Background Multiple major health organisations recommend the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, initial reports of ECMO use in patients with COVID-19 described very high mortality and there have been no large, international cohort studies of ECMO for COVID-19 reported to date. Methods We used data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry to characterise the epidemiology, hospital course, and outcomes of patients aged 16 years or older with confirmed COVID-19 who had ECMO support initiated between Jan 16 and May 1, 2020, at 213 hospitals in 36 countries. The primary outcome was in-hospital death in a time-to-event analysis assessed at 90 days after ECMO initiation. We applied a multivariable Cox model to examine whether patient and hospital factors were associated with in-hospital mortality. Findings Data for 1035 patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO support were included in this study. Of these, 67 (6%) remained hospitalised, 311 (30%) were discharged home or to an acute rehabilitation centre, 101 (10%) were discharged to a long-term acute care centre or unspecified location, 176 (17%) were discharged to another hospital, and 380 (37%) died. The estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 37·4% (95% CI 34·4–40·4). Mortality was 39% (380 of 968) in patients with a final disposition of death or hospital discharge. The use of ECMO for circulatory support was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1·89, 95% CI 1·20–2·97). In the subset of patients with COVID-19 receiving respiratory (venovenous) ECMO and characterised as having acute respiratory distress syndrome, the estimated cumulative incidence of in-hospital mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO was 38·0% (95% CI 34·6–41·5). Interpretation In patients with COVID-19 who received ECMO, both estimated mortality 90 days after ECMO and mortality in those with a final disposition of death or discharge were less than 40%. These data from 213 hospitals worldwide provide a generalisable estimate of ECMO mortality in the setting of COVID-19. Funding None.

A retrospective review of 77 pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) patients who received recombinant antithrombin III (ATIII) for ATIII activity greater than 80% was conducted. Anticoagulation management was per institutional protocol. An ATIII activity greater than 80% was targeted. Diagnosis, reason for ECMO cannulation, blood product usage, heparin dosing, ATIII activity and doses, thrombotic and bleeding complications, hours on ECMO, and mortality were recorded. We calculated patient-level summary statistics and assessed differences between groups using χ tests (categorical variables) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests (continuous variables). Hierarchical generalized linear models were developed to model bleeding and thrombotic complications. The majority (n = 75) received venoarterial ECMO and had cardiac diagnoses (n = 62). Antithrombin III activity was below 80% for an average of 5.2 hours per patient. Antithrombin III activity less than 80% was not associated with thrombotic complications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-1.06, p = 0.86). Antithrombin III activity greater than 80% was not associated with bleeding complications (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.11, p = 0.44). Duration of ECMO was an independent predictor of thrombotic complications (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11, p = 0.02). There were no independent predictors of bleeding complications. Antithrombin III activity correlated with anti Xa activity (r = 0.367, p < 0.001) but not with other measures of anticoagulation or with heparin dose (r = 0.16, p = 0.165). ATIII activity was not associated with bleeding, thrombosis, or heparin dose. Antithrombin III activity was associated with anti Xa activity but not with traditional measures of anticoagulation. Antithrombin III replacement for an activity less than 80% did not increase bleeding.

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation is widely used and most frequently utilized in patients with acute lower airway disease. Factors such as severe defects in oxygenation and ventilation, disease progression, and patient tolerability decreased the likelihood of use. These findings may help direct further studies of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in children with acute respiratory failure.