The global lockdown to mitigate COVID-19 pandemic health risks has altered human interactions with nature. Here, we report immediate impacts of changes in human activities on wildlife and environmental threats during the early lockdown months of 2020, based on 877 qualitative reports and 332 quantitative assessments from different studies. Hundreds of reports of unusual species observations from around the world suggest that animals quickly responded to the reductions in human presence. However, negative effects of lockdown on conservation also emerged, as confinement resulted in some park officials being unable to perform conservation, restoration and enforcement tasks, resulting in local increases in illegal activities such as hunting. Overall, there is a complex mixture of positive and negative effects of the pandemic lockdown on nature, all of which have the potential to lead to cascading responses which in turn impact wildlife and nature conservation. While the net effect of the lockdown will need to be assessed over years as data becomes available and persistent effects emerge, immediate responses were detected across the world. Thus, initial qualitative and quantitative data arising from this serendipitous global quasi-experimental perturbation highlights the dual role that humans play in threatening and protecting species and ecosystems. Pathways to favorably tilt this delicate balance include reducing impacts and increasing conservation effectiveness.

In the face of modern challenges, analyzing sea turtle nesting trends is critical to better understand impacts to these vulnerable species. The introduction of hard-armoring structures (e.g., seawalls, rock revetments) on sea turtle nesting beaches poses a threat to nesting leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), loggerhead (Caretta caretta), and green (Chelonia mydas) sea turtles due to habitat loss and turtle interactions with the physical structure. Despite much of Florida’s coastline being protected by some form of hard-armoring technology, research on the impacts of these structures to sea turtles is limited to loggerheads. Our objectives were to (1) examine nest density, nesting success, washout rates, and hatching and emergence success at hard-armoring sites in comparison to a control area and (2) characterize impacts of obstructions encountered by sea turtles nesting in northern Palm Beach County, Florida. Our results indicate that the hard-armoring site showed significantly lower nest density for green turtles and nesting success for loggerheads and green turtles in comparison to a control area. Additionally, nesting success for loggerheads and green turtles that encountered hard-armoring structures was significantly lower in comparison to those that encountered no obstructions or other obstructions (e.g., beach furniture, walkovers, escarpments, etc.). These results suggest that hard-armoring structures negatively impact sea turtle nesting behavior, which could result in loss of energy or other physiological derangements. Green turtles showed the most significant differences between the two sites, likely a result of their typical nest site selection favoring the upper portions of the beach, crawling further distances from the high-water line than loggerheads or leatherbacks. Before additional hard-armoring structures are permitted and installed, governing agencies should first consider more natural methods of protecting shorelines (e.g., dune restoration).

No abstract