Summary Background Dental disease is commonly encountered in equine veterinary practice. Due to the horse's deep oral cavity, direct visual examination alone is not adequate for a complete oral evaluation. Typically, a long‐handled dental mirror is used as a visual aid. Oral endoscopy is another option to improve visual examination of the mouth. Although recent literature suggests endoscopy is superior to mirror examination, these modalities have not been compared in a blinded study. Objective The objective of the study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of identifying dental pathologies between oral mirror and rigid endoscopic examination, as well as evaluating the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of each modality. Study design Prospective randomised trial. Methods Twenty‐one horses underwent oral examination using a mirror and an endoscope with video recording of both techniques. An additional six horses received both premortem and post‐mortem examinations. Two blinded observers evaluated the video recordings and identified the presence of dental pathology to determine inter‐observer and intraobserver agreement. Live examinations were compared with the six post‐mortem examinations to determine sensitivity and specificity. Results Endoscopy sensitivity was far superior to mirror for all pathologies (83% vs. 39%), while specificity was high for both (71% vs. 87%, respectively) when compared to the gold‐standard post‐mortem examination. Inter‐observer agreement for the presence of pathology using endoscopy was substantial and higher than mirror examination. Intra‐observer agreement was moderate to substantial. Main limitations The study was limited by the small number of horses and post‐mortem examinations, although sample size was increased by assessing the pathology of each tooth. Conclusions Moderate to substantial agreement was found using both endoscopy and mirror examination. Sensitivity was improved with endoscopy. Oral endoscopy may be beneficial for use in monitoring dental disease over time, as many minor pathologies do not require immediate intervention. Endoscopic and mirror videos may also prove valuable in veterinary education.
The determination of a horse's age by its dentition is a technique that has been employed by horse owners and professionals since at least 600 BC. While aging teeth based on incisor wear patterns is common, wear patterns in the cheek teeth may also be useful. As horses continue to live longer, we routinely examine horses into their 20's and 30's, and it is becoming more common to observe aging changes in the cheek teeth. To our knowledge, this study is the first to use easily obtained clinical observation of the expiration of cheek teeth infundibula to age horses of advanced ages (16 to 35 years). The results of this study indicate that the attrition of infundibula is likely due to the combined effects of eruption time, length of the tooth or infundibulum, forces placed on the tooth or infundibulum, and the presence of enamel or cemental hypoplasia. With additional prospective studies, the use of cheek tooth infundibular expiration may become a useful tool to determine the age of horses in the field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.