Case summary Minimally invasive surgery is an increasingly popular alternative to open surgery in veterinary medicine. Compared with traditional surgical approaches, laparoscopic pancreatectomy provides a less invasive approach and has several potential benefits, including improved visualization, reduced infection rate and decreased postoperative pain. Laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy has been described in humans, dogs and pigs but not cats. Pancreatectomy with or without chemotherapy is a treatment option for exocrine pancreatic carcinoma, a rare but malignant cancer in cats. We report the case of a 16-year-old male neutered domestic longhair cat diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic carcinoma that was treated with laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy, carboplatin and toceranib phosphate. A three-port technique using a 5 mm 0º telescope and bipolar vessel sealing device was performed to remove the entire left limb of the pancreas. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged the following day. Forty days postoperatively, the patient received its first of five doses of carboplatin, which were given every 4–5 weeks over a period of 4 months. A maintenance protocol of toceranib phosphate was started after completion of carboplatin treatment. At the time of this article being submitted, the patient had survived for more than 221 days. Relevance and novel information This is the first report of a laparoscopic partial pancreatectomy performed on a feline patient for pancreatic carcinoma.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors contributing to owner decision-making, satisfaction, and perception of quality of life (QOL) with treatment of dogs with nontraumatic hemoabdomen (NTH). ANIMALS 132 client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES An electronic survey was administered to owners of 436 dogs that presented emergently with NTH to a single institution between January 2015 and May 2022. Following survey response, retrospective data collection was performed. RESULTS Owners reported QOL as the most important factor influencing their decision-making (92%), followed by risk of cancer (57%) or time remaining with their pet (56%). QOL scores were significantly higher with surgery versus those with palliative care (P = .007). Median survival time (MST) was 213 days with surgery and 39 days with palliative care (P = .049). Survival benefit of surgery was lost when considering only dogs with malignant histopathology (MST, 81 days; P = .305). Owners were more likely to be satisfied when they chose surgery over either euthanasia or palliative care (P = .039). Thirty-four owners (26%) second-guessed or were unsure of their decision. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Surgery resulted in the longest MST with greater perceived QOL and owner satisfaction compared with both palliative care and euthanasia and should therefore be considered highly. The importance of malignancy and survival time on owners’ decisions, along with the negative impact of metastasis on survival, underscores the importance of timely preoperative staging. The rate of second-guessing highlights the need for standardization of NTH discussions including treatment options and potential outcomes in order to effectively and efficiently guide treatment of patients with this common presentation.
ObjectiveTo determine any association between gender and likelihood of first attempt match and overall time to match into an American College of Veterinary Surgery (ACVS)‐registered small animal surgical residency program (SASRP).Study designOnline survey.Sample populationA total of 100 (77 female, 23 male) ACVS small animal surgery residents or diplomates participating in a SASRP during the past 5 years.MethodsAn online survey was sent to eligible individuals. Respondents anonymously provided information related to demographics, postgraduate internships, and qualifications at the time of each surgical residency application. First attempt and overall match success were evaluated by gender through univariable analysis and then via a multivariable model.ResultsMen were 2.89 times more likely to match directly into a SASRP following a rotating internship than women (p = .041), and women completed more total internships than men prior to successful match into a SASRP (p = .030); however, men were found to have more publications at the time of first residency application (p < .001) or successful match (p = .018). Multivariable analysis revealed no association between gender on overall match success or first attempt match rate when considering all other qualifications.ConclusionNo evidence for gender bias was found during the Veterinary Internship and Residency Matching Program (VIRMP) SASRP applicant selection process; however, gender specific patterns in research qualifications were identified.ImpactGender‐blinded assessment is not considered necessary for the VIRMP small animal surgical resident selection process. Efforts should be made to educate applicants about the impact of research on the residency selection process and encourage research engagement of female students and graduates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.