Background
The burden of informal caregiving is significant and well-documented, yet the evidence is mixed as to whether being a caregiver presents an additional barrier to receiving recommended preventive care.
Objectives
To determine whether (1) caregivers compared to non-caregivers were less likely to receive preventive health services; and (2) higher intensity caregivers were less likely to receive preventive health services than lower intensity caregivers.
Research Design, Subjects, and Measures
Data were from a telephone survey of Latino and African American adults 50 years or older in South Los Angeles (n=702). Outcomes were flu vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, and colorectal cancer screening. Logistic regression models adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need factors according to the Andersen Model of Access to Health Care for Low-Income Populations.
Results
Caregiver type (e.g., adult child, non-related) was associated with varying odds of receiving a preventive service. Caregivers had lower odds than non-caregivers of receiving preventive services although odds of receiving a flu vaccination improved slightly for caregivers of persons with memory loss compared to other caregivers. More weekly caregiving hours was associated with higher odds of receiving flu vaccination (AOR 1.1, 95% CI=1.0, 1.1) or colorectal cancer screening (AOR 1.1, 95% CI=1.0, 1.1). Caregivers and non-caregivers age 65 and older or with chronic conditions were more likely to receive vaccinations.
Conclusions
Preventive service use was influenced by characteristics of the caregiving situation. An opportunity may exist to leverage care recipients’ ongoing contact with health care providers to increase caregivers’ own access to preventive services.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.