The increasing clinical incidence and host risk of biomaterial-centered infections, as well as the reduced effectiveness of clinically relevant antibiotics to treat such infections, provide compelling reasons to develop new approaches for treating implanted biomaterials in a surgical context. We describe the direct local delivery of polyclonal human antibodies to abdominal surgical implant sites to reduce infection severity and mortality in a lethal murine model of surgical implant-centered peritoneal infection. Surgical implant-centered peritonitis was produced in 180 female CF-1 mice by the direct inoculation of surgical-grade polypropylene mesh disks placed in the peritoneal cavity with lethal doses of either methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mice randomly received a resorbable antibody delivery vehicle at the implant site: either a blank carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) aqueous gel or the same CMC gel containing 10 mg of pooled polyclonal human immunoglobulin G locally on the implant after infection, either alone or in combination with systemic doses of cefazolin or vancomycin antibiotics. Human antibodies were rapidly released (first-order kinetics) from the gel carrier to both peritoneal fluids and serum in both infection scenarios. Inocula required for lethal infection were substantially reduced by surgery and the presence of the implant versus a closed lethal peritonitis model. Survival to 10 days with two different gram-negative P. aeruginosa strains was significantly enhanced (p < 0.01) by the direct application of CMC gel containing antibodies alone to the surgical implant site. Human-equivalent doses of systemic vancomycin provided a significantly improved benefit (p < 0.01) against lethal, implant-centered, gram-positive MRSA infection. However, locally delivered polyclonal human antibodies in combination with a range of systemic vancomycin doses against MRSA failed to improve host survival. Successful antibody therapy against gram-negative, implant-centered infections complements the clinically routine use of systemic antibiotics, providing a mechanism of protection independent of antibiotic resistance.
Infectious peritonitis results from bacterial contamination of the abdominal cavity. Conventional antibiotic treatment is complicated both by the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and by increased patient populations intrinsically at risk for nosocomial infections. To complement antibiotic therapies, the efficacy of direct, locally applied pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) was assessed in a murine model (strains CF-1, CD-1, and CFW) of peritonitis caused by intraperitoneal inoculations of 106 or 107 CFU of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strains IFO-3455, M-2, and MSRI-7072). Various doses of IgG (0.005 to 10 mg/mouse) administered intraperitoneally simultaneously with local bacterial challenge significantly increased survival in a dose-dependent manner. Local intraperitoneal application of 10 mg of IgG increased animal survival independent of either the P. aeruginosa or the murine strains used. A local dose of 10 mg of IgG administered up to 6 h prophylactically or at the time of bacterial challenge resulted in 100% survival. Therapeutic 10-mg IgG treatment given up to 12 h postinfection also significantly increased survival. Human IgG administered to the mouse peritoneal cavity was rapidly detected systemically in serum. Additionally, administered IgG in peritoneal lavage fluid samples actively opsonized and decreased the bacterial burden via phagocytosis at 2 and 4 h post-bacterial challenge. Tissue microbial quantification studies showed that 1.0 mg of locally applied IgG significantly reduced the bacterial burden in the liver, peritoneal cavity, and blood and correlated with reduced levels of interleukin-6 in serum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.