Context.-Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that has estrogen-agonistic effects on bone and estrogen-antagonistic effects on breast and uterus. Objective.-To identify the effects of raloxifene on markers of cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women, and to compare them with those induced by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Design.-Double-blind, randomized, parallel trial. Setting.-Eight sites in the United States. Participants.-390 healthy postmenopausal women recruited by advertisement. Intervention.-Participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 treatments: raloxifene, 60 mg/d; raloxifene, 120 mg/d; HRT (conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg/d, and medroxyprogesterone acetate, 2.5 mg/d); or placebo. Main Outcome Measures.-Change and percent change from baseline of lipid levels and coagulation parameters after 3 months and 6 months of treatment. Results.-At the last visit completed, compared with placebo, both dosages of raloxifene significantly lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 12% (P Ͻ .001), similar to the 14% reduction with HRT (P Ͻ .001). Both dosages of raloxifene significantly lowered lipoprotein(a) by 7% to 8% (P Ͻ .001), less than the 19% decrease with HRT (P Ͻ .001). Raloxifene increased high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol (HDL 2-C) by 15% to 17% (P Ͻ .05), less than the 33% increase with HRT (P Ͻ .001). Raloxifene did not significantly change high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, or plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1); whereas HRT increased HDL-C by 11% and triglycerides by 20%, and decreased PAI-1 by 29% (for all, P Ͻ .001). Raloxifene significantly lowered fibrinogen by 12% to 14% (P Ͻ .001), unlike HRT, which had no effect. Neither treatment changed fibrinopeptide A or prothrombin fragment 1 and 2. Conclusions.-Raloxifene favorably alters biochemical markers of cardiovascular risk by decreasing LDL-C, fibrinogen, and lipoprotein(a), and by increasing HDL 2-C without raising triglycerides. In contrast to HRT, raloxifene had no effect on HDL-C and PAI-1, and a lesser effect on HDL 2-C and lipoprotein(a). Further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether these favorable biochemical effects are associated with protection against cardiovascular disease.

No abstract

An increased diversity of therapeutic targets in the pharmaceutical industry in recent years has led to a greater diversity of toxicological effects. This, and the increased pace of drug discovery, leads to a need for new technologies for the rapid elucidation of toxicological mechanisms. As part of an evaluation of the utility of metabonomics in drug safety assessment, 1H NMR spectra were acquired on urine and liver tissue samples obtained from rats administered vehicle or a development compound (MrkA) previously shown to induce hepatotoxicity in several animal species. Multivariate statistical analysis of the urinary NMR data clearly discriminated drug-treated from control animals, due to a depletion in tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates, and the appearance of medium chain dicarboxylic acids. High-resolution magic angle spinning NMR data acquired on liver samples exhibited elevated triglyceride levels that were correlated with changes in the urinary NMR data. Urinary dicarboxylic aciduria is associated with defective metabolism of fatty acids; subsequent in vitro experiments confirmed that MrkA impairs fatty acid metabolism. The successful application of metabonomics to characterize an otherwise ill-defined mechanism of drug-induced toxicity supports the practicality of this approach for resolving toxicity issues for drugs in discovery and development.

Introduction Haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors have been treated with FVIIa‐containing bypassing agents for over 20 years. However, due to uncertainty regarding dose response and thrombotic risk, the use of a gradual, titrated, minimal dosing strategy remains prevalent, potentially hampering early haemostasis. Aim Evaluate the dose‐dependent efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of activated eptacog beta (rhFVIIa), a new recombinant inhibitor bypassing agent for the treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs). Methods A Phase 3, randomized, cross‐over study of initial dose regimens (IDRs) in 27 bleeding congenital haemophilia A or B subjects with inhibitors was conducted to evaluate on‐demand treatment of mild/moderate BEs. Intravenous 75 μg/kg or 225 μg/kg initial doses with 75 μg/kg subsequent doses by schedule were administered until clinical response. Results The primary endpoint was sustained clinical response within 12 hours, determined by a composite of objective and pain measures. In the 75 μg/kg IDR, 84.9% (95% CI; 74.0%, 95.7%) of mild/moderate BEs at 12 hours were successfully treated compared to 93.2% (95% CI; 88.1%, 98.3%) treated in the 225 μg/kg IDR. Efficacy between the IDRs was statistically different (P<.020) in mild/moderate bleeding episodes. Both IDRs were well tolerated with no detectable immunogenic or thrombotic responses to rhFVIIa or host cell proteins. Conclusion The dose‐dependent efficacy seen in this study supports individualizing the initial dose of eptacog beta to optimize clinical response. By reducing uncertainty, the PERSEPT 1 results should increase the adoption of early haemostasis as a treatment goal for clinicians who treat haemorrhage in the inhibitor population.

The 20 x 10(9) /L threshold for prophylactic platelet transfusion may be unnecessarily high. Few prospective studies, however, in which other trigger values were tested have been published. In this study all hospitalized, thrombocytopenic adult hematology-oncology patients in our institution were prospectively evaluated daily for hemorrhage and platelet transfusion during a one year period; no patients were excluded for bleeding or infectious problems. By design, during the initial six-months (baseline period), the prophylactic platelet transfusion trigger was 20 x 10(9) /L; for the second six-months (study period) this threshold was changed to 10 x 10(9) /L. Patients studied during the two periods did not differ significantly in age, gender, diagnosis, blood or marrow transplant status, and duration of neutropenia. Compliance with the thresholds was 95.6% (baseline period) and 93.5% (study period). For patients with platelet counts under 20 x 10(9) /L, the mean use of platelet transfusions per patient per day was significantly lower in the study period (4.47) than in the baseline period (6.48; p<0.001). Both mean prophylactic (1.54/patient-day) and therapeutic (2.93/patient-day) platelet transfusions were reduced in the study period compared with the baseline period (2.26 and 4.22/patient-day, respectively). Hemorrhage was slightly reduced in the study period compared with the baseline period: major hemorrhage, 15.2% vs. 18.4% (p=0.014); minor hemorrhage, 63.6% vs. 70.1% (p<0.001). Thus, hemorrhage was not increased with the lower trigger level. A 10 x 10(9) /L prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold value is safe and effective.