The eating disorders anorexia and bulimia nervosa have traditionally been regarded as entirely separate from obesity. Eating disorders have been regarded as Western culture-bound syndromes, arising in societies with excessive emphasis on weight, shape and appearance, and best treated by psychological therapies, in particular cognitive behavioural therapy or familybased interventions. In contrast, obesity has been considered a medical illness with metabolic and genetic origins, and thought to be best treated by mainstream medicine, involving dietary, drug or surgical treatment. We believe that this polarisation is fundamentally flawed, and research and treatment of both types of disorder would be better served by greater appreciation of the psychosocial components of obesity and the biological and genetic components of eating disorders. There are similarities in phenotype (such as excessive attempts at weight control, binge eating behaviours) and in risk factors (such as low self-esteem, external locus of control, childhood abuse and neglect, dieting, media exposure, body image dissatisfaction, weight-related teasing and shared susceptibility genes). One example of shared genetic risk is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BNDF) gene, in which the valine allele of the Va166Met amino acid polymorphism predisposes to obesity, whereas the methionine allele predisposes to eating disorders. Thus the evidence suggests that these disorders will have both shared and distinct susceptibility factors; some will predispose to both types of disorder, some will push in opposite directions, and some will separate them.

These data offer support for the status of life events (with a negative valence) as a risk factor for psychological problems in adults with ID. To establish life events as a causal risk factor, research is needed to examine the mechanisms via which life events have their impact on psychological well-being.

Background: Patient and graft survival 20-years after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) are excellent. In children, attainment of normal growth, education and social adaptation to be an independent adult are equally important. This is particularly relevant for children who receive liver transplant at a young age, where infantile-onset liver disease, surgery and immunosuppression can adversely affect growth and neurodevelopment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term physical and psychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal graft function. We coin the term 'meaningful survival'. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of pLT recipients who received transplants between 1985 and 2004. A 20-year evaluation of physical health (growth, renal function), mental wellbeing and social outcomes (substance abuse, adherence, education, employment) was performed. All patients included were considered to have normal graft function. Findings: Eighty-four patients met study criteria. Median age at transplantation was 1.3 years (IQR 0¢7À3¢3 years), with median duration of follow-up of 20.2 years (18¢0À23¢5). At median of 20-years, 19 patients (23%) had chronic renal dysfunction and 3 patients (4%) had a BMI of >30 (mean 20¢4). Evaluation of longterm psychosocial outcomes demonstrated 22 patients (26%) with mental health disorders. Substance abuse was lower than national average. 62 patients (74%) were in education, employment or training. Overall, only 26% of our cohort achieved a composite outcome of 'meaningful survival'. Interpretation: This is the largest reported long-term study of biopsychosocial outcomes of pLT recipients with normal liver biochemistry, with follow-up upon completion of physical growth and senior school education. Importantly, despite normal liver function, many patients did not demonstrate 'meaningful survival'. We must refocus our efforts towards better understanding the long-term outcomes of children. A 'meaningful survival' rather than mere survival should be our goal.

Increased awareness of this may help identify those particularly at risk for developing an early-onset of eating pathology.

In this study we have demonstrated that executive functioning in BPD is improved after treatment with quetiapine. Neurocognitive measures of executive functioning should be considered as valuable outcomes in the study of treatment efficacy in BPD.