BACKGROUND: The severe forms of thalassemia are the most common inherited anemias managed with regular blood transfusion therapy. Transfusion policies and complications are critical to quality of life and survival, but there is a lack of standardized care. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:A survey of 58 items was completed in 2016 by 11 centers in California, Washington, Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona providing long-term care for thalassemia. The questionnaire addressed demographic information, transfusion practices and complications, and educational needs. RESULTS:The centers followed 717 patients with β-thalassemia (314, 43.8%) or α-thalassemia (394, 55%). One-third (34.7%) of patients were transfusiondependent. Indications and goals of transfusion therapy differed between centers. Prestorage leukoreduction was universal, while routine irradiation of units was limited to one site. Red blood cell antigen phenotype was determined before the first transfusion and patients received Rh/Kell-matched units. However, more than half of the transfused patients had received blood at multiple hospitals within or outside the United States. Alloantibodies were seen in 16.9% of transfused group, but management of such patients was variable. Unusual or emerging transfusion-transmitted pathogens were not observed. Multiple educational needs were recognized, with iron overload as the biggest challenge; the approach to iron chelation varied within the group.CONCLUSION: This study identified many patients not included in earlier surveys limited to major national centers, suggesting that the thalassemia population in the United States is vastly underestimated. Lack of evidence-based guidelines is a barrier to optimal care, which should be addressed through regional consortia of thalassemia centers.ABBREVIATIONS: LIC = liver iron concentration; NTD = non-transfusion dependent. From the Human subjects protectionCompletion of the surveys was acknowledged as a quality improvement activity exempt from the need for approval by institutional review boards. Each center provided only summary data and did not share patient-level information or identifiers. Statistical analysisResponses from all centers were summarized as tables and the proportion of individual responses were calculated.
Objective To explore the association between red blood cell transfusion and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in a neonatal intensive care unit with liberal transfusion practices. Study design A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all infants weighing <1500 g who received at least 1 packed red blood cell transfusion between January 2008 and June 2013 in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. The primary outcome was NEC, defined as Bell stage II or greater. The temporal association of NEC and transfusion was assessed using multivariate Poisson regression. Results The study sample included 414 very low birth weight infants who received 2889 consecutive red blood cell transfusions. Twenty-four infants (5.8%) developed NEC. Four cases of NEC occurred within 48 hours of a previous transfusion event. Using multivariate Poisson regression, we did not find evidence of a temporal association between NEC and transfusion (P = .32). Conclusion There was no association between NEC and red blood cell transfusion. Our results differ from pre vious studies and suggest that the association between NEC and transfusion may be contextual.
Contrary to what has been previously reported in the era of prestorage leukoreduction, HyTRs at our institution showed consistent patterns in patients at risk. Patients scheduled to undergo major surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass may benefit from earlier preoperative cessation of ACEIs or temporarily switching to an alternative drug class.
BACKGROUND: Infants undergoing cardiac surgery are at risk for bleeding and massive transfusion due to an immature coagulation system, complex surgeries, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) effects. Hemodilution from CPB promotes an acquired hypofibrinogenemia that results in impaired fibrin formation, inadequate clot formation, and increased bleeding. In North America, the current standard of care to supplement fibrinogen is cryoprecipitate. An alternative option is the off-label use of fibrinogen concentrate (FC; RiaSTAP; CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany), a purified fibrinogen. Because perioperative allogenic transfusions are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, we sought to determine whether FC would be an acceptable alternative to cryoprecipitate in a post-CPB transfusion algorithm in infants undergoing open-heart surgery. METHODS: We randomized 60 infants (<12 months) undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery with CPB at 2 tertiary care children’s hospitals to receive either cryoprecipitate or FC in a post-CPB transfusion algorithm. Infants underwent a stratified randomization based on institution and surgical complexity. The primary outcome was the difference in number of intraoperative allogenic blood product transfusions. Secondary outcomes included 24-hour chest tube output (CTO), mechanical ventilation time, adverse events (AEs), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, postoperative thrombosis, and death within 30 days of surgery. The primary analysis followed the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle and was performed using linear regression adjusted for institution and complexity of surgery. A per-protocol (PP) analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Between June 2016 and January 2018, we enrolled 60 patients with complete data available for 25 patients who received cryoprecipitate and 29 patients who received FC. Patients in the cryoprecipitate group (median age: 4 months [2–6 months]) received 5.5 (4.0–7.0) allogeneic blood units in the ITT analysis and 6.0 units (5.0–7.0 units) in the PP analysis. Patients in the FC group (median age: 4 months [2–5]) received 4 units (3.0–5.0 units) in the ITT analysis and 4.0 units (3.0–5.0 units) in the PP analysis. In the adjusted ITT analysis, the FC group received 1.79 units (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64–2.93; P = .003) less than the cryoprecipitate group. In the adjusted PP analysis, the FC group received 2.67 units (95% CI, 1.75–3.59; P < .001) less than the cryoprecipitate group. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes or AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that FC may be considered as an alternative to cryoprecipitate for the treatment of hypofibrinogenemia in infants with bleeding after CPB. Although we found no significant differences between secondary outcomes or AEs, further studies are needed to assess safety.
Based on our experience and on the findings of our retrospective analysis, patients presenting with either antepartum radiological evidence or clinical suspicion of morbidly adherent placenta will benefit from a standardized protocol for clinical management, including transfusion medicine support. We found that massive hemorrhage is predictable when abnormal placentation is identified predelivery and that blood product support is substantial regardless of the degree of placental invasiveness. The protocol at our institution provides immediate access to sufficient volumes and types of blood products at delivery for patients at highest risk for life-threatening obstetric hemorrhage. Therefore, for patients with a diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta scheduled for planned cesarean delivery with possible hysterectomy, a programmatic checklist that mobilizes a multidisciplinary team, including proactive transfusion medicine support, represents best practices.
ABO incompatibility (ABOi), the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN), is nearly always mild and treatable with phototherapy. Reports of ABOi HDN requiring neonatal exchange transfusion are extremely rare since the inception of modern guidelines. Here, a case of ABOi HDN clearly met criteria for exchange transfusion. An O-positive African American mother delivered a B-positive neonate that quickly developed hyperbilirubinemia. The neonatal DAT was positive from anti-B and anti-A,B, and maternal IgG titer was 1024. Double volume exchange transfusion resulted in a favorable outcome. Given early discharge of newborns, further understanding of factors predicting severe disease is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.