Argatroban anticoagulation, compared with historical control subjects, improves clinical outcomes in patients who have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, without increasing bleeding risk.

While heparin has been used almost exclusively as a blood anticoagulant, important literature demonstrates that it also has broad anti-inflammatory activity. Herein, using low anti-coagulant 2-O,3-O-desulfated heparin (ODSH), we demonstrate that most of the anti-inflammatory pharmacology of heparin is unrelated to anticoagulant activity. ODSH has low affinity for anti-thrombin III, low anti-Xa, and anti-IIa anticoagulant activities and does not activate Hageman factor (factor XII). Unlike heparin, ODSH does not interact with heparin-platelet factor-4 antibodies present in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and even suppresses platelet activation in the presence of activating concentrations of heparin. Like heparin, ODSH inhibits complement activation, binding to the leukocyte adhesion molecule P-selectin, and the leukocyte cationic granular proteins azurocidin, human leukocyte elastase, and cathepsin G. In addition, ODSH and heparin disrupt Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18)-mediated leukocyte adhesion to the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and inhibit ligation of RAGE by its many proinflammatory ligands, including the advanced glycation end-product carboxymethyl lysine-bovine serum albumin, the nuclear protein high mobility group box protein-1 (HMGB-1), and S100 calgranulins. In mice, ODSH is more effective than heparin in reducing selectin-mediated lung metastasis from melanoma and inhibits RAGE-mediated airway inflammation from intratracheal HMGB-1. In humans, 50% inhibitory concentrations of ODSH for these anti-inflammatory activities can be achieved in the blood without anticoagulation. These results demonstrate that the anticoagulant activity of heparin is distinct from its anti-inflammatory actions and indicate that 2-O and 3-O sulfate groups can be removed to reduce anticoagulant activity of heparin without impairing its anti-inflammatory pharmacology.

Summary Oral warfarin is associated with extensive food and drug interactions, and there is a need to consider such interactions with the new oral anticoagulants (OACs) dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban. A literature survey was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and recent abstracts from thrombosis meetings to identify publications related to food, drug and dietary supplement interaction studies with dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Clinical experience regarding food interactions is currently limited. Regarding drug–drug interactions, dabigatran requires caution when used in combination with strong inhibitors or inducers of P‐glycoprotein, such as amiodarone or rifampicin. Rivaroxaban (and possibly apixaban) is contraindicated in combination with drugs that strongly inhibit both cytochrome P450 3A4 and P‐glycoprotein, such as azole antimycotics, and caution is required when used in combination with strong inhibitors of only one of these pathways. Important drug interactions of the new OACs that can lead to adverse clinical reactions may also occur with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and antiplatelet drugs, such as aspirin and clopidogrel. Over‐the‐counter (OTC) medications and food supplements (e.g. St. John’s Wort) may also interact with the new OACs. Given the common long‐term use of drugs for some chronic disorders, the frequent use of OTC medications and the need for multiple treatments in special populations, such as the elderly people, it is essential that the issue of drug interactions is properly evaluated. New OACs offer significant potential advantages to the field of venous thromboprophylaxis, but we should not fail to appreciate their lack of extensive clinical experience.

The characteristics of the currently available platelet function assays (platelet aggregation, serotonin release, and flow cytometry) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays that quantitate antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibody titers were studied using sera collected from clinically diagnosed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients, patients without heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, patients with platelet immune disorders other than heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and normal individuals. The platelet aggregation assay was less sensitive than the serotonin release assay, which was less sensitive than the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (p < 0.001). Yet heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was identified by platelet aggregation assay in cases where the serotonin release assay and/or the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were negative. Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis were more often positive than heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients without thrombosis (p < 0.05). Positive platelet aggregation assay and serotonin release assay results were generally associated with a higher antibody titer; however, a minimum critical titer could not be identified. Over a 30-day period the percentage of positive responses did not change significantly even though clinical symptoms corrected in most heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients. Multiple testing over several days enhanced the chance of detecting a positive, and combined results of the three assays further enhanced the positive response (p < 0.005). In patients without heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, false-positive results were obtained with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These data demonstrate that there is no direct correlation between the positive responses of these assays, that clinically positive patients can be missed by all assays, and the presence of antibody alone does not determine clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. With these limitations, the combination of aggregation, serotonin release, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay testing with multiple samples offers the best chance of identifying a positive heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patient. Caution is advised for all assays as none is optimal.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract