Clostridium difficile infection is most often induced by antibiotic treatment. Recently, morbidity and mortality resulting especially from C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 have increased significantly. In addition, more severe disease has been associated with C. difficile PCR ribotype 078 strains. Thus, reliable typing methods for epidemic control are needed. In the present study, we compared an automated repetitive extragenic palindromic sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) method (DiversiLab; Bacterial Barcodes, Inc., Athens, GA, USA) to PCR ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typing using 205 isolates of C. difficile (including 24 previously characterized isolates). Among the 181 clinical isolates, a total of 31 different PCR ribotypes, 38 different PFGE types and subtypes and 28 different rep-PCR types were found. Six major rep-PCR groups (DL1-DL6) harboured 86% of the clinical isolates. All isolates belonging to PCR ribotypes 027 and 001 clustered in their own rep-PCR groups, enabling us to screen out the hypervirulent ribotype 027 strain. Within the PCR ribotype 001, four subgroups were found using rep-PCR. Overall, in 75% (135/181) of the isolates, the classification attributed following rep-PCR and PCR ribotyping was comparable. In conclusion, the automated rep-PCR-based typing method represents an option for first-line molecular typing in local clinical microbiology laboratories. The method was easy to use as well as rapid, requiring less hands-on time than PCR ribotyping or PFGE typing. The conventional PCR ribotyping or PFGE, however, are needed for confirmatory molecular epidemiology. In addition, more epidemiology-oriented studies are needed to examine the discriminatory power of automated rep-PCR with isolates collected from a larger geographical area and during a longer period of time.
Four different extended-spectrum β -lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria from a pediatric surgery ward were studied. The presence of TEM-, SHV-, and CTX-M-type β -lactamases was analyzed and the relatedness of the isolates studied with a repetitive PCR system (DiversiLab) and pulsed-fi eld gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Molecular analysis showed that a clonal dissemination of CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae had occurred.
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) causes diarrhea, often with severe complications. Rapid and discriminatory typing of EHEC using advanced molecular methods is needed for determination of the genetic relatedness of clones responsible for foodborne outbreaks and for finding out the transmission sources of the outbreaks. This study evaluated the potential of DiversiLab, a semiautomated repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction method for the genotyping of EHEC strains. A set of 52 EHEC strains belonging to 15 O:H serotypes was clustered into 10 DiversiLab groups. All of the O157 strains and one O55 strain were classified into the same group based on a 90% similarity threshold. The other serotypes were classified to their own DiversiLab group, with the exception of one R:H(-) strain that was grouped with O5:H(-) strains. In addition, O26 and O111 strains were grouped together but ultimately subdivided according to their O-serotypes based on a 95% similarity threshold. The O104 strain, which was associated with a major outbreak of hemolytic uremic syndrome in Germany in May 2011, was also classified independently. The DiversiLab performed well in identifying isolates, but the discriminatory power of the repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction method was lower than that of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Analysis of 15 enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) strains revealed that some EPEC strains clustered together with EHEC strains. Therefore, the DiversiLab system cannot be used to discriminate between these pathogroups. In conclusion, DiversiLab is a rapid and easy system for the primary exclusion of unrelated EHEC strains based on their serotypes, but more discriminatory methods, such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, are needed for accurate typing of the EHEC strains.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.