Background Coronal malalignment occurs frequently in TKA and may affect implant durability and knee function. Designed to improve alignment accuracy and precision, the patient-specific positioning guide is predicated on restoration of the overall mechanical axis and is a multifaceted new tool in achieving traditional goals of TKA. Questions/purposes We compared the effectiveness of patient-specific positioning guides to manual instrumentation with intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial guides in restoring the mechanical axis of the extremity and achieving neutral coronal alignment of the femoral and tibial components. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 569 TKAs performed with patient-specific positioning guides and 155 with manual instrumentation by two surgeons using postoperative long-leg radiographs. For all patients, we assessed the zone in which the overall mechanical axis passed through the knee, and for one surgeon's cases (105 patient-specific positioning guide, 55 manual instrumentation), we also measured the hip-knee-ankle angle and the individual component angles with respect to their mechanical axes. Results The overall mechanical axis passed through the central third of the knee more often with patient-specific positioning guides (88%) than with manual instrumentation (78%). The overall mean hip-knee-ankle angle for patient-specific positioning guides (180.6°) was similar to manual instrumentation (181.1°), but there were fewer ± 3°hip-knee-ankle angle outliers with patient-specific positioning guides (9%) than with manual instrumentation (22%). The overall mean tibial (89.9°versus 90.4°) and femoral (90.7°versus 91.3°) component angles were closer to neutral with patient-specific positioning guides than with manual instrumentation, but the

Background Achieving balanced gaps is a key surgical goal in total knee arthroplasty, yet most methods rely on subjective surgeon feel and experience to assess and achieve knee balance intraoperatively. Our objective was to evaluate the ability to quantitatively plan and achieve a balanced knee throughout the range of motion using robotic-assisted instrumentation in a tibia-first, gap-balancing technique. Methods A robotic-assisted, gap-balancing technique was used in 121 consecutive knees. After resection of the proximal tibia, a computer-controlled tensioning device was inserted into the knee joint and the pre-femoral-resection knee gaps were acquired dynamically throughout flexion under controlled load. Predicted gap profiles were used to plan the femoral implant by adjusting the implant alignment and position within certain boundaries to achieve a balanced knee throughout the range of flexion. Femoral cuts were then made according to this plan using a miniature robotic-assisted cutting guide. The tensioning device used to measure the pre-femoral-resection gaps was then reinserted into the joint to quantify the final gap balance under known tension. The final gap profiles were then compared with the predictive gap plans. Results The overall root mean square error between the predicted and achieved gaps was 1.3 mm and 1.5 mm for the medial and lateral sides, respectively. Use of robotic assistance resulted in over 90% of knees having mediolateral balance within 2 mm across the flexion range. Gaps at 0° flexion were 2 mm smaller than the gaps at 90°. This difference decreased to less than 1 mm when comparing the tibiofemoral gaps at 10°, 45°, and 90°. Conclusions Imageless, robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately predicts postoperative gaps before femoral resections. This allows surgeons to virtually plan femoral implant alignment and optimize gap balance throughout the range of motion. The accurate prediction of gaps throughout the arc of motion combined with precise, robotically assisted femoral resection produces accurate postoperative ligament balance consistently.

Purpose Achieving a balanced knee is accepted as an important goal in total knee arthroplasty; however, the deinition of ideal balance remains controversial. This study therefore endeavoured to determine: (1) whether medio-lateral gap balance in extension, midlexion, and lexion are associated with improved outcome scores at one-year post-operatively and (2) whether these relationships can be used to identify windows of optimal gap balance throughout lexion. Methods 135 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, multi-surgeon, prospective investigation using a robot-assisted surgical platform and posterior cruciate ligament sacriicing gap balancing technique. Joint gaps were measured under a controlled tension of 70-90 N from 10°-90° lexion. Linear correlations between joint gaps and one-year KOOS outcomes were investigated. KOOS Pain and Activities of Daily Living sub-scores were used to deine clinically relevant joint gap target thresholds in extension, midlexion, and lexion. Gap thresholds were then combined to investigate the synergistic efects of satisfying multiple targets. Results Signiicant linear correlations were found throughout extension, midlexion, and lexion. Joint gap thresholds of an equally balanced or tighter medial compartment in extension, medial laxity ± 1 mm compared to the inal insert thickness in midlexion, and a medio-lateral imbalance of less than 1.5 mm in lexion generated subgroups that reported signiicantly improved KOOS pain scores at one year (median ∆ = 8.3, 5.6 and 2.8 points, respectively). Combining any two targets resulted in further improved outcomes, with the greatest improvement observed when all three targets were satisied (median ∆ = 11.2, p = 0.002). Conclusion Gap thresholds identiied in this study provide clinically relevant and achievable targets for optimising soft tissue balance in posterior cruciate ligament sacriicing gap balancing total knee arthroplasty. When all three balance windows were achieved, clinically meaningful pain improvement was observed. Level of Evidence Level II.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Soft tissue releases are often required to correct deformity and achieve balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, releasing soft tissues can be subjective, highly variable and is perceived as an ‘art’ in TKA. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of soft tissue release required to achieve a balanced knee in tibial-first gap- balancing versus conventional, measured resection TKA, and its effect on outcomes.Soft tissue releases were documented and reviewed in 1256 robotic-assisted gap- balancing and 85 robotic-assisted measured-resection TKAs. Knees were stratified by coronal deformity (varus: >2° varus; valgus: >2° valgus). Rates of releases were compared between the two groups and literature. A subset of these patients were also enrolled in a prospective study. KOOS outcomes were captured pre-operatively and at 6M post TKA.The frequency of soft tissue release was significantly lower in the robotic gap- balancing group, with 21% of knees requiring release versus 40% (p=0.001) in the robotic measured resection group and 67% (p<0.001) for conventional measured resection. Pre-operative KOOS scores were similar between groups, however 6M scores showed a significant improvement in QOL, Sports and Symptoms scores in knees not released.Robotic assisted TKA with predictive gap balancing was found to reduce the number of releases across all coronal angles compared to conventional instruments. Furthermore, performing a soft tissue release rather than bone resection to achieve balance, correlated with worse outcomes. Further research is required to understand when imbalance should be corrected with bone resection adjustment versus soft tissue release.

This study reports on the one-year clinical results and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) associated with a new ‘predictive balance’ tibia-cut first total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technique that uses a robotic ligament tensioner. PROMs are compared to registry data and historical results in the literature.Five hundred and thirty-three patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent robotic TKA (mean age: 67.7±8.4; females: 320; BMI: 31.2±4.9). Pre-op, three, six and 12-month WOMAC, UCLA activity scale, and HSS-Patient satisfaction assessments were completed by 533, 352, 314, and 256 patients, respectively, and compared to WOMAC registry data from the Shared Ortech Aggregated Repository (SOAR) and to historical satisfaction reports in the literature.Despite having equivalent baseline PROM scores, predictive balance patients had significantly higher WOMAC scores at all post-operative timepoints (p<0.001) and higher UCLA activity scale scores at 3M and 6M (p<0.013). Overall patient satisfaction in the predictive balance cohort was 91.2%, 92.4%, and 96.5% at 3M, 6M and 1YR, respectively. Average length of stay was 1.6 days (±0.8). Surgical complications in this cohort were typical of TKA.Limitations to this study include the lack of a closely matched control group. Nonetheless, first year results are promising with improved objective measures compared to large registry databases and recently reported patient satisfaction measures.