an adaptable model for equitable, collaborative global health learning between students in internationally partnered institutions.

Introduction: Assessment of healthcare professionals should be authentic to clinical practice. As clinicians regularly use resources in practice, similar resources should be available to those sitting assessment. There is limited information on the impacts of open-book (resource) assessments on standard setting for use in high-stakes assessments. This research aims to explore the effects on standard setting and student perceptions when open vs closed resources are available in high-stakes assessment of medical students. Methods: Students sat multiple-choice question (MCQ) examinations under both closed-and open-resource conditions in a randomised crossover design. A standard setting panel set pass-marks for both closed-and open-resource conditions of delivery, and we compared these pass-marks with each other and with actual performance. Students responded to a survey on perceptions of open-resource assessments.Results: The pass-mark was set higher when panellists considered open-resource conditions compared to closed conditions (59% vs 47%), but actual student performance showed no difference in scores between the two conditions. The net effect was that the pass rate was higher for closed than open-resource conditions (71% vs 34%). Open-resource conditions increased the time to complete the questions. The students perceived that open resource was more authentic but was more timeconsuming and would require different preparation. Regarding the acceptability of including open resources in high-stakes assessment, the responses of students were mixed. Discussion: Pass standards based solely on judgements by panellists experienced in closed-resource conditions might not be applicable under open conditions. Questions vary in how much time accessing resources may take and the degree of assistance in selecting the correct answer. A programme of assessment could be constructed to include both closed-and open-resource condition assessments depending on the questions' content and format. Open-resource conditions may promote assessment preparation that focuses more on seeking and evaluating resources rather than learning facts.

Background Global health education partnerships should be collaborative and reciprocal to ensure mutual benefit. Utilisation of digital technologies can overcome geographic boundaries and facilitate collaborative global health learning. Global Health Classroom (GHCR) is a collaborative global health learning model involving medical students from different countries learning about each other’s health systems, cultures, and determinants of health via videoconference. Principles of reciprocity and inter-institutional partnership informed the development of GHCR. This study explores learning outcomes and experiences in GHCR between students from New Zealand and Samoa. Methods The study used a mixed methods approach employing post-GHCR questionnaires and semi-structured face-to-face interviews to explore self-reported learning and experiences among medical students in GHCR. The GHCR collaboration studied was between the medical schools at the University of Otago, New Zealand and the National University of Samoa, Samoa.ResultsQuestionnaire response rate was 85% (74/87). Nineteen interviews were conducted among New Zealand and Samoan students. Students reported acquiring the intended learning outcomes relating to patient care, health systems, culture, and determinants of health with regards to their partner country. There was evidence of attitudinal changes including cultural curiosity and humility. Some reported a vision for progress regarding their own health system. Students reported that interacting with their international peers in the virtual classroom made learning about global health real and tangible. Mutual benefit to students from both countries indicated reciprocity.Conclusions The study demonstrates GHCR to be a promising model for collaborative and reciprocal global health learning using a student-led format and employing digital technology to create a virtual classroom. The self-reported learning outcomes align favourably with those recommended in the literature. In view of our positive findings, we present GHCR as an adaptable model for equitable, collaborative global health learning between students in internationally partnered institutions.

No abstract

No abstract