In February 2020, burn prevention experts from a variety of professional backgrounds gathered for a national Burn Prevention Summit. Through lively discussion and debate, this group came to a consensus on several core burn prevention concepts in order to create a framework for burn prevention program planning. The resulting document includes components of a successful program, a five-step process for program planning, best practices in messaging, and general advice from the summit attendees. This framework is designed for both novice professionals who are new to burn prevention programming development and experienced professionals who would like to strengthen existing programming.
Introduction Burn camps provide a unique environment and activities for children that have experienced a burn-injury. Positive outcomes from attending burn camp include increased self-esteem, decreased feelings of isolation and a greater sense of self-confidence. In a 3-year retrospective review of camper evaluations from one of the largest and longest running week-long burn camps in the nation for ages 5–17, we aimed to assess if a child’s gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity affected the impact that burn camp had on a child. Methods A 3-year retrospective review of a Burn Camp’s camper evaluation forms was conducted for campers that attended burn camp between 2017–2019. Camp rosters were reviewed to determine the camper gender, age, TBSA and ethnicity. Camper self-evaluation forms completed at the end of each camp session were reviewed to record camper responses to questions regarding their opinions on the impact camp had on them as well as how camp will impact their lives once they return home. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were described as median and range. To check the relationship between two categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. To compare the continuous variable among groups, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used. Statistical significance was declared based on a p value< 0.5. Results Within 2017–2019, there were 413 camper records. Participants’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 208 males (50.3%) and 205 females (49.6%). The median age of campers were 11.86, 12.44 and 12.45 for 2017–2019, with the range from 5.16 years to 17.96 years. The median TBSA were 20, 20 and 18 for 2017–2019, with the range from 0.08 to 90. Collectively there were 47.7% Hispanic (n= 197); 24.2% Whites (n=100); 13.1% Black (n= 54); 4.6% Asian (n=19) and 7.7% Other (n=32). There were 395 camper self-evaluation forms submitted. Results of three questions there we were interested in are summarized collectively in Table 2. 57% of campers responded, “Yes, Definitely” to the question “After going to this event, will you feel more comfortable being around your classmates or friends?” 54% responded, “ Yes, Definitely” to the question “Do you feel more confidents in sharing your burn story with others when returning home?” and 51% responded “Yes, Definitely” to “Did you learn anything that will help you when you return home?” Conclusions In analyzing the camper responses, there was no statistically significant difference in responses comparing gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity.
Introduction Burn camps provide a safe haven for child burn survivors to socialize and participate in recreational activities away from the unwanted stares from the public. But when a worldwide pandemic forced one of the world’s largest burn camps to forgo an in-person camp and pivot to a virtual camp, would the virtual burn camp prove as effective as an in-person burn camp? Methods In a 4-year retrospective review of camper evaluations within 2017–2020, we aimed to assess if the campers’ evaluation responses of virtual camp were consistent with their responses from past in-person camp evaluations. Camper self-evaluation forms were reviewed to record camper responses to questions regarding their opinions on camp. Camp rosters were reviewed to determine which campers attended virtual Burn Camp in 2020 as well as in-person Burn Camp among the years 2017–2019, and matched sample comparisons were reviewed (2020 vs. 2017; 2020 vs. 2018 and 2020 vs. 2019). Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were described as median and range. To assess if the responses to each question were consistent between 2020 vs. 2017, 2018 and 2019, McNemar’s test was used. Statistical significance was declared based on a p value< 0.05. Results Within 2017–2020, there were 444 camper evaluations submitted. In 2020, there were 137 registered campers. Sample size of this study was small due to a low response rate to evaluation form requests from virtual Burn Camp participants. There were 31 individual completed evaluations forms (23% response rate). Among 31 campers, 20, 22 and 20 campers attended 2017, 2018, and 2019 in-person Burn Camp, respectively. Participants’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Comparisons between 2020 vs. 2017, 2018 and 2019, in general, the campers’ responses were consistent. However, for Question #8 (Did you learn anything new from the other burn survivors at this event?) in 2020, more people (n=8) answered Not/A little while they answered Yes/Mostly in 2019 (p=0.046). Participants’ responses to Question#8 are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Conclusions Virtual Burn Camp was generally as effective as in-person Burn Camp in almost all areas of assessment, except for the ability for burn-injured children to learn from other burn-injured children. The virtual Burn Camp model provided some interaction between counselors and campers, but did not allow for much interaction between campers, resulting in a greater response of “A Little” or “Not at All” to the question “Did you learn anything new from the other burn survivors at this event?”
Introduction Burn camps provide a unique environment and activities for children that have experienced a burn-injury. Positive outcomes from attending burn camp include increased self-esteem, decreased feelings of isolation and a greater sense of self-confidence. In a 3-year retrospective review of camper evaluations from one of the largest and longest running week-long burn camps in the nation for ages 5–17, we aimed to assess if a child’s gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity affected the impact that burn camp had on a child. Methods A 3-year retrospective review of a Burn Camp’s camper evaluation forms was conducted for campers that attended burn camp between 2017–2019. Camp rosters were reviewed to determine the camper gender, age, TBSA and ethnicity. Camper self-evaluation forms completed at the end of each camp session were reviewed to record camper responses to questions regarding their opinions on the impact camp had on them as well as how camp will impact their lives once they return home. Categorical variables were summarized as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables were describes as median and range. To check the relationship between two categorical variables, Chi-square test was used. To compare the continuous variable among groups, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA was used. Statistical significance was declared based on a p value< 0.5. Results Within 2017–2019, there were 413 camper records. Participants’ demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. There were 208 males (50.3%) and 205 females (49.6%). The median age of campers were 11.86, 12.44 and 12.45 for 2017–2019, with the range from 5.16 years to 17.96 years. The median TBSA were 20, 20 and 18 for 2017–2019, with the range from 0.08 to 90. Collectively there were 47.7% Hispanic (n= 197); 24.2% Whites (n=100); 13.1% Black (n= 54); 4.6% Asian (n=19) and 7.7% Other (n=32). There were 395 camper self-evaluation forms submitted. Results of three questions there we were interested in are summarized collectively in Table 2. 57% of campers responded, “Yes, Definitely” to the question “After going to this event, will you feel more comfortable being around your classmates or friends?” 54% responded, “ Yes, Definitely” to the question “Do you feel more confident in sharing your burn story with others when returning home?” and 51% responded “Yes, Definitely” to “Did you learn anything that will help you when you return home?” Conclusions In analyzing the camper responses, there was no statistically significant difference in responses comparing gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity. Applicability of Research to Practice Research shows that burn camps have a positive effect on burn survivors including improving self-esteem, self-confidence and social skills. This study shows that burn camp is beneficial to burn survivors of varying gender, age, TBSA or ethnicity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.