The case-fatality rate after subarachnoid hemorrhage has decreased during the last three decades. A plausible explanation for this decrease is the improved management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Background and Purpose-Outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is often graded as "poor," "fair," or "good."Such categories are usually based on physicians' assessments of physical abilities of patients rather than on how patients themselves perceive their physical, psychological, and social well-being. We assessed functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) in patients with SAH and their partners. Methods-In a consecutive series of 64 patients and 51 partners studied 4 months after the SAH, we assessed functional outcome by means of the Rankin Scale, and QoL by means of the SF-36, the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), and a visual analogue scale. Additionally, we asked two "simple questions" about dependency and recovery. All questionnaires were completed in an interview setting. The scores on the QoL instruments from patients and partners were stratified according to the Rankin grades of the patients and were compared with data from a Dutch reference population. Results-Only patients who had no symptoms at all (Rankin grade 0) had no reduction in QoL compared with the reference population; some of these patients even indicated an improvement in QoL from before the SAH according to the visual analogue scale. Patients who had symptoms but were independent (Rankin grades 1 to 3) and therefore usually designated as having "good outcome" often had reductions in QoL, on both the physical and psychosocial subscores of the SIP and SF-36. The QoL of partners was considerably reduced in several psychosocial domains. Conclusions-SAH

Functional outcome improves significantly between 4 months and 18 months post-SAH; studies on functional outcome after SAH can be compared only if outcome is assessed at the same time interval. The improved functional outcome seems to be accompanied by an improved QOL.

Background and Purpose-Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a major cause of death and disability in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We studied the prognostic value for DCI of 2 factors: the duration of unconsciousness after the hemorrhage and the presence of risk factors for atherosclerosis. Methods-In 125 consecutive patients admitted within 4 days after hemorrhage, we assessed the presence and duration of unconsciousness after the hemorrhage, the neurological condition on admission, the amount of subarachnoid blood, the size of the ventricles, and a history of smoking, hypertension, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The relationship between these variables and the development of DCI was analyzed by means of the Cox proportional hazards model. Results-The univariate hazard ratio (HR) for the development of DCI in patients who had lost consciousness for Ͼ1 hour was 6.0 (95% CI 3.0 to 12.0) compared with patients who had no loss or a Ͻ1-hour loss of consciousness. The presence of any risk factor for atherosclerosis yielded an HR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.6 to 3.5). The HR for unconsciousness remained essentially the same after adjustment for other risk factors for DCI. The HR for a poor World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score (grade IV or V) on admission was 2.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.5); that for a large amount of subarachnoid blood on CT was 3.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 7.3). Conclusions-The duration of unconsciousness after subarachnoid hemorrhage is a strong predictor for the occurrence of DCI. This observation may contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of DCI and increased attention for patients at risk. (Stroke. 1999;30:2268-2271.)

This pilot study shows that a clinical trial of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is feasible and probably safe. The effectiveness of ASA on functional outcome and delayed cerebral ischemia has to be studied in a larger trial.