BACKGROUND: Recent clinical trial results have suggested that programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression measured by immunohistochemistry may predict response to anti–programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) therapy. Results on the association between PD-L1 expression and survival among patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy are inconsistent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated the relationship between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS) among 204 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, from 2007 to 2012. PD-L1 expression was measured using a prototype immunohistochemistry assay with the anti–PD-L1 22C3 antibody (Merck). PD-L1 strong positivity and weak positivity were defined to be traceable to the clinical trial version of the assay. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of patients had PD-L1 strong-positive tumors, and 50% had PD-L1 weak-positive tumors. No statistically significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and survival; adjusted hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.03; median OS, 9.0 months) for the PD-L1 strong-positive group and 1.07 (0.74-1.55; median OS, 9.8 months) for the PD-L1 weak-positive group compared with the PD-L1–negative group (median OS, 7.5 months). No association was seen between PD-L1 expression and OS when PD-L1 expression levels were stratified by median or tertiles. CONCLUSIONS: In concordance with previous studies, we found PD-L1 measured by immunohistochemistry to be frequently expressed in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, PD-L1 expression is not a strong prognostic marker in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy.
AimsHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is considered a causative agent for the development of a broad range of human carcinomas. The role of HPV in the development of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinoma (cSCC) remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the HPV prevalence in a nationwide cohort and to describe clinical and histopathological features in relation to HPV status.MethodsAll cases of CIN and cSCC in Denmark from 1980 to 2016 were included. We combined p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), RNA in situ hybridisation (RNA ISH) and HPV DNA PCR to detect HPV. The results were correlated to clinical and histopathological parameters.ResultsOne hundred twelve primary tumours and 33 recurrent tumours were included for HPV analysis. Twenty-four (21%) of the primary tumours were HPV positive by PCR. Eighteen of out 19 HPV-positive tumours were positive by RNA ISH. HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype (n=18, 75%). The patients with HPV-positive tumours were significantly younger (mean difference 11.5 years, 95% CI 5.2 to 17.9, p=0.0005) and had a higher recurrence compared with patients with HPV-negative tumours (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.02 to 5.21, p=0.046). The HPV-positive tumours were associated with a positive p16 IHC and a non-keratinising morphology.ConclusionWe describe distinct clinical and histopathological features associated with HPV status in cSCC. The finding of transcriptionally active HPV in this material lends support to a causal role of HPV in a subset of cSCC.
Aim: Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) may predict response to checkpoint inhibitors, but their prevalence and prognostic value are unknown in many cancers. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) and MSI-H and their association with clinical outcomes among patients with ten advanced uncommon cancers. Results: 398 of 426 patients (93%) had a valid PD-L1 result; most (242; 61%) had CPS ≥1. Prevalence of MSI-H tumors was 8/360. Median overall survival was shorter among patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 tumors after first-line treatment (23.0 vs 39.7 months, p = 0.014). Conclusion: PD-L1 was commonly expressed in solid tumors, and CPS ≥1 was associated with shorter overall survival. Prevalence of MSI-H was low.
Little is known about the infiltrative pattern of innate immune cells in primary melanoma compared with their paired metastases and in BRAFV600E-mutated tumors. Therefore, our aim was to characterize the inflammatory microenvironment in primary ulcerated and nonulcerated melanomas and paired metastases, to investigate the relation between inflammation and BRAFV600E mutation in primary melanoma and paired metastases, and to evaluate the effect of the analyzed biomarkers on melanoma-specific survival. A total of 385 primary tumors and 96 paired metastases were stained with immunohistochemistry for BRAFV600E, CD163+ macrophages, CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells, CD66b+ neutrophils, and E-cadherin and estimated using objective computer-assisted image analysis. BRAFV600E was semiquantitatively scored as either present or absent. In metastases of nonulcerated melanomas, we observed higher neutrophil (P=0.02) and macrophage (P=0.01) numbers. In the metastases of ulcerated melanomas, we found a higher number of macrophages (P<0.0001). Increase in the neutrophil numbers in the metastases was associated with poor patient survival after first relapse (hazard ratio=1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.38, P=0.02). BRAFV600E-positive primary tumors (P=0.02) and metastases (P=0.01) exhibited increased plasmacytoid dendritic cell numbers compared with BRAFV600E-negative tumors. Lastly, primary melanomas in men had higher neutrophil numbers than women (P≤0.0001), and men had worse melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio=1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–2.21, P=0.03). Our data show that melanoma metastases are densely infiltrated with neutrophils, which affects survival. Our results also highlight the importance of recognizing the presence of inflammatory cells in the metastases as a prognostic marker, and that they may potentially be used to improve the precision of immunotherapy and BRAFV600E targeted therapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.