Background Evidence suggests a role for excessive inflammation in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an oral anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis, and coronary disease. We aimed to investigate the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19-related death or hospital admission.Methods The present study is a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The study was done in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the USA, and was led by the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by PCR testing or clinical criteria who were not being treated in hospital were eligible if they were at least 40 years old and had at least one high-risk characteristic. The randomisation list was computer-generated by an unmasked biostatistician, and masked randomisation was centralised and done electronically through an automated interactive web-response system. The allocation sequence was unstratified and used a 1:1 ratio with a blocking schema and block sizes of six. Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally administered colchicine (0•5 mg twice per day for 3 days and then once per day for 27 days thereafter) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospital admission for COVID-19. Vital status at the end of the study was available for 97•9% of patients. The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The COLCORONA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04322682) and is now closed to new participants. FindingsTrial enrolment began in March 23, 2020, and was completed in Dec 22, 2020. A total of 4488 patients (53•9% women; median age 54•0 years, IQR 47•0-61•0) were enrolled and 2235 patients were randomly assigned to colchicine and 2253 to placebo. The primary endpoint occurred in 104 (4•7%) of 2235 patients in the colchicine group and 131 (5•8%) of 2253 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 0•79, 95•1% CI 0•61-1•03; p=0•081). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 96 (4•6%) of 2075 patients in the colchicine group and 126 (6•0%) of 2084 patients in the placebo group (OR 0•75, 0•57-0•99; p=0•042). Serious adverse events were reported in 108 (4•9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 139 (6•3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0•051); pneumonia occurred in 63 (2•9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 92 (4•1%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0•021). Diarrhoea was reported in 300 (13•7%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 161 (7•3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p<0•0001).Interpretation In community-treated patients including those without a mandatory diagnostic test, the effect of colchicine on COVID-19-related clinical events was not statistically significant. Among patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, colchicine led to a lower rate of the composite of death or hospital admission than placebo. Given the absence of orally administered therapies to pr...

BackgroundEvidence suggests the role of an inflammatory storm in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis and coronary disease.MethodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind trial involving non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing or clinical criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to receive colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for 3 days and once daily thereafter) or placebo for 30 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospitalization for COVID-19.ResultsA total of 4488 patients were enrolled. The primary endpoint occurred in 4.7% of the patients in the colchicine group and 5.8% of those in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.79; 95.1% confidence interval (CI), 0.61 to 1.03; P=0.08). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 4.6% and 6.0% of patients in the colchicine and placebo groups, respectively (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P=0.04). In these patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the odds ratios were 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99) for hospitalization due to COVID-19, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.23 to 1.07) for mechanical ventilation, and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.66) for death. Serious adverse events were reported in 4.9% and 6.3% in the colchicine and placebo groups (P=0.05); pneumonia occurred in 2.9% and 4.1% of patients (P=0.02). Diarrhea was reported in 13.7% and 7.3% in the colchicine and placebo groups (P<0.0001).ConclusionAmong non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19, colchicine reduces the composite rate of death or hospitalization. (COLCORONA ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04322682)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating neurological disease in which autoreactive T lymphocytes sensitized to myelin components of the central nervous system are postulated to contribute to pathogenesis. The possible relevance of molecular mimicry between a human coronavirus and the myelin basic protein component of myelin in the generation of this autoimmune reaction was evaluated. Myelin basic protein- and virus-reactive T-cell lines were established from 16 MS patients and 14 healthy donors and shown to be mostly CD4+. In contrast to healthy donors, several T-cell lines isolated from MS patients showed cross-reactivity between myelin and coronavirus antigens. Overall, 29% of T-cell lines from MS patients (10 donors) but only 1.3% of T-cell lines from normal control subjects (2 donors) showed an HLA-DR-restricted cross-reactive pattern of antigen activation after in vitro selection with either myelin basic protein or human coronavirus strain 229E antigens. Moreover, reciprocal reactivities were only observed in MS patients (4 donors). This establishes molecular mimicry between a common viral pathogen, such as this human coronavirus, and myelin as a possible immunopathological mechanism in MS and is consistent with the possible involvement of more than one infectious pathogen as an environmental trigger of disease.

The immunosuppressive macrolide rapamycin is used in humans to prevent graft rejection. This drug acts by selectively repressing the translation of proteins that are encoded by an mRNA bearing a 5-polypyrimidine tract (e.g., ribosomal proteins, elongation factors). The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) carries a polypyrimidine motif that is located within the tat exon 2. Treatment of human T lymphoid cells with rapamycin resulted in a marked diminution of HIV-1 transcription when infection was performed with luciferase reporter T-tropic and macrophage-tropic viruses. Replication of fully infectious HIV-1 particles was abolished by rapamycin treatment. The rapamycin-mediated inhibitory effect on HIV-1 production was reversed by FK506. The anti-HIV-1 effect of rapamycin was also seen in primary human cells (i.e., peripheral blood lymphocytes) from different healthy donors. Rapamycin was shown to diminish basal HIV-1 long terminal repeat gene expression, and the observed effect of rapamycin on HIV-1 replication seems to be independent of the virusspecific transactivating Tat Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has a complex life cycle that begins when the virus binds to a host cell, enters the cell, and, using the host cell's machinery, creates numerous copies of itself within the host cell (28). In an attempt to combat this retroviral infection, several drugs and strategies targeting specific steps of the virus replicative cycle were developed. For instance, anti-CD4 antibodies in association with anti-gp120 antibodies were shown to block HIV-1 infection in human T cells (11), whereas a potent suppression of HIV-1 replication in humans was observed with T-20, a peptide inhibitor of gp41-mediated virus entry (38). In addition, various chemokines (e.g., RANTES, MIP-1␣, MIP-1␤, and SDF-1) were shown to block the interaction between the gp120/CD4 complex and either the CCR5 or CXCR4 coreceptor on the cell surface, inhibiting the process of viral entry (5,7,17,21,24,45,50,54).Other strategies targeting Tat and the viral integrase were also developed in an attempt to fight HIV-1 (40, 51). Interestingly, specific inhibitors of transcriptional factors (NF-B, NF-AT, and Sp1) were also proposed as effective ways to control HIV-1 replication (4, 23, 32, 66). The current therapy against this retroviral infection, better known as highly active antiretroviral therapy, consists usually in the association of two reverse transcriptase inhibitors (e.g., zidovudine and lamivudine) and a protease inhibitor that blocks the maturation process (43,55,73,74). These potent drugs, however, show strong adverse effects, and their long-term efficiency is severely hampered by the emergence of resistant viruses. Although major advances occurred in the last decade in the management of HIV-1 infection, both less toxic and more effective anti-HIV-1 therapeutics are still needed.Rapamycin (Rapamune, Sirolimus) is a macrolide exhibiting potent antitumor and immunosuppressive activities (1, 46). This agent has been shown to inhibit...